Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Horizontal integration of multiple institutions: solutions for Yarshagumba related conflict in the Himalayan region of Nepal? Cover

Horizontal integration of multiple institutions: solutions for Yarshagumba related conflict in the Himalayan region of Nepal?

Open Access
|Mar 2017

Figures & Tables

figures/ijc2017-2017010_fig_001.jpg
Figure 1

Map of Yarsagumba collection sites in the border area of Uttarakhand State of India and far western Nepal.

figures/ijc2017-2017010_fig_002.jpg
Figure 2

Sketch-map of Byas VDC, with grazing areas and Yarsagumba collection sites.

figures/ijc2017-2017010_fig_003.jpg
Figure 3

Stakeholders and their issues in the conflict (own source).

Table 1

Relevant policies and regulations related to Yarsagumba management in Darchula District.

Policies and regulationsMajor focusLine agencies under Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation
Herbs and Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFP) Development Policy 2004 (HNCC 2004)
  • Calls for private sector participation in NTFPs development

  • Emphasizes local processing

  • Stresses conservation and preservation of high value herbs and NTFPs and as well as regulations on the amount to be harvested each season

Department of Plant Resources
Government of Nepal Gazette 2016 (GON 2016)
  • Allows users to collect Yarsagumba by paying NRP 25,000/kg

Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation
Conservation Area Management Rules 1996 (GON 1996)
  • Calls for the management of conservation areas through a community-based approach

  • Provides communities the right to manage the area through the development of village management plans

Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation
Community Forestry Directive 1995 and Community Forestry Development Programme Guidelines 2008 (DOF 1995; DOF 2008)
  • Government retains ownership of forest

  • CFUG holds the right to use and make management decisions

  • CFUG develops 5-year operational plan and annual plan, which need approval of government authority

  • Government approves any sale outside the group, CFUG members are allowed to harvest, process, and sell timber and NTFPs

Department of Forests
Forest Act 1993, Forest Regulations 1995, Forest Sector Policy 2000 (GON 1993; GON 1995; GON 2000)
  • Provides legal document about property rights and user rights

  • Regulates extraction and usage of forest products

Department of Forests
figures/ijc2017-2017010_fig_004.jpg
Figure 4

Sketch-map of Api Nampa Conservation Area with the migratory route of the Shauka (own source).

Table 2

Average number of Yarsagumba specimens collected per family and income from Yarsagumba in Budi and Api-Kuntison over the last 5 years (standard deviation in parentheses).

20102011201220132014
Budi (open to outsiders)Collection (average number)475 (404)297 (217)230 (169)198(174)186 (126)
Average income (NPR)36,000 (26,643)36,600 (32,272)40,500 (39,700)51,700 (51,841)58,500 (51,841)
Duration of stay50 (11)52 (12)51(13)51 (14)53 (19)
Daily income (NPR)72270979810141105
Price/ piece76123176261315
Api-Kuntison (closed to outsiders)Collection (average number)249 (157)231 (132)223 (152)281 (155)283 (177)
Average income (NPR)41,500 (61,867)32,500 (22,802)42,100 (36,051)62,800 (39,252)94,000 (72,692)
Duration of stay49 (18)50 (18)51 (19)51 (18)55(31)
Daily income (NPR)84365582012281721
Price/piece166141189223332
Table 3

Underlying causes for conflicts within ANCA.

Directly related to Yarsagumba collectionIndirectly related to Yarsagumba collection
SocioeconomicHigh return of investment on YarsagumbaHigh poverty rate in the district forces the communities to look for alternative income sources
PoliciesLack of specific policy concerning Yarsagumba in Nepal (it is regulated under the Non Timber Forest Products policy of 2004, which lists Yarsagumba as an open access natural resource)Participation of distant users and nomads in community forest management
The amount to be paid to the government authority for trade changed from NPR 10,000/kg in 2007 GoN Gazette 2007) to NPR 25,000/kg in 2016
Government authoritiesLimited presence of government authorities in collection sites during the collection period to ensure property rights are obeyedVarious overlapping legal institutions in ANCA without coordination stimulate mistrust between communities and government authorities
Institution – Community Forest
  • Community forest regulations enable the Shauka community to make decisions on access to collection sites

  • Social ties of Nepali Shauka are closer to Indian Shauka than to non-Shauka communities of Nepal

  • The Shauka established Yarsagumba management committees for open sites such as the Budi gazing area

  • Community forest regulations and formation changed access for Shauka communities to forest areas during transhumance movements

  • Customary rights were not considered while creating the community forests and within the 5 year operational plans

Institution – ANCAVDC-level ANCA Conservation Committees are not yet established or functionalANCA structures are not yet fully established, functional, or accepted by the local communities
Environment
  • Collection period lasts only for 2 months per year

  • Decreasing availability of Yarsagumba due to apparent overharvesting

Productivity of agricultural land is decreasing which reduces household income and forces population to look for alternative income sources
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.717 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Mar 14, 2017
Published by: Uopen Journals
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2017 Basant Pant, Rajesh Kumar Rai, Corinna Wallrapp, Rucha Ghate, Uttam Babu Shrestha, Ashok Ram, published by Uopen Journals
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.