Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Interviewing Peer Leaders: Inter-Reliability of a Growth-Oriented Selection Rubric Cover

Interviewing Peer Leaders: Inter-Reliability of a Growth-Oriented Selection Rubric

Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Ansley, S., Miller, J. S., Rager, J., Brode, C., & Chaplin, C. (2025). Dignity by design. In J. Tippets & E. Kirby (Eds.), ASCEND to higher retention rates: A collection of best practices and practical strategies from higher education experts for increasing student retention, completion, and student success (Vol. 3). Tippets & Kirby Consulting.
  2. Ashenafi, M. M. (2017). Peer-assessment in higher education: Twenty-first century practices, challenges, and the way forward. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 226251. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711
  3. Berg, S. A., & Stoner, J. C. (2016). Selecting resident assistants: The relationship between candidate assessment and job performance. The Journal of College and University Student Housing, 42, 2636.
  4. Bowman, N. A., Preschel, S., & Martinez, D. (2023). Does Supplemental Instruction improve grades and retention? A propensity score analysis approach. Journal of Experimental Education, 91(2), 205229. 10.1080/00220973.2021.1891010
  5. Breslin, J. D., Kope, M. H., O’Hatnick, J. L., & Sharpe, A. G. (2018). Students as colleagues: A paradigm for understanding student leaders in academic support. The Learning Assistance Review, 23(2).
  6. Carr, A. C. (2018). Supplemental Instruction Interview Rubric (SIIR). [Unpublished work].
  7. Chan, Z., & Ho, S. (2019). Good and bad practices in rubrics: The perspectives of students and educators. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(4), 533545. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1522528
  8. Cheung-Blunden, V., & Khan, S. R. (2018). A modified peer rating system to recognise rating skill as a learning outcome. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(1), 5867. 10.1080/02602938.2017.1280721
  9. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 3746. 10.1177/001316446002000104
  10. Cohen, J. (1968). Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), 213220. 10.1037/h0026256
  11. Colvin, J. W. & Ashman, M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 121134. 10.1080/13611261003678879
  12. Culpepper, D., White-Lewis, D., O’Meara, K., Templeton, L., & Anderson, J. (2023). Do rubrics live up to their promise? Examining how rubrics mitigate bias in faculty hiring. The Journal of Higher Education, 94(7), 823850. 10.1080/00221546.2023.2168411
  13. Cuseo, J. (2010a). Peer leadership: Definition, description, and classification. E-Source for College Transitions, 7(5), 35. https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/national_resource_center/publications/search/details.php?id=1545
  14. Cuseo, J. (2010b). Peer leadership: Situation-specific support roles. E-Source for College Transitions, 7(6), 45. https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/national_resource_center/publications/search/details.php?id=1541
  15. Cuseo, J. (2010c). Peer power: Empirical evidence for the positive impact of peer interaction, support, and leadership. E-Source for College Transitions, 7(4), 46. https://sc.edu/about/offices_and_divisions/national_resource_center/publications/search/details.php?id=1552
  16. Ender, S. C., & Kay, K. (2001). Peer leadership programs: A rationale and review of the literature. In S. L. Hamid (Ed.), Peer leadership: A primer on program essentials (Monograph Series No. 32, pp. 111). The National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  17. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287322. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1170785?seq=1
  18. Gannouni, K., & Ramboarison-Lalao, L. (2018). Leadership and students’ academic success: Mediating effects of self-efficacy and self-determination. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(1), 6679, 10.1080/13603124.2015.1123300
  19. Ganser, S. R., & Kennedy, T. L. (2012). Where it all began: Peer education and leadership in student services. New Directions for Higher Education, 157, 1729. 10.1002/he.20003
  20. Gladding, S. (2012). Transactional analysis, reality therapy, Adlerian, and person-centered groups. In S. Gladding (Ed.), Groups: A counseling specialty (6th ed., pp. 321351). Pearson.
  21. Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (4th ed.). Advanced Analytics.
  22. Hamid, S. L., & VanHook, J. (2001). First-year seminar peer leaders, programs, and profiles. In S. L. Hamid (Ed.), Peer leadership: A primer on program essentials (Monograph No. 32, pp. 3752). University of South Carolina, The National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  23. Harper, S. R. (2010). An anti-deficit achievement framework for research on students of color in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 6374. 10.1002/ir.362
  24. Harper, S. R. (2012). Black male student success in higher education: A report from the National Black Male College Achievement Study. Center for the Study of Race and Equity in Education, University of Pennsylvania. https://rossierapps.usc.edu/facultydirectory/publications/231/Harper%20(2012)%20Black%20Male%20Success.pdf
  25. Hicks, D. (2021). Dignity: Its essential role in resolving conflict. Yale University Press. 10.12987/9780300263503
  26. Hunter, M. S., & Heath, M. M. (2001). The building blocks of the peer leader programs: Recruitment, selection, and training. In S. L. Hamid (Ed.), Peer leadership: A primer on program essentials (Monograph No. 32, pp. 3752). The National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition.
  27. Irwin, L. N., Miller, J. S., Morgan, K., & Linley, J. (2023). A critical ecological exploration of peer socialization agents’ sense of belonging. Journal of College Student Development, 64(5), 509523. 10.1353/csd.2023.a911787
  28. Janson, H., & Olsson, U. (2001). A measure of agreement for interval or nominal multivariate observations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 277289. 10.1177/00131640121971239
  29. Janson, H., & Olsson, U. (2004). A measure of agreement for interval or nominal multivariate observations by different sets of judges. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 6270. 10.1177/0013164403260195
  30. Jarratt, L., Martin-Stanley, C. R. II, Linley, J. L., Mollet, A. L., Anderson, D. L., & Mohebali, M. (2024). Underlife: Peer socialization agents’ resistance to higher education diversity narratives. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 17(3), 430442. 10.1037/dhe0000431
  31. Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 130144. 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002
  32. Keller, P., & Porter, H. D. (2020). A terminological study of peer education in higher education [White paper]. College Reading and Learning Association. https://cdn.ymaws.com/crla.net/resource/resmgr/white_papers/crla_2020_whitepaper_peer_ed.pdf
  33. Keup, J., & Skipper, T. (2010, March 21–24). Findings from the 2009 National Survey of Peer Leaders. [Conference session]. American College Personnel Association Annual Convention, Boston, MA, United States.
  34. Klein, D. (2018). Implementing a general framework for assessing interrater agreement in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 18(4), 871901. 10.1177/1536867X1801800408
  35. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159174. 10.2307/2529310
  36. Leyzberg, D., Lumbroso, J., & Moretti, C. (2017). Nailing the TA interview: Using a rubric to hire teaching assistants. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 128133. 10.1145/3059009.3059057
  37. Linley, J. L. (2015). We are (not) all bulldogs: Minoritized peer socialization agents’ critical sensemaking about collegiate contexts [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. MSU Libraries Digital Repository. https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/3464
  38. Linley, J. L. (2017). We are (not) all bulldogs: Minoritized peer socialization agents’ meaning-making about collegiate contexts. Journal of College Student Development, 58(5), 643656. 10.1353/csd.2017.0051
  39. Linley, J. L. (2018). Racism here, racism there, racism everywhere: The racial realities of minoritized peer socialization agents at a historically white institution. Journal of College Student Development, 59(1), 2136. 10.1353/csd.2018.0002
  40. McDaniel, A. (2008). Recruiting and training Supplemental Instruction Leaders. In M.E. Stone & G. Jacobs (Eds.), Supplemental Instruction: Improving First-Year Student Success in High-Risk Courses (pp. 3956). University of South Carolina.
  41. Moore, C., & Teather, S. (2013). Engaging students in peer review: Feedback as learning. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2), 196211.
  42. Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To Rubric or Not to Rubric? The Effects of Self-Assessment on Self-Regulation, Performance and Self-Efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 133148. 10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872
  43. Perez, D., Ashlee, K., Do, V., Karikari, S., & Sim, C. (2017). Re-conceptualizing student success in higher education: Reflections from graduate student affairs educators using anti-deficit achievement framework. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 28(3), 528.
  44. Popham, W. J. (1997). What’s wrong – and what’s right – with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55(2), 7275. https://skidmore.edu/assessment/handbook/Popham_1997_Whats-Wrong_and-Whats-Right_With-Rubrics.pdf
  45. Rager, J. P., & Leslie, D. (2023). Adapted Supplemental Instruction Interview Rubric (SIIR). [Unpublished work].
  46. Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435448. 10.1080/02602930902862859
  47. Reyes, H. L., & Duran, A. (2021). Higher education scholars challenging deficit thinking: Ananalysis of research informed by community cultural wealth. Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Affairs, 6(1), 720.
  48. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
  49. Sambamurthy, N., & Cox, M. F. (2016, June), Developing a Behavior-Based Rubric for Assessing Professional Skills During Hiring. [Paper presentation]. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, United States. 10.18260/p.27288
  50. Shook, J., & Keup, J. (2012). The benefits of peer leader programs: An overview from the literature. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(157), 516. 10.1002/he.20002
  51. Skalicky, J., Speed, H., van der Meer, J., & Young, D. G. (2024). An international snapshot of peer leadership in higher education. Journal of Leadership Education, 24(1), 84101. 10.1108/JOLE-02-2024-0031
  52. Taylor, B., Kisby, F., & Reedy, A. (2024). Rubrics in higher education: An exploration of undergraduate students’ understanding and perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(6), 799809. 10.1080/02602938.2023.2299330
  53. The International Center for Supplemental Instruction. (2019). SI Supervisor manual.
  54. The International Center for Supplemental Instruction. (2022). What is Supplemental Instruction? https://info.umkc.edu/si/
  55. van der Meer, J., Skalicky, J., Speed, H., & Young, D. G. (2022). Focusing on the development of the whole student: An international comparative study of the perceived benefits of peer leadership in higher education. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 1435. 10.4236/jss.2022.103002
  56. Witty, M. C., & Adomaitis, R. (2014). Carl Rogers and client-centered counseling. In R. D. Parsons & N. Zhang (Eds.), Counseling theory: Guiding reflective practice (pp. 171199). Sage. 10.4135/9781483399621.n7
  57. Zhang, B., Johnston, L., & Kilic, G. B. (2008). Assessing the reliability of self- and peer rating in student group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 329340. 10.1080/02602930701293181
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21061/jopl.151 | Journal eISSN: 2200-2359
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Submitted on: Jul 31, 2025
Accepted on: Jan 5, 2026
Published on: Aug 11, 2026
Published by: Virginia Tech Publishing
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Jillian P. Rager, Jaime S. Miller, Joseph M. Kush, Deidre Leslie, Ashley C. Carr, published by Virginia Tech Publishing
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.