Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Remote Sensing-Based Assessment of Hayfield Productivity and Forage Quality in Mongolia’s Steppe Ecosystems Cover

Remote Sensing-Based Assessment of Hayfield Productivity and Forage Quality in Mongolia’s Steppe Ecosystems

Open Access
|Jun 2026

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of research Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 2.

Research study area of Bornuur sub-province, Tuv province Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 3.

Field work points location Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 4.

Land surface factors map of Bornuur sub-province. a – elevation, b – slope, c – aspect Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 5.

Vegetation indices map of Bornuur sub-province. a – EVI, b – NDWI, c – NDVI, d – SAVI Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 6.

Correlation matrix of variables *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Values without asterisks are not statistically significant Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 7.

Linear regression plots of forage yield versus vegetation indices (NDVI, EVI, SAVI, NDWI) Source: own elaboration.

Fig. 8.

Linear regression analysis: Yield and land surface factors Source: own elaboration.

Descriptive statistical results of vegetation indices

IndicesMeanStdVarMedianSkewnessKurtosisQ25Q75
NDVI0.7020380.0832450.0069300.723672–0.0713652.0454540.6424600.756097
NDWI–0.5386840.0269570.000727–0.5490651.0815113.079622–0.554977–0.531618
SAVI0.9407310.1209260.0146230.986801–1.5291004.2644920.9296601.006785
EVI0.5055700.0888880.0079010.491353–0.6985894.1824470.4601480.579817

Variable importance estimates from multivariate analysis

VariableEstimateStd. errorp-value95% CI
NDVI18.8276.6590.022*(3.470, 34.184)
EVI7.8558.2270.368(–11.115, 26.826)
NDWI7.79716.3490.646(–29.905, 45.499)
Slope–0.2890.2420.266(–0.846, 0.268)

SHAP variable importance

VariableMean (SHAP)Direction
NDVI1.567Positive
EVI0.698Positive
Slope0.680Negative
NDWI0.210Positive
Elevation0.186Positive
Total. protein0.173Positive

Summary of hayfield yield and forage quality (Bornuur)

VariableMinMaxMean (approx.)
Area (ha)10.36 000
Yield (g/m2)54.1132.993
Moisture (%)4.927.695.9
Dry matter (%)92.3195.0894.1
Crude protein (%)9.1216.5611.9
Fibre (%)22.836.9630.1
Digestibility (%)55.6668.5961.7
Energy (MJ)8.029.878.8

Descriptive statistical results of Land surface factors

Land surface factorMeanStdVarMedianSkewnessKurtosisQ25Q75
Elevation1 114.784.17 060.91133.0–0.63.31 050.81 159.5
Aspect166.6118.614 076.4160.20.11.858.3250.1
Slope7.12.45.56.9–0.22.95.78.7

Model comparison results

ModelRMSEMAER2
FULL0.8530.6530.879
LASSO0.8890.6770.869
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2026.2.00013r1 | Journal eISSN: 1899-5772 | Journal ISSN: 1899-5241
Language: English
Page range: 195 - 204
Accepted on: May 27, 2026
Published on: Jun 30, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Buyanbaatar Avirmed, Erdenetuya Boldbaatar, Dambadarjaa Naranbat, Sainbayar Surenkhuu, Ariunsuren Purevee, Oyuntuya Sharavjamts, published by The University of Life Sciences in Poznań
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.