Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Development and clinical feasibility testing of the Pain Treatment Planning Questionnaire Cover

Development and clinical feasibility testing of the Pain Treatment Planning Questionnaire

The Journal of Haemophilia Practice
Volume 7 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)
By: Susan M Tupper,  JoAnn Nilson,  Jennifer King,  Pamela Downe,  Nancy Hodgson,  Tara Schlosser and  Kelsey Brose  
Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Elander J, Robinson G, Mitchell K, Morris J. An assessment of the relative influence of pain coping, negative thoughts about pain, and pain acceptance on health-related quality of life among people with haemophilia. Pain 2009; 145: 169–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.06.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Van Galen KPM, Sanders YB, Vojinovic U, et al. Joint bleeds in von Willebrand disease patients have significant impact on quality of life and joint integrity: a cross-sectional study. Haemophilia 2015; 21: e185–e192. doi: 10.1111/hae.12670.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Forsyth AL, Witkop M, Lambing A, et al. Associations of quality of life, pain, and self-reported arthritis with age, employment, bleed rate, and utilization of haemophilia treatment center and health care provider services: results in adults with haemophilia in the HERO study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2015; 9: 1549–60. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S87659.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Witkop M, Lambing A, Divine G, et al. A national study of pain in the bleeding disorders community: a description of haemophilia pain. Haemophilia 2012; 18: e115–e119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02709.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Holstein K, Klamroth R, Richards M, et al. Pain management in patients with haemophilia: a European survey. Haemophilia 2012; 18: 743–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2012.02808.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Riley RR, Witkop M, Hellman E, Akins S. Assessment and management of pain in haemophilia patients. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 839–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02567.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Humphries TJ, Kessler CM. The challenge of pain evaluation in haemophilia: can pain evaluation and quantification be improved by using pain instruments from other clinical situations? Haemophilia 2013; 19: 181–7. doi: 10.1111/hae.12023.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Young G, Tachdjian R, Baumann K, Panopoulos G. Comprehensive management of chronic pain in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2014; 20: e113–e120. doi: 10.1111/hae.12349.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Witkop M, Lambing A, Kachalsky E, et al. Assessment of acute and persistent pain management in patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2011; 17 (4): 612–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02479.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. de Moerloose P, Fischer K, Lambert T, et al. Recommendations for assessment, monitoring, and follow-up of patients with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2012; 18 (3): 319–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02671.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Williams AC, Craig KD. Updating the definition of pain. Pain 2016; 157 (1): 2420–23. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000613.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Fillingim RB, Loesser JD, Barion R, Edwards RR. Assessment of chronic pain: domains, methods, and mechanisms. J Pain 2016; 17 (9 Suppl): T10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.010.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Turk DC, Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, Patel KV. Assessment of psychosocial and functional impact of chronic pain. J Pain 2016; 17 (9 Suppl): T21–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2016.02.006.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Auerswald G, Dolan G, Duffy A, et al. Pain and pain management in haemophilia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2016; 27 (8): 845–54. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000571.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Lambing A, Witkop M, Humphries TJ. Complementary and alternative therapy (CAM) in haemophilia pain management: a review of published literature. J Haem Pract 2019; 6 (1): 7–18. doi: 10.17225/jhp00122.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Street RL. How clinician-patient communication contributes to health improvement: modeling pathways from talk to outcome. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92: 286–91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD. A conceptual framework for patient-provider communication: a tool in the PRO research tool box. Qual Life Res 2009; 18 (1): 109–14. doi: 10.1007/s11136-008-9417-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Dorflinger L, Kerns RD, Auerbach SM. Providers’ roles in enhancing patients’ adherence to pain self-management. Transl Behav Med 2013; 3 (1): 39–46. doi: 10.1007/s13142-012-0158-z.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Zanetti CA, Taylor N. Value in co-creation in healthcare through positive deviance. Healthc (Amst) 2016; 4: 277–81. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.06.003.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Ruben MA, Meterko M, Bokhour BG. Do patient perceptions of provider communication relate to experiences of physical pain? Patient Educ Couns 2018; 101 (2): 209–13. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Heckman BW, Mathew AR, Carpenter MJ. Treatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to health. Curr Opin Psychol 2015; 1 (5): 31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Valderas JM, Ferrer M, Mendivil J, et al; Scientific Committee on “Patient-Reported Outcomes” of the IRYSS Network. Development of EMPRO: a tool for the standardized assessment of patient-reported outcome measures. Value Health 2008; 11 (4): 700–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00309.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Izumi S, Vandermause R, Benavides-Vaello S. Adapting cognitive interviewing for nursing research. Res Nurs Health 2013; 36 (6): 623–33. doi: 10.1002/nur.21567.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Knafl K, Deatrick J, Gallo A, et al. The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 2007; 30 (2): 224–34. doi: 10.1002/nur.20195.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Drennan J. Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42 (1): 57–63.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Smith BH, Penny KI, Purves AM, et al. The Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire: validation and reliability in postal research. Pain 1997; 71: 141–7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ, Dworkin SF. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992; 50: 133–49.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011; 63 (Suppl 11): S240–52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Salaffi FF, Stancati AF, Grassi W. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Clin Rheumatol 2006;25: 619–31. doi: 10.1007/s10067-005-0140-y.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Witkop M, Neff A, Buckner TW, et al. Self-reported prevalence, description and management of pain in adults with haemophilia: methods, demographics and results from the Pain, Functional Impairment, and Quality of life (P-FiQ) study. Haemophilia 2017; 23: 556–65. doi: 10.1111/hae.13214.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Wallny T, Hess L, Seuser A, et al. Pain status of patients with severe haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2001; 7 (5): 453–58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.2001.00540.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Häuser W, Schmutzer G, Hilbert A, Brähler E, Henningsen P. Prevalence of chronic disabling noncancer pain and associated demographic and medical variables: a cross-sectional survey in the general German population. Clin J Pain 2015;31: 886–92. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000173.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Burton CD, Entwistle VA, Elliott AM, et al. The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions. BMJ Open 2017; 7(4): e015689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015689.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Assessment and Management of Pain. Clinical Best Practice Guidelines. Third edition. ON: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; 2013. Available from https://rnao.ca/sites/rnao-ca/files/AssessAndManagementOfPain2014.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of Chronic Pain: A National Clinical Guideline. SIGN 136. Revised edition, August 2019. Available from: https://www.sign.ac.uk/sign-136-management-of-chronic-pain (accessed 11 March 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Hooten M, Thorson D, Bianco J, et al; Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement. Pain: Assessment, Non-Opioid Treatment Approaches and Opioid Management. Updated August 2017. Available from: http://www.icsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Pain.pdf (accessed 11 March 2020).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Brod M, Tesler LE, Christensen TL. Qualitative research and content validity: developing best practices based on science and experience. Qual Life Res 2009; 18(9): 1263–78. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975; 1(3): 227–99.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Cleeland CS. Pain assessment in cancer. In: Osoba D, ed. Effect of Cancer on Quality of Life. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Inc.; 1991: 293–305.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Edwards N. Barker PM. The importance of context in implementation research. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2014; 67 (Suppl 2): S157–62. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000322.
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17225/jhp00155 | Journal eISSN: 2055-3390
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 24
Published on: Jun 8, 2020
Published by: Haemnet Ltd
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Pain assessment,
chronic pain,
bleeding disorders,
patient-provider communication,
tool development
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Basic medical science,
Basic medical science, other,
Clinical medicine,
Clinical medicine, other,
Pharmacy,
Pharmacology

© 2020 Susan M Tupper, JoAnn Nilson, Jennifer King, Pamela Downe, Nancy Hodgson, Tara Schlosser, Kelsey Brose, published by Haemnet Ltd
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 7 (2020): Issue 1 (January 2020)Next article