Shaping STEM Literacy Through Discourse: The Role of Engineering and Technology in a New Zealand Classroom
By: Mathew Thomas
References
- Adams, J. D., Gupta, P., & Cotumaccio, A. (2012). Long-term participation in an informal STEM learning experience: The impact of environmental science-focused backyard programs. International Journal of Science Education, 34(4), 515–537.
- Barnett, M. (2005). Engaging students in scientific inquiry: Investigating physical and chemical changes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 327–345.
- Beane, J. A. (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 616–622.
- Berland, L. K., & Busch, K. C. (2012). Negotiating STEM epistemic commitments in engineering design projects. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–39.
- BERA (British Educational Research Association). (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research (4th ed.). BERA.
- Capobianco, B. M., DeLisi, J., & Radloff, J. (2013). Characterizing elementary teachers’ enactment of engineering design-based science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(2), 217–243. 10.1007/s10972-012-9292-0
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
- Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. 10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
- Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
- Cunningham, C. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2017). Epistemic practices of engineering for education. Science Education, 101(3), 486–505. 10.1002/sce.21271
- English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8. 10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
- Flick, U. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection. Sage.
- Hand, B., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J. P., & Prain, V. (2003). Message from the “Island Group”: What is literacy in science literacy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 607–615. 10.1002/tea.10132
- Hmelo, C. E., Holton, D. L., & Kolodner, J. L. (2000). Designing to learn about complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(3), 247–298.
- Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
- Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1998).
Data management and analysis methods . In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 179–210). Sage. - Jonassen, D. H. (2014). Engineers as problem solvers. Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, 103–118.
- Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. 10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
- Kelly, G. J. (2011).
Discourse in science classrooms . In S. Wortham, D. Kim, & S. May (Eds.), Discourse and education (pp. 66–77). Springer. - Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36(4), 515–526. 10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.007
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
- Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. 10.1002/tea.1015
- Leung, J. C. (2020). STEM literacy in an interdisciplinary curriculum: A case study of a secondary school’s STEM education program. International Journal of Science Education, 42(3), 340–362. 10.1080/09500693.2019.1701462
- Lin, K. Y., Cheng, Y. Y., & Chang, Y. S. (2021). Making interdisciplinary connections through STEM inquiry: A longitudinal case study of secondary students’ development of STEM literacy. Research in Science Education, 51(5), 1455–1481. 10.1007/s11165-019-09906-1
- Malone Back, S., Greenhalgh-Spencer, H., & Frias, K. (2016).
The application of transdisciplinary theory and practice to STEM education . In C. R., Handbook of Research on Technology Tools for Real-World Skill Development (pp. 42–67). IGI Global. 10.4018/978-1-4666-9441-5.ch003 - Mansilla, V. B., & Duraisingh, E. D. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215–237. 10.1353/jhe.2007.0005
- Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Australian Council of Learned Academies.
- Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1),
2 . - Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analyzing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137–168. 10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
- Mercer, N., & Howe, C. (2012). Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1(1), 12–21. 10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.03.001
- Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Moje, E. B. (2007). Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1–44. 10.3102/0091732X07300046
- National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.
- Nicolescu, B. (2002). Manifesto of transdisciplinarity. SUNY Press.
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. 10.1177/1609406917733847
- Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466. 10.1126/science.1183944
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
- Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other. Science, 328(5977), 459–463. 10.1126/science.1182595
- Post, G., Keestra, M., & Rutting, L. (2016). An introduction to interdisciplinary research: Theory and practice. Amsterdam University Press. 10.1515/9789048531615
- Reiser, B. J., & Tabak, I. (2014).
Scaffolding . In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 44–62). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139519526.006 - Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526. 10.1002/sce.21006
- Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75. 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
- Takeuchi, M. A., Sengupta, P., Shanahan, M-C., Adams, J. D., & Hachem, M. (2020). Transdisciplinarity in STEM education: A critical review. Studies in Science Education, 56(2), 213–259. 10.1080/03057267.2019.1649820
- Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Teachers’ views of integrated STEM education and its implementation in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 1–20.
- Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. 10.1177/1077800410383121
- Van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
- Williams, P. J. (2017). STEM education: What does mathematics have to offer? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(2), 211–223. 10.1007/s13394-017-0192-1
- Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design-based science, science content performance, and science attitudes in elementary school. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 513–540. 10.1002/jee.20027
- Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H. L. (2004). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(4), 563–589. 10.1007/s10763-004-3229-z
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v37i1.a.2 | Journal eISSN: 1045-1064
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 31
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2025
Accepted on: Oct 14, 2025
Published on: Nov 7, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2025 Mathew Thomas, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.