Transparent Collaborative Sharing: Adopting Open-Source Methodology for Improving Business Processes and Public Trust
References
- Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. DOI: 10.1177/146879410100100307
- Bianco, V., Chinosi, M., Lavazza, L., Morasca, S., & Taibi, D. (2011). A survey on open-source software trustworthiness. IEEE Software, 28(5), 67–75. DOI: 10.1109/MS.2011.93
- Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113. DOI: 10.1177/1468794106058877
- Bureau of Economic Analysis. (2023). Gross domestic product (third estimate), corporate profits, and GDP by industry, fourth quarter and year 2022. United States Department of Commerce.
https://www.bea.gov - Burgess, M. (2004). Principles of network and system administration. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. DOI: 10.1002/047086107X
- Creswell, J., & Creswell, J. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed-methods research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
- Daffara, C. (2012).
Open-source software adoption best practices: Myths, realities, processes and economic growth . In S. K. Sowe, G. Parayil, & A. Sunami (Eds.), Free and Open-Source Software and Technology for Sustainable Development (pp. 141–163). United Nations University Press. DOI: 10.18356/50ccb38a-en - Dahl, D., Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2015). Why and when consumers prefer products of user-driven firms: A social identification account. Management Science, 61(8), 1978–1988. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1999
- De Fine Licht, J. (2014). Policy area as a potential moderator of transparency effects: An experiment. Public Administration Review, 74, 361–371. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12194
- De Laat, P. (2004). Evolution of open-source networks in industry. The Information Society, 20(4), 291–299. DOI: 10.1080/01972240490481027
- Edelman. (2017). 2017 Edelman trust barometer. Edelman Holdings, Inc.
https://www.edelman.com - Edelman. (2020). 2020 Edelman trust barometer. Edelman Holdings, Inc.
https://www.edelman.com - Finel, B., & Lord, K. (1999). The surprising logic of transparency. International Studies Quarterly, 43(2), 315–339. DOI: 10.1111/0020-8833.00122
- Florini, A. (1998). The end of secrecy. Foreign Policy, 111, 50–63. DOI: 10.2307/1149378
- Flyverbom, M., Leonardi, P., Stohl, C., & Stohl, M. (2016). The management of visibilities in the digital age. International Journal of Communication 10, 98–109.
- Foresi, J. (2020). Managed services and as-a-service market insights. ISG Index, 4th Qtr,
2019 . - Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4/5), 663–671. DOI: 10.1080/09614520701469955
- Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., & Schreier, M. (2010). The psychological effects of empowerment strategies on consumers’ product demand. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 65–79. DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.74.1.65
- Gorard, S. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
- Greene, J., Caracelli, V., & Graham, W. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. DOI: 10.3102/01623737011003255
- Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. DOI: 10.1111/puar.12047
- Gruenewald, C. (2012, June 20). Selective openness, fairness, and the motivation to contribute to open innovation communities. P. Maskell (Chair), DRUID Academy Conference 2012 on Innovation and Competitiveness [Paper presentation], Copenhagen, Denmark:
Dynamics of Organizations, Industries, Systems, and Regions . - Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1–7. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.1
- Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2014) Transparency in global environmental governance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262027410.001.0001
- Hertel, G. (2002).
Management of virtual teams based on social psychology models . In E.H. Witte (Ed.), Sozialpsychologie wirtschaftlicher Prozesse (pp 172–202). Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Publishers. - Hertel, G., Niedner, S., & Herrmann, S. (2003). Motivation of software developers in open-source projects: An internet-based survey of contributors to the linux kernel. Research Policy, 32(7), 1159–1177. DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00047-7
- Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
- MacDermott, S. (2015). Diplomacy: An open-source alternative. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 39(1), 99–104.
- Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods, and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16, 193–205.
- Mason, M. (2008). Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 8–13. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.8
- Open Source. (2019). About. OpenSource.com.
https://www.opensource.com - Open Source Initiative. (2019). About. OpenSource.org.
https://www.opensource.org - Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511807763
- Panko, R. (2019). Small business outsourcing statistics in 2019. Clutch Report.
https://clutch.co/bpo/virtual-assistants/resources/small-business-outsourcing-statistics - Pavlou, P. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. DOI: 10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
- Payne, C. (2002). On the security of open-source software. Information Systems Journal, 12(1), 61–78. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00118.x
- Raymond, E. (2001). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musing on linux and open-source by an accidental revolutionary. Cambridge: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
- Reynolds, P. (2019). 2019 ISG momentum market trends & insights geography report. ISG Research.
https://research.isg-one.com/reportaction/2019-Momentum-Geography-Report/Marketing - Roberts, J. (2009). No one is perfect: The limits of transparency and an ethic for ‘intelligent’ accountability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 957–970. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.005
- Roumani, Y., Nwankpa, J., & Roumani, Y. (2017). Adopters’ trust in enterprise open-source vendors: An empirical examination. Journal of Systems and Software, 125, 256–270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.12.006
- Senia, M., Horton, J., & Whitehead, R. (2010). Collaborative competition: The open-source solution. Competition Forum, 8(1), 52–57.
- United States Economic Census. (2022). Manufacturing in America: 2022. United States Census Bureau.
https://www.census.gov - Whitehurst, J. (2015). The open organization: Igniting passion and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jts.418 | Journal eISSN: 1541-9258
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 20
Submitted on: Feb 26, 2024
Accepted on: Jun 4, 2024
Published on: Jun 21, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2024 Lawrence Bosek, John Pickard, Szufang Chuang, David Batts, Jon Musgrave, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.