Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Empirical Analysis of the Commercial Viability of Greenhouse Vegetable Farming in Ghana Cover

An Empirical Analysis of the Commercial Viability of Greenhouse Vegetable Farming in Ghana

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

Key financial model assumptions

No.AssumptionValue/Basis
1Analysis period5 repayment years + 12-month moratorium (Year 0)
2CropsTomatoes, sweet pepper, cucumber
3Annual price escalation10% (aligned with inflation and USD/GH¢ depreciation)
4Production capacity20 domes × 120 m2 effective area
5Capacity utilisationYear 0: 40%; Year 1: 80%; Years 2–5: 100%
6YieldsTomatoes & sweet pepper: 15 kg/m2; Cucumber: 150 fruits/m2
7Cropping cycles/yearTomatoes & cucumber: 2 cycles; Sweet pepper: 1 cycle
8Inflation rate on costs12.1% per annum
9Discount rate25% (prevailing average lending rate, commercial banks, Ghana, August 2025)
10Loan interest rate25% per annum
11Service charge0.5% of loan amount
12Moratorium12 months, principal and interest; interest capitalised
13Repayment period5 years after moratorium, reducing balance, monthly
14Equity/debt mixBlended (debt + equity)
15Tax holiday5 years (agricultural ventures, Ghana Revenue Authority)
16USD exchange rateGH¢11/USD (rate at time of data collection)

[i] Source: field data (2026) and commercial bank lending terms, Ghana.

Table 2.

Capital and set-up cost summary

ItemCost (GH¢)
Capital expenditure (CAPEX)
20 greenhouse domes (USD 10,000/dome × GH¢11)2,200,000
Pack house and accessories220,000
Mini-car (internal transport)165,000
Pick-up vehicle (distribution and procurement)480,000
Total CAPEX3,065,000
Set-up/development costs
Site engineering (land, borehole, access road, engineer)149,650
Training and operational equipment20,072
Working capital747,639
Total set-up costs917,361
Total project cost3,982,361

[i] Source: field data, 2026.

Table 3.

Revenue and key production parameters by period

IndicatorYear 0 (moratorium)Year 1Year 2Year 3Year 4Year 5
Total revenue (GH¢)1,244,1602,737,1523,763,5844,139,9424,553,9375,009,330
Capacity utilisation40%80%100%100%100%100%
Total output (units)74,880149,760187,200187,200187,200187,200
Tomato price (GH¢/kg)38.0041.8045.9850.5855.6461.20
Sweet pepper (GH¢/kg)50.0055.0060.5066.5573.2180.53
Cucumber (GH¢/fruit)9.009.9010.8911.9813.1814.49

[i] Source: field data, 2026.

Table 4.

Break-even analysis by crop

CropBEP (units)Avg. selling price (GH¢)BEP (revenue, GH¢)
Tomatoes4,24349207,354
Sweet peppers2,12264136,417
Cucumbers21,21712245,550
Total27,582–589,321

[i] Source: field data, 2026.

Table 5.

Sensitivity analysis – effect of price and cost shocks on NPV and IRR

ScenarioNPV (GH¢)IRR (%)Viability
Baseline (no change)838,54833%Viable
Price −10%−549,62320%Not viable
Price −20%−1,937,7943%Not viable
Cost +10%139,64426%Viable
Cost +20%−559,26020%Not viable
Price −10% + Cost +10%−1,239,36712%Not viable
Price −20% + Cost +20%−3,298,963n.a.*Not viable

* IRR not meaningfully interpretable when deeply negative NPV renders no positive discount rate capable of equating inflows to outflows.

Source: authors' calculations from field data, 2026.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2026.3.00015r1 | Journal eISSN: 1899-5772 | Journal ISSN: 1899-5241
Language: English
Page range: 257 - 269
Accepted on: May 6, 2026
Published on: Sep 30, 2026
Published by: Poznań University of Life Science
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 John-Mark Akandekumtiim, Alexander Ekow Asmah, Michael Oppong, published by Poznań University of Life Science
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.