Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia Cover

Can rewards for environmental services benefit the poor? Lessons from Asia

Open Access
|Apr 2009

References

  1. Adhikari B Lovett J. C Transaction costs and community-based natural resource management in Nepal Journal of Environmental Management 2006 78 1 5 15
  2. Angelsen A Wunder S Exploring the forest-poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications CIFOR Occasional Paper, (40) 2003 http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-40.pdf
  3. Ashley C Hussein K Developing methodologies for livelihood impact assessment: experience of the African Wildlife Foundation in East Africa. Working Paper (129) 2000 London, UK Overseas Development Institute http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/odi-publications/working-papers/129-livelihood-impact-assessment-wildlife-foundation-east-africa.pdf
  4. Asquith N. M Vargas M. T Wunder S Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia Ecological Economics 2008 65 4 675 684
  5. Cacho O. J Marshall G. R Milne M Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink projects in developing countries Environment and Development Economics 2005 10 5 1 18
  6. Chambers R Conway G. R Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century IDS Discussion Paper (296) 1992
  7. EcoSecurities and United Nations Development Programme Transaction costs, efficiency and supportive governance The Clean Development Mechanisms: A User's Guide 2003 New York United Nations Development Programme In
  8. Ferraro P. J Global habitat protection: limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments Conservation Biology 2001 15 990 1000
  9. Ferraro P. J 2007 Regional Review of Payments for Watershed Services: Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM CRSP) Office of International Research, Education, and Development (OIRED), Virginia Tech
  10. Ferraro P. J Kiss A Direct payments to conserve biodiversity Science 2002 298 1718 1719
  11. Gouyon A Rewarding the upland poor for environmental services: a review of initiatives from developed countries RUPES Working Papers 2003 http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sea/networks/rupes/download/paper/AGouyon_RUPES.pdf
  12. Grieg-Gran M Porras I Wunder S How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America World Development 2005 33 9 1511 1527
  13. Hadi D. P van Noordwijk M Agro-ecosystems, their population densities and land cover in Indonesia in the context of upland-lowland relationships RUPES Working Paper 2005 http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sea/Publications/searchpub.asp?publishid=1365
  14. Hope R. A Porras I. T Miranda M Agarwal C Amezaga J. M Are the upland poor benefiting from environmental service reward schemes? ETFRN News 2005 http://www.research4development.info/PDF/Outputs/Forestry/R8174AretheUplandPoor.pdf
  15. Huang M Upadhyaya S. K Watershed-based payment for environmental services in Asia Working Paper No. 06-07 2007 http://www.oired.vt.edu/sanremcrsp/documents/PES.Sourcebook.Oct.2007/Sept.2007.PESAsia.pdf
  16. IFAD Assessment of rural poverty – Asia and the Pacific 2002 Rome, Italy International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
  17. Kerr J Watershed development, environmental services, and poverty alleviation in India World Development 2002 30 8 1387 1400
  18. Kuperan K Abdullah N. M. R Pomeroy R. S Genio E. L Salamanca A. M Measuring transaction costs of fisheries co-management Coastal Management 2008 36 3 225 240
  19. Landell-Mills N Porras I. T Silver bullet or fools' gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impact on the poor 2002 London, United Kingdom International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED)
  20. Leimona B Jack B. K Pasha R Suyanto 2007 Field experiment of direct incentive scheme for reducing soil erosion. Paper read at the 28th Biannual Workshop of Environment and Economy Program of Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), held from 13–16 November 2007 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  21. Mburu J Birner R Zeller M Relative importance and determinants of landowners‘ transaction costs in collaborative wildlife management in Kenya: an empirical analysis Ecological Economics 2003 45 1 59 73
  22. MEA The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series 2005 Washington DC
  23. Mukherjee N Hardjono J Carriere E People, poverty and livelihoods: links for sustainable poverty reduction in Indonesia 2002 Jakarta, Indonesia World Bank
  24. Munawir Vermeulen S Fair deals for watershed services in Indonesia Natural Resource (9) 2007 http://www.iied.org/pubs/pdfs/13539IIED.pdf
  25. Pagiola S Arcenas A Platais G Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America World Development 2005 33 2 237 253
  26. Perrot-Maître D Davis P 2001 Case studies of markets and innovative financial mechanisms for water services from forests. Forest Trends (http://www.forest-trends.org)
  27. Robertson N Wunder S Fresh Tracks in the Forest Assessing Incipient Payments for Environmental Services Initiatives in Bolivia 2005 Bogor, Indonesia CIFOR
  28. Scherr S. J Bennet M. T Loughney M. Canby K 2006 Payments in China: lessons learned from international experience. Forest Trends (http://www.forest-trends.org)
  29. Smith M de Groot D Perrot-Maître D Bergkamp G Pay – Establishing payments for watershed services 2006 Gland, Switzerland IUCN
  30. Tomich T. P Thomas D. E van Noordwijk M Environmental services and land use change in Southeast Asia: from recognition to regulation or reward? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2004 104 1 229 244
  31. Van Noordwijk M Leimona B Emerton L Tomich T. P Velarde S. J Kallesoe M Sekher M Swallow B Criteria and indicators for environmental service compensation and reward mechanisms: realistic, voluntary, conditional and pro-poor 2007 Nairobi, Kenya World Agroforestry Centre
  32. Wunder S Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts CIFOR Occasional Paper (42) 2005 http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-42.pdf
  33. Wunder S The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation Conservation Biology 2007 21 1 48 58
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.121 | Journal eISSN: 1875-0281
Language: English
Published on: Apr 3, 2009
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2009 Beria Leimona, Laxman Joshi, Meine van Noordwijk, published by Igitur, Utrecht Publishing & Archiving Services for IASC
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.