Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Do Alternatively and Traditionally Certified Beginning Workforce Development Teachers Feel About Their Preparedness? Cover

How Do Alternatively and Traditionally Certified Beginning Workforce Development Teachers Feel About Their Preparedness?

Open Access
|Aug 2024

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Workforce development area codes and descriptors.

WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT AREANTPS CODEDESCRIPTION
Agricultural Education241Agriculture and natural resources
Business & Information242Business management
Technology Education243Business support
Marketing Education244Marketing and distribution
Health Science Education245Healthcare occupations
Technology & Engineering
Education
246Construction trades, engineering, or science technologies (including CADD and drafting)
250Communications and related technologies (including design, graphics, or printing; not including computer science)
255Industrial arts or technology education
Trade & Industrial
Education
247Mechanics and repair
249Manufacturing or precision production (electronics, metalwork, textiles, etc.)
Family & Consumer
Sciences Education
253Personal and public services
(including culinary arts, cosmetology, child care, social work, protective services,
custodial services, and interior design)
254Family and consumer sciences education
Other Career or Technical Education256
Table 2

Workforce Development teaching assignment NTPS demographics.

CERTIFICATION ROUTE
TRADITIONAL ROUTEALTERNATIVE ROUTE
Weighted sample size20,33014,750
Mean age (years)34.2039.70
Mean teaching experience (years)2.712.29
Male45.1%45.5%
Female54.9%54.5%

[i] SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), ‘Public School Teacher Data File,’ 2015–16.

Table 3

Perceived preparedness composite variable and individual item descriptive statistics.

CERTIFICATION ROUTEVARIABLEMEANSESDMINMAX
AlternativePerceived Preparedness24.9480.5046.3161140
Behavior Management2.4450.0640.80214
Instructional Methods2.5130.0710.86314
Subject Matter3.2320.0670.79214
Computers3.0100.0700.87514
Assessment2.6080.0650.79014
Differentiate Instruction2.3470.0710.88414
Student Assessment for Instruction2.2940.0660.82214
Content Standards2.5360.0710.91214
LEP/ELL1.8730.0690.84714
Special Education2.0900.0640.85414
TraditionalPerceived Preparedness26.9650.5055.8281440
Behavior Management2.6480.0680.78414
Instructional Methods2.8110.0760.83914
Subject Matter3.2730.0600.76614
Computers3.1430.0780.85414
Assessment2.8110.0660.78314
Differentiate Instruction2.7220.0790.84814
Student Assessment for Instruction2.4480.0770.86114
Content Standards2.7770.0810.87214
LEP/ELL2.0150.0690.80414
Special Education2.3170.0630.72414

[i] Note: SE is standard error. SD is standard deviation. Min is minimum score. Max is maximum score. LEP/ELL is limited English proficiency and English language learner.

SOURCE: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), ‘Public School Teacher Data File,’ 2015–16.

Table 4

Results from t-tests for perceived preparedness composite variable and individual items for alternative and traditional programs.

VARIABLEALTERNATIVE PROGRAM MEAN SCORETRADITIONAL PROGRAM MEAN SCOREDIFFdftpCOHEN’S d
Perceived preparedness24.94826.965–2.017200–2.9070.0040.332
Behavior Management2.4452.648–0.203200–2.1210.0350.262
Instructional Methods2.5132.811–0.298200–2.9360.0040.350
Subject Matter3.2323.273–0.041200–0.4870.627na
Computers3.0103.143–0.133200–1.3490.179na
Assessment2.6082.811–0.203200–2.1830.030.258
Differentiate Instruction2.3472.722–0.375200–3.575<0.0010.433
Student Assessment for Instruction2.2942.448–0.154200–1.5500.123na
Content Standards2.5362.777–0.241200–2.2570.0250.270
LEP/ELL1.8732.015–0.142200–1.4860.139na
Special Education2.0902.317–0.227200–2.5920.010.287

[i] Note: Diff is mean score difference, df is degrees of freedom. t is t-test value. p is probability level, na is not applicable.

SOURCE: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS), “Public School Teacher Data File,” 2015–16.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jts.417 | Journal eISSN: 1541-9258
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 31
Submitted on: Feb 22, 2024
Accepted on: Jul 16, 2024
Published on: Aug 14, 2024
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Bradley Bowen, Thomas Williams, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.