How does Emotion and Matter Matter in Engineering Education?
References
- Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotions. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3): 801–831.
- Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.
- Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, space time enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268. DOI: 10.3366/E1754850010000813.
- Bellinger, D.B., DeCaro, M.S., & Ralston, P. A. S. (2015). Mindfulness, anxiety, and high-stakes mathematics performance in the laboratory and classroom. Consciousness and Cognition, 37, 123–132. 10.1016/j.concog.2015.09.001.
- Bernhard, J. (2015).
Engineering education research as engineering research . In S.H. Christensen, C. Didier, A. Jamison, M. Meganck, C. Mitcham, & B. Newberry (Eds.) International Perspectives on Engineering Education. Engineering education and practice in context. Volume 1. (pp. 393–414). Cham: Springer International Publishing. - Bybee, R. (2000).
Teaching science as inquiry . In J. Minstrel & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science. (pp. 20–46). Washington, DC: American association for the advancement of science (AAAS). - Danielak, B.A., Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2014). Marginalized Identities of Sense-Makers: Reframing Engineering Student Retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 8–44. 10.1002/jee.20035.
- Danielsson, A. T. (2009). Doing physics—doing gender: An exploration of physics students’ identity constitution in the context of laboratory work. Empirical Dissertation. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Physics, Department of Physics and Materials Science.
- Davis, J.P. & Bellocchi, A. (2020). Intensity of Emotional Energy in Situated Cultural Practices of Science Education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(2), 359–388. 10.1007/s11422-019-09931-0.
- Feisel, L.D., Rosa, A.J. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 121–130. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00833.x.
- Gonsalves, A. (2014). “Physics and the girly-girl—there’s a contradiction in there somewhere”: Doctoral students’ positionings around gender and competence in physics. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 9, 503–521. 10.1007/s1142 2-012-9447-6.
- Gonsalves (2020). Constructing inside-ness to physics: how matter comes to matter in physics identity work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15, 911–921. 10.1007/s11422-020-09999-z.
- Hansson, S. O. (2007). What is technological science? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 38(3), 523–527. 10.1016/j.shpsa.2007.06.003.
- Hansson, S. O. (2013).
What is Technological Knowledge? In: Skogh, I.-B., de Vries, M. J. (eds) Technology Teachers as Researchers (pp. 17–31). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. - Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds) (2014). STEM integration is K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. DOI: 10.17226/18612
- International Technology Education Association (ITEA)/International Technology and Engineering Education (ITEEA), (2007).
Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology (3rd ed.) . Reston, VA: Author - Kalthoff, B., Theyssen, H. & Schreiber, N. (2018). Explicit promotion of experimental skills. And what about the content-related skills? International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1305–1326. 10.1080/09500693.2018.1477262.
- Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511815355.
- Litzinger, T.A., Lattuca, L.R., Hadgraft, R.G., & Newstetter, W.C. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123–150. 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00006.x.
- Lombardi, S. A., Hicks, R. E., Thompson, K. V. & Marbach-Ad, G. (2014). Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions. Advanced Physiological Education 38, 80–86. 10.1152/advan.00154.2012.
- Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2014). Reassembling gender: On the immanent politics of gendering apparatuses of bodily production in science. Women: A cultural review 25(1), 78–98. 10.1080/09574042.2014.901109.
- Lönngren, J., Bellocchi, A., Berge, M., Bøgelund, P., Direito, I, Huff, J.L., Mohd-Yusof, K., Murzi, H., Rahman, N. F. A., & Tormey, R. (2024). Emotions in engineering education: A configurative meta-synthesis systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 1287–1326. 10.1002/jee.20600.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18290
- Norström, P. (2015). Technological Experiments in Technology Education. In the proceedings of the Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT) conference: Plurality and Complementary Approaches in Design and Technology Education (pp. 322–327). Marseille, France.
- Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge Types in Technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1), 65–72. 10.1023/A:1008865104461.
- Vincenti, W. G. (1990). What Engineers Know and How They Know It. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
- Wajcman, J. (1995).
Feminist theories of technology . In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 189–204). New York: Sage Publications. 10.4135/97814 12990 12. - Wells, J. G. (2010).
Research on teaching and learning in science education: Potentials in technology education . In P. A. Reed & J. E. LaPorte (Eds.), Research in Technology Education (pp. 192–217). 59th Yearbook of the Council on Technology Teacher Education. Reston, VA: Council on Technology Teacher Education.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v36i2.a.2 | Journal eISSN: 1045-1064
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 24
Submitted on: Mar 4, 2024
Accepted on: Feb 4, 2025
Published on: May 16, 2025
Published by: Virginia Tech
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2025 Annica Gullberg, Kristina Andersson, Jenny Ivarsson, Henni Söderberg, published by Virginia Tech
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.