Exploring Satellite-Derived Relationships between Cloud Droplet Number Concentration and Liquid Water Path Using a Large-Domain Large-Eddy Simulation

Sudhakar Dipu; Matthias Schwarz; Annica M. L. Ekman; Edward Gryspeerdt; Tom Goren; Odran Sourdeval; Johannes Mülmenstädt; Johannes Quaas

doi:10.16993/tellusb.27

Exploring Satellite-Derived Relationships between Cloud Droplet Number Concentration and Liquid Water Path Using a Large-Domain Large-Eddy Simulation

Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology

Volume 74 (2022): Issue 1

By: Sudhakar Dipu , Matthias Schwarz , Annica M. L. Ekman , Edward Gryspeerdt , Tom Goren , Odran Sourdeval , Johannes Mülmenstädt and Johannes Quaas

Open Access

|Sep 2022

Abstract

Important aspects of the adjustments to aerosol-cloud interactions can be examined using the relationship between cloud droplet number concentration (N_d) and liquid water path (LWP). Specifically, this relation can constrain the role of aerosols in leading to thicker or thinner clouds in response to adjustment mechanisms. This study investigates the satellite retrieved relationship between N_d and LWP for a selected case of mid-latitude continental clouds using high-resolution Large-eddy simulations (LES) over a large domain in weather prediction mode. Since the satellite retrieval uses the adiabatic assumption to derive the N_d, we have also considered adiabatic N_d (N_Ad) from the LES model for comparison. The joint histogram analysis shows that the N_Ad-LWP relationship in the LES model and the satellite is in approximate agreement. In both cases, the peak conditional probability (CP) is confined to lower N_Ad and LWP; the corresponding mean LWP (LWP) shows a weak relation with N_Ad. The CP shows a larger spread at higher N_Ad (>50 cm^–3), and the LWP increases non-monotonically with increasing N_Ad in both cases. Nevertheless, both lack the negative N_Ad-LWP relationship at higher N_Ad, the entrainment effect on cloud droplets. In contrast, the model simulated N_d-LWP clearly illustrates a much more nonlinear (an increase in LWP with increasing N_d and a decrease in LWP at higher N_d) relationship, which clearly depicts the cloud lifetime and the entrainment effect. Additionally, our analysis demonstrates a regime dependency (marine and continental) in the N_Ad-LWP relation from the satellite retrievals. Comparing local vs large-scale statistics from satellite data shows that continental clouds exhibit only a weak nonlinear N_Ad-LWP relationship. Hence a regime-based N_d-LWP analysis is even more relevant when it comes to warm continental clouds and their comparison to satellite retrievals.

References

Ackerman, AS, Kirkpatrick, MP, Stevens, DE and Toon, OB. 2004. The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing. Nature, 432(7020): 1014–1017. DOI: 10.1038/nature03174
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Albrecht, BA. 1989. Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science, 245(4923): 1227–1230. DOI: 10.1126/science.245.4923.1227
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baldauf, M, Seifert, A, Förstner, J, Majewski, D, Raschendorfer, M and Reinhardt, T. 2011. Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the cosmo model: Description and sensitivities. Mon. Weather Rev., 139(12): 3887–3905. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bellouin, N, Quaas, J, Gryspeerdt, E, Kinne, S, Stier, P, Watson-Parris, D, Boucher, O, Carslaw, K, Christensen, M, Daniau, A-L, Dufresne, J-L, Feingold, G, Fiedler, S, Forster, P, Gettelman, A, Haywood, JM, Lohmann, U, Malavelle, F, Mauritsen, T, McCoy, D, Myhre, G, Mülmenstädt, J, Neubauer, D, Possner, A, Rugenstein, M, Sato, Y, Schulz, M, Schwartz, SE, Sourdeval, O, Storelvmo, T, Toll, V, Winker, D and Stevens, B. 2020. Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change. Rev. Geophys., 58: e2019RG000660. DOI: 10.1029/2019RG000660
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bennartz, R and Rausch, J. 2017. Global and regional estimates of warm cloud droplet number concentration based on 13 years of aqua-modis observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17(16): 9815–9836. DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-9815-2017
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Braun, RA, Dadashazar, H, MacDonald, AB, Crosbie, E, Jonsson, HH, Woods, RK, Flagan, RC, Seinfeld, JH and Sorooshian, A. 2018. Cloud adiabaticity and its relationship to marine stratocumulus characteristics over the northeast pacific ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 123(24): 13,790–13,806. DOI: 10.1029/2018JD029287
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brenguier, J-L, Pawlowska, H, Schüller, L, Preusker, R, Fischer, J and Fouquart, Y. 2000. Radiative properties of boundary layer clouds: Droplet effective radius versus number concentration. J. Atmos. Sci., 57(6): 803–821. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<;0803:RPOBLC>2.0.CO;2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bulatovic, I, Ekman, AML, Savre, J, Riipinen, I and Leck, C. 2019. Aerosol indirect effects in marine stratocumulus: The importance of explicitly predicting cloud droplet activation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46(6): 3473–3481. DOI: 10.1029/2018GL081746
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Charlson, RJ, Schwartz, SE, Hales, JM, Cess, RD, Coakley, JA, Hansen, JE and Hofmann, DJ. 1992. Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols. Science, 255(5043): 423–430. DOI: 10.1126/science.255.5043.423
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Chen, Y-C, Christensen, MW, Stephens, GL and Seinfeld, JH. 2014. Satellite-based estimate of global aerosol-cloud radiative forcing by marine warm clouds. Nat. Geosci., 7(9): 643–646. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2214
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, MW, Jones, WK and Stier, P. 2020. Aerosols enhance cloud lifetime and brightness along the stratus-to-cumulus transition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 117b: 17591–17598. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921231117
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, MW, Neubauer, D, Poulsen, CA, Thomas, GE, McGarragh, GR, Povey, AC, Proud, SR and Grainger, RG. 2017. Unveiling aerosol–cloud interactions – part 1: Cloud contamination in satellite products enhances the aerosol indirect forcing estimate. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17(21): 13151–13164. DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-13151-2017
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costa-Surós, M, Sourdeval, O, Acquistapace, C, Baars, H, Carbajal Henken, C, Genz, C, Hesemann, J, Jimenez, C, König, M, Kretzschmar, J, Madenach, N, Meyer, CI, Schrödner, R, Seifert, P, Senf, F, Brueck, M, Cioni, G, Engels, JF, Fieg, K, Gorges, K, Heinze, R, Siligam, PK, Burkhardt, U, Crewell, S, Hoose, C, Seifert, A, Tegen, I and Quaas, J. 2020. Detection and attribution of aerosol–cloud interactions in large-domain large-eddy simulations with the icosahedral non-hydrostatic model. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20(9): 5657–5678. DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-5657-2020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dipankar, A, Stevens, B, Heinze, R, Moseley, C, Zn̈gl, G, Giorgetta, M and Brdar, S. 2015. Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model icon. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7(3): 963–986. DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000431
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Feingold, G, Eberhard, WL, Veron, DE and Previdi, M. 2003. First measurements of the twomey indirect effect using ground-based remote sensors. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(6): DOI: 10.1029/2002GL016633
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forster, P, Storelvmo, T, Armour, K, Collins, W, Dufresne, J-L, Frame, D, Lunt, D, Mauritsen, T, Palmera, M, Watanabea, M, Wild, M and Zhang, H. 2021. The Earth’s Energy Budget, Climate Feedbacks, and Climate Sensitivity. In Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Pirani, A, Connors, SL, Péan, C, Berger, S, Caud, N, Chen, Y, Goldfarb, L, Gomis, MI, Huang, M, Leitzell, K, Lonnoy, E, Matthews, JBR, Maycock, TK, Waterfield, T, Yelekçi, O, Yu, R and Zhou, B (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Chapter 7). Cambridge University Press. In Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glassmeier, F, Hoffmann, F, Johnson, JS, Yamaguchi, T, Carslaw, KS and Feingold, G. 2021. Aerosol-cloud-climate cooling overestimated by ship-track data. Science, 371: 485–489. DOI: 10.1126/science.abd3980
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grosvenor, DP, Sourdeval, O, Zuidema, P, Ackerman, A, Alexandrov, MD, Bennartz, R, Boers, R, Cairns, B, Chiu, JC, Christensen, M, Deneke, H, Diamond, M, Feingold, G, Fridlind, A, Hünerbein, A, Knist, C, Kollias, P, Marshak, A, McCoy, D, Merk, D, Painemal, D, Rausch, J, Rosenfeld, D, Russchenberg, H, Seifert, P, Sinclair, K, Stier, P, van Diedenhoven, B, Wendisch, M, Werner, F, Wood, R, Zhang, Z and Quaas, J. 2018. Remote sensing of droplet number concentration in warm clouds: A review of the current state of knowledge and perspectives. Rev. Geophys., 56(2): 409–453. DOI: 10.1029/2017RG000593
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grosvenor, DP and Wood, R. 2014. The effect of solar zenith angle on modis cloud optical and microphysical retrievals within marine liquid water clouds. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14(14): 7291–7321. DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-7291-2014
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gryspeerdt, E, Goren, T and Smith, TWP. 2021. Observing the timescales of aerosol–cloud interactions in snapshot satellite images. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21: 6093–6109. DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-6093-2021
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gryspeerdt, E, Goren, T, Sourdeval, O, Quaas, J, Mülmenstädt, J, Dipu, S, Unglaub, C, Gettelman, A and Christensen, M. 2019. Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud liquid water path. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19(8): 5331–5347. DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-5331-2019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gryspeerdt, E, Quaas, J and Bellouin, N. 2016. Constraining the aerosol influence on cloud fraction. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121(7): 3566–3583. DOI: 10.1002/2015JD023744
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hasekamp, OP, Gryspeerdt, E and Quaas, J. 2019. Analysis of polarimetric satellite measurements suggests stronger cooling due to aerosol-cloud interactions. Nat. Commun., 10(1): 5405. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13372-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heiblum, RH, Pinto, L, Altaratz, O, Dagan, G and Koren, I. 2019. Core and margin in warm convective clouds – part 1: Core types and evolution during a cloud’s lifetime. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19(16): 10717–10738. DOI: 10.5194/acp-19-10717-2019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heinze, R, Dipankar, A, Henken, CC, Moseley, C, Sourdeval, O, Trömel, S, Xie, X, Adamidis, P, Ament, F, Baars, H, Barthlott, C, Behrendt, A, Blahak, U, Bley, S, Brdar, S, Brueck, M, Crewell, S, Deneke, H, Di Girolamo, P, Evaristo, R, Fischer, J, Frank, C, Friederichs, P, Göcke, T, Gorges, K, Hande, L, Hanke, M, Hansen, A, Hege, H-C, Hoose, C, Jahns, T, Kalthoff, N, Klocke, D, Kneifel, S, Knippertz, P, Kuhn, A, van Laar, T, Macke, A, Maurer, V, Mayer, B, Meyer, CI, Muppa, SK, Neggers, RAJ, Orlandi, E, Pantillon, F, Pospichal, B, Röber, N, Scheck, L, Seifert, A, Seifert, P, Senf, F, Siligam, P, Simmer, C, Steinke, S, Stevens, B, Wapler, K, Weniger, M, Wulfmeyer, V, Zängl, G, Zhang, D and Quaas, J. 2017. Large-eddy simulations over germany using icon: a comprehensive evaluation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 143(702): 69–100. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2947
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jia, H, Ma, X, Yu, F and Quaas, J. 2021. Significant underestimation of radiative forcing by aerosol–cloud interactions derived from satellite-based methods. Nat. Commun., 12(1): 3649. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23888-1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koren, I, Dagan, G and Altaratz, O. 2014. From aerosol-limited to invigoration of warm convective clouds. Science, 344(6188): 1143–1146. DOI: 10.1126/science.1252595
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lilly, DK. 1962. On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection. Tellus, 14(2): 148–172. DOI: 10.1111/j.2153-3490.1962.tb00128.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Löhnert, U, Schween, JH, Acquistapace, C, Ebell, K, Maahn, M, Barrera-Verdejo, M, Hirsikko, A, Bohn, B, Knaps, A, O’Connor, E, Simmer, C, Wahner, A and Crewell, S. 2015. Joyce: Jülich observatory for cloud evolution. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96(7): 1157–1174. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00105.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Madhavan, BL, Kalisch, J and Macke, A. 2016. Shortwave surface radiation network for observing small-scale cloud inhomogeneity fields. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9(3): 1153–1166. DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-1153-2016
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McCoy, DT, Bender, FA-M, Mohrmann, JKC, Hartmann, DL, Wood, R and Grosvenor, DP. 2017. The global aerosol-cloud first indirect effect estimated using modis, merra, and aerocom. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 122(3): 1779–1796. DOI: 10.1002/2016JD026141
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Menzel, W, Frey, R and Baum, B. 2015. Terra/modis cloud product 5-min l2 swath 1 km and 5 km, c6, nasa level-1 and atmosphere archive & distribution system (laads) distributed active archive center (daac). Greenbelt, MD: Goddard Space Flight Center. DOI: 10.5067/MODIS/MOD06_L2.006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Michibata, T, Suzuki, K, Sato, Y and Takemura, T. 2016. The source of discrepancies in aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions between gcm and a-train retrievals. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16(23): 15413–15424. DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-15413-2016
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mülmenstädt, J and Feingold, G. 2018. The radiative forcing of aerosol-cloud interactions in liquid clouds: Wrestling and embracing uncertainty. Curr. Clim. Chang. Rep., 4(1): 23–40. DOI: 10.1007/s40641-018-0089-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Nakajima, T, Higurashi, A, Kawamoto, K and Penner, JE. 2001. A possible correlation between satellite-derived cloud and aerosol microphysical parameters. Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(7): 1171–1174. DOI: 10.1029/2000GL012186
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Platnick, S, Meyer, KG, King, MD, Wind, G, Amarasinghe, N, Marchant, B, Arnold, GT, Zhang, Z, Hubanks, PA, Holz, RE, Yang, P, Ridgway, WL and Riedi, J. 2017. The modis cloud optical and microphysical products: Collection 6 updates and examples from terra and aqua. DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2016.2610522
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quaas, J, Arola, A, Cairns, B, Christensen, M, Deneke, H, Ekman, AML, Feingold, G, Fridlind, A, Gryspeerdt, E, Hasekamp, O, Li, Z, Lipponen, A, Ma, P-L, Mülmenstädt, J, Nenes, A, Penner, JE, Rosenfeld, D, Schrödner, R, Sinclair, K, Sourdeval, O, Stier, P, Tesche, M, van Diedenhoven, B and Wendisch, M. 2020. Constraining the twomey effect from satellite observations: issues and perspectives. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20(23): 15079–15099. DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-15079-2020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quaas, J, Boucher, O, Bellouin, N and Kinne, S. 2008. Satellite-based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113(D5). DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008962
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quaas, J, Boucher, O and Bréon, F-M. 2004. Aerosol indirect effects in polder satellite data and the laboratoire de météorologie dynamique–zoom (lmdz) general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 109(D8). DOI: 10.1029/2003JD004317
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Quaas, J, Boucher, O and Lohmann, U. 2006. Constraining the total aerosol indirect effect in the lmdz and echam4 gcms using modis satellite data. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6(4): 947–955. DOI: 10.5194/acp-6-947-2006
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ramanathan, V, Cess, RD, Harrison, EF, Minnis, P, Barkstrom, BR, Ahmad, E and Hartmann, D. 1989. Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: Results from the earth radiation budget experiment. Science, 243(4887): 57–63. DOI: 10.1126/science.243.4887.57
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosenfeld, D, Sherwood, S, Wood, R and Donner, L. 2014. Climate effects of aerosol-cloud interactions. Science, 343(6169): 379–380. DOI: 10.1126/science.1247490
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Saponaro, G, Sporre, MK, Neubauer, D, Kokkola, H, Kolmonen, P, Sogacheva, L, Arola, A, de Leeuw, G, Karset, IHH, Laaksonen, A and Lohmann, U. 2020. Evaluation of aerosol and cloud properties in three climate models using modis observations and its corresponding cosp simulator, as well as their application in aerosol–cloud interactions. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20(3): 1607–1626. DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-1607-2020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sato, Y, Goto, D, Michibata, T, Suzuki, K, Takemura, T, Tomita, H and Nakajima, T. 2018. Aerosol effects on cloud water amounts were successfully simulated by a global cloud-system resolving model. Nat. Commun., 9(1): 985. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03379-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schüller, L, Bennartz, R, Fischer, J and Brenguier, J-L. 2005. An algorithm for the retrieval of droplet number concentration and geometrical thickness of stratiform marine boundary layer clouds applied to modis radiometric observations. J. Appl. Meteorol., 44(1): 28–38. DOI: 10.1175/JAM-2185.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seifert, A and Beheng, KD. 2006. A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. part 1: Model description. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92(1): 45–66. DOI: 10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sekiguchi, M, Nakajima, T, Suzuki, K, Kawamoto, K, Higurashi, A, Rosenfeld, D, Sano, I and Mukai, S. 2003. A study of the direct and indirect effects of aerosols using global satellite data sets of aerosol and cloud parameters. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108(D22). DOI: 10.1029/2002JD003359
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sommeria, G and Deardorff, J. 1977. Subgrid-scale condensation in models of nonprecipitating clouds. J. Atmos. Sci., 34: 344–355. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<;0344:SSCIMO>2.0.CO;2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stephens, GL, Christensen, M, Andrews, T, Haywood, J, Malavelle, FF, Suzuki, K, Jing, X, Lebsock, M, Li, J-LF, Takahashi, H and Sy, O. 2019. Cloud physics from space. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 145(724): 2854–2875. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3589
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stevens, B and Feingold, G. 2009. Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system. Nature, 461(7264): 607–613. DOI: 10.1038/nature08281
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Suzuki, K, Stephens, GL and Lebsock, MD. 2013. Aerosol effect on the warm rain formation process: Satellite observations and modeling. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 118(1): 170–184. DOI: 10.1002/jgrd.50043
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Szopa, S, Naik, V, Adhikary, B, Artaxo, P, Berntsen, T, Collins, W, Fuzzi, S, Gallardo, L, Scharr, AK, Klimont, Z, Liao, H, Unger, N and Zanis, P. 2021. Short-Lived Climate Forcers. In Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Pirani, A, Connors, SL, Péan, C, Berger, S, Caud, N, Chen, Y, Goldfarb, L, Gomis, MI, Huang, M, Leitzell, K, Lonnoy, E, Matthews, JBR, Maycock, TK, Waterfield, T, Yelekçi, O, Yu, R and Zhou, B (eds.), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Chapter 6). Cambridge University Press. In Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Toll, V, Christensen, M, Quaas, J and Bellouin, N. 2019. Weak average liquid-cloud-water response to anthropogenic aerosols. Nature, 572: 51–55. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1423-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Twomey, S. 1974. Pollution and the planetary albedo. Atmos. Environ., 8(12): 1251–1256. DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(74)90004-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Unglaub, C, Block, K, Mülmenstädt, J, Sourdeval, O and Quaas, J. 2020. A new classification of satellite-derived liquid water cloud regimes at cloud scale. Atmos. Chem. Phys, 20(4): 2407–2418. DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-2407-2020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xue, H and Feingold, G. 2006. Large-eddy simulations of trade wind cumuli: Investigation of aerosol indirect effects. J. Atmos. Sci, 63(6): 1605–1622. DOI: 10.1175/JAS3706.1
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zängl, G, Reinert, D, Rṕodas, P and Baldauf, M. 2015. The icon (icosahedral non-hydrostatic) modelling framework of dwd and mpi-m: Description of the non-hydrostatic dynamical core. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 141(687): 563–579. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2378
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.27 | Journal eISSN: 1600-0889

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 176 - 188

Submitted on: Feb 11, 2022

Accepted on: Aug 28, 2022

Published on: Sep 16, 2022

Published by: Stockholm University Press

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Keywords:

Aerosol-cloud interaction,

Cloud droplet number concentration,

Liquid water path

© 2022 Sudhakar Dipu, Matthias Schwarz, Annica M. L. Ekman, Edward Gryspeerdt, Tom Goren, Odran Sourdeval, Johannes Mülmenstädt, Johannes Quaas, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 74 (2022): Issue 1