Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Early Development and Tuning of a Global Coupled Cloud Resolving Model, and its Fast Response to Increasing CO2 Cover

Early Development and Tuning of a Global Coupled Cloud Resolving Model, and its Fast Response to Increasing CO2

Open Access
|Sep 2022

References

  1. Amdahl, GM. 1967. Validity of single processor approach to achieving large scale computing capabilities. AFIPS Conference Proceedings, 30: 483485.
  2. Armour, KC, Bitz, CM and Roe, GH. 2013. Time-Varying Climate Sensitivity from Regional Feedbacks. Journal of Climate, 26(13): 45184534. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00544.1
  3. Balaji, V, et al. 2022. Are GCMs obsolete? Manuscript submitted.
  4. Baldauf, M, Seifert, A, Foerstner, J, Majewski, D, Raschendorfer, M and Reinhardt, T. 2011. Operational convective-scale numerical weather prediction with the COSMO model: Description and sensitivities. Monthly Weather Review, 139(12): 38873905. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-10-05013.1
  5. Bjerknes, V. 1904. Das Problem der Wettervorhersage, betrachtet vom Standpunkte der Mechanik und der Physik. Meteorol. Z., 21: 17.
  6. Bolin, B. 1955. Numerical forecasting with the barotropic model. Tellus, 7: 2749. DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v7i1.8770
  7. Bony, S, Bellon, G, Klocke, D, et al. 2013. Robust direct effect of carbon dioxide on tropical circulation and regional precipitation. Nature Geosci, 6: 447451. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo1799
  8. Bony, S, Stevens, B, Ament, F, et al. 2017. EUREC4A: A Field Campaign to Elucidate the Couplings Between Clouds, Convection and Circulation. Surv Geophys, 38: 15291568. DOI: 10.1007/s10712-017-9428-0
  9. Charney, JG, Fjörtoft, R and von Neumann, J. 1950. Numerical integration of the barotropic vorticity equation. Tellus, 2(4): 237254. DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v2i4.8607
  10. Deardorff, J. 1970. A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 41(2): 453480. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112070000691
  11. Dipankar, A, Stevens, B, Heinze, R, Moseley, C, Zängl, G, Giorgetta, M and Brdar, S. 2015. Large eddy simulation using the general circulation model ICON. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7: 963986. DOI: 10.1002/2015MS000431
  12. Fiedler, S, Crueger, T, D’Agostino, R, et al. 2020. Simulated Tropical Precipitation Assessed across Three Major Phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). Mon. Wea. Rev., 148: 36533680. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0404.1
  13. Flynn, C and Mauritsen, T. 2020. On the climate sensitivity and historical warming evolution in recentcoupled model ensembles. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20: 78297842. DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-7829-2020
  14. Fuhrer, O, Chadha, T, Hoefler, T, Kwasniewski, G, Lapillonne, X, Leutwyler, D, Lüthi, D, Osuna, C, Schär, C, Schulthess, TC and Vogt, H. 2018. Near-global climate simulation at 1 km resolution: establishing a performance baseline on 4888 GPUs with COSMO 5.0. Geosci. Model Dev., 11: 16651681. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-1665-2018
  15. Giorgetta, MA, Brokopf, R, Crueger, T, Esch, M, Fiedler, S, Helmert, J, Hohenegger, C, Kornblueh, L, Köhler, M, Manzini, E, Mauritsen, T, Nam, C, Raddatz, T, Rast, S, Reinert, D, Sakradzija, M, Schmidt, H, Schneck, R, Schnur, R, Silvers, L, Wan, H, Zängl, G and Stevens, B. 2018. ICON-A, the atmosphere component of the ICON Earth system model: I. Model description. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 10: 16131637. DOI: 10.1029/2017MS001242
  16. Gregory, JM, Ingram, WJ, Palmer, MA, Jones, GS, Stott, PA, Thorpe, RB, Lowe, JA, Johns, TC and Williams, KD. 2004. A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31: L03205. DOI: 10.1029/2003GL018747
  17. Hanke, M and Redler, R. 2019. New features with YAC 1.5.0. Reports on ICON, No 3. DOI: 10.5676/DWD_pub/nwv/icon_003
  18. Hanke, M, Redler, R, Holfeld, T and Yastremsky, M. 2016. YAC 1.2.0: new aspects for coupling software in Earth system modelling. Geosci. Model Dev., 9: 27552769. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-9-2755-2016
  19. Heikes, RH and Randall, DA. 1995a. Numerical integration of the shallow- water equations on a twisted icosahedral grid. Part I: Basic design and results of tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123: 18621880. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<;1862:NIOTSW>2.0.CO;2
  20. Heikes, RH and Randall, DA. 1995b. Numerical integration of the shallow- water equations on a twisted icosahedral grid. Part II: A detailed description of the grid and analysis of numerical accuracy. Mon. Wea. Rev., 123: 18811887. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<;1881:NIOTSW>2.0.CO;2
  21. Heinze, R, Dipankar, A, Henken, CC, Moseley, C, Sourdeval, O, Trömel, S, Xie, X, Adamidis, P, Ament, F, Baars, H, Barthlott, C, Behrendt, A, Blahak, U, Bley, S, Brdar, S, Brueck, M, Crewell, S, Deneke, H, Di Girolamo, P, Evaristo, R, Fischer, J, Frank, C, Friederichs, P, Göcke, T, Gorges, K, Hande, L, Hanke, M, Hansen, A, Hege, H-C, Hoose, C, Jahns, T, Kalthoff, N, Klocke, D, Kneifel, S, Knippertz, P, Kuhn, A, van Laar, T, Macke, A, Maurer, V, Mayer, B, Meyer, CI, Muppa, SK, Neggers, RAJ, Orlandi, E, Pantillon, F, Pospichal, B, Röber, N, Scheck, L, Seifert, A, Seifert, P, Senf, F, Siligam, P, Simmer, C, Steinke, S, Stevens, B, Wapler, K, Weniger, M, Wulfmeyer, V, Zängl, G, Zhang, D and Quaas, J. 2017. Large-eddy simulations over Germany using ICON: a comprehensive evaluation. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 143: 69100. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2947
  22. Held, IM, Winton, M, Takahashi, K, Delworth, T, Zeng, F and Vallis, GK. 2010. Probing the Fast and Slow Components of Global Warming by Returning Abruptly to Preindustrial Forcing. Journal of Climate, 23(9): 24182427. DOI: 10.1175/2009JCLI3466.1
  23. Hohenegger, C, Kornblueh, L, Klocke, D, Becker, T, Cioni, G, Engels, JF, Schulzweida, U and Stevens, B. 2020. Climate statistics in global simulations of the atmosphere, from 80 to 2.5 km grid spacing. J. Meteorol. Society Japan, 98: 7391. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2020-005
  24. Hohenegger, C, Korn, P, Linardakis, L, Redler, R, Schnur, R, Adamidis, P, Bao, J, Bastin, S, Behravesh, M, Bergemann, M, Biercamp, J, Bockelmann, H, Brokopf, R, Bruggemann, N, Esch, M, George, G, Giorgetta, MA, Gutjahr, O, Haak, H, Hanke, M, Jahns, T, Jungclaus, J, Kern, M, Klocke, D, Kluft, L, Kornblueh, L, Kosukhin, SS, Kroll, C, Lee, J, Luschow, V, Mauritsen, T, Müller, R, Naumann, AK, Paccini, L, Panos, S, Praturi, D, Putrasahan, D, Rast, S, Riddick, T, Roeber, N, Schmidt, H, Schulzweida, U, Segura, H, Shevchenko, R, Singh, V, Specht, MS, Stephan, C, von Storch, J-S, Vogel, R, Wengel, C, Winkler, M, Ziemen, F and Stevens, B. 2022. The ICON Sapphire model: a climate modeling system designed for applications at kilo- and subkilometer scales. In preparation.
  25. Hohenegger, C and Stevens, B. 2018. The role of the permanent wilting point in controlling the spatial distribution of precipitation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 115: 56925697. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718842115
  26. Hourdin, F, Mauritsen, T, Gettelman, A, Golaz, J, Balaji, V, Duan, Q, Folini, D, Ji, D, Klocke, D, Qian, Y, Rauser, F, Rio, C, Tomassini, L, Watanabe, M and Williamson, D. 2017. The Art and Science of Climate Model Tuning. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98(3): 589602. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00135.1
  27. Hyder, P, Edwards, J, Allan, RP, et al. 2018. Critical Southern Ocean climate model biases traced to atmospheric model cloud errors. Nature Communication, 9: 3625. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05634-2
  28. Jungclaus, JH, et al. 2021. The ICON Earth System Model Version 1.0. Earth and Space Science Open Archive. DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10507989.1
  29. Klemp, JB and Wilhelmson, RB. 1978. The Simulation of Three-Dimensional Convective Storm Dynamics. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 35(6): 10701096. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<;1070:TSOTDC>2.0.CO;2
  30. Korn, P and Linardakis, L. 2018. A conservative discretization of the shallow-water equations on triangular grid. J. Comp. Phys., 375: 871900. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.09.002
  31. Loeb, NG, Doelling, DR, Wang, H, Su, W, Nguyen, C, Corbett, JG, Liang, L, Mitrescu, C, Rose, FG and Kato, S. 2018. Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System (CERES) Energy Balanced and Filled (EBAF) Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) Edition-4.0 Data Product. J. Climate, 31: 895918. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0208.1
  32. Lorenz, EN. 1969. The predictability of a flow which possesses manyscales of motion. Tellus, 21(3): 289307. DOI: 10.3402/tellusa.v21i3.10086
  33. Lott, F. 1999. Alleviation of stationary biases in a GCM through a mountain drag parameterization scheme and a simple representation of mountain lift forces. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127: 788801. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1999)127<;0788:AOSBIA>2.0.CO;2
  34. Manabe, S and Bryan, K. 1969. Climate calculations with a combined ocean-atmosphere model. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 26(4): 786789. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1969)026<;0786:CCWACO>2.0.CO;2
  35. Manabe, S, Smagorinski, J and Strickler, RF. 1965. Simulated climatology of a general circulation model with a hydrological cycle. Monthly Weather Review, 93(12): 769798. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1965)093<;0769:SCOAGC>2.3.CO;2
  36. Mauritsen, T, et al. 2012. Tuning the climate of a global model. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 4: M00A01. DOI: 10.1029/2012MS000154
  37. Mauritsen, T, Bader, J, Becker, T, Behrens, J, Bittner, M, Brokopf, R, et al. 2019. Developments in the MPI-M Earth System Model version 1.2 (MPI-ESM1.2) and its response to increasing CO2. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11: 9981038. DOI: 10.1029/2018MS001400
  38. Moore, GE. 1965. Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics Magazine, 38.
  39. Morice, CP, Kennedy, JJ, Rayner, NA, Winn, JP, Hogan, E, Killick, RE, Dunn, RJH, Osborn, TJ, Jones, PD and Simpson, IR. 2021. An updated assessment of near-surface temperature change from 1850: the HadCRUT5 dataset. Journal of Geophysical Research. DOI: 10.1029/2019JD032361
  40. Palmer, T and Stevens, B. 2019. The scientific challenge of understanding and estimating climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 116(49): 2439024395. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906691116
  41. Phillips, NA. 1956. The general circulation of the atmosphere: A numerical experiment. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc., 82: 123164. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49708235202
  42. Pithan, F, Angevine, W and Mauritsen, T. 2015. Improving a global model from the boundary layer: Total turbulent energy and the neutral limit Prandtl number. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7. DOI: 10.1002/2014MS000382
  43. Radtke, J, Mauritsen, T and Hohenegger, C. 2021. Shallow cumulus cloud feedback in large eddy simulations – bridging the gap to storm-resolving models. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21: 32753288. DOI: 10.5194/acp-21-3275-2021
  44. Retsch, MH, Mauritsen, T and Hohenegger, C. 2019. Climate change feedbacks in aquaplanet experiments with explicit and parametrized convection for horizontal resolutions of 2,525 up to 5 km. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11: 20702088. DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001677
  45. Richardson, LF. 1922. Weather prediction by numerical process. Cambridge University Press, 258 pp.
  46. Satoh, M. 2014. Atmospheric Circulation Dynamics and General Circulation Models. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-13574-3
  47. Schneider, T, Lan, S, Stuart, A and Teixeira, J. 2017. Earth system modeling 2.0: A blueprint for models that learn from observations and targeted high-resolution simulations. Geophysical Research Letters, 44: 1239612417. DOI: 10.1002/2017GL076101
  48. Shepherd, T. 2014. Atmospheric circulation as a source of uncertainty in climate change projections. Nature Geosci, 7: 703708. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2253
  49. Smith, RD, Maltrud, ME, Bryan, F and Hecht, MW. 2000. Numerical simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean at 1/10°. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 30: 15321561. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<;1532:NSOTNA>2.0.CO;2
  50. Stevens, B, et al. 2021. EUREC4A. Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13: 40674119. DOI: 10.5194/essd-13-4067-2021
  51. Stevens, B, Satoh, M, Auger, L, et al. 2019. DYAMOND: the DYnamics of the Atmospheric general circulation Modeled On Non-hydrostatic Domains. Prog Earth Planet Sci., 6: 61. DOI: 10.1186/s40645-019-0304-z
  52. Sundqvist, H, Berge, E and Kristjánsson, JE. 1989. Condensation and Cloud Parameterization Studies with a Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Model. Monthly Weather Review, 117(8): 16411657. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<;1641:CACPSW>2.0.CO;2
  53. Tiedtke, M. 1989. A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterization in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev., 117: 17791800. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<;1779:ACMFSF>2.0.CO;2
  54. Tomita, H, Miura, H, Iga, S, Nasuno, T and Satoh, M. 2005. A global cloud-resolving simulation: Preliminary results from an aqua planet experiment. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(8): 3283. DOI: 10.1029/2005GL022459
  55. Tomita, H, Satoh, M and Goto, K. 2002. An optimization of icosahedral grid modified by spring dynamics. J. Comp. Phys., 183: 307331. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7193
  56. Tomita, H, Tsugawa, M, Satoh, M and Goto, K. 2001. Shallow water model on a modified icosahedral geodesic grid by using spring dynamics. J. Comp. Phys., 174: 579613. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6897
  57. Uribe, A, Vial, J and Mauritsen, T. 2021. Sensitivity of tropical extreme precipitation to surface warming in aquaplanet experiments using a global nonhydrostatic model. Geophysical Research Letters, 48: e2020GL091371. DOI: 10.1029/2020GL091371
  58. Wan, H, Rasch, PJ, Zhang, K, Qian, Y, Yan, H and Zhao, C. 2014. Short ensembles: an efficient method for discerning climate-relevant sensitivities in atmospheric general circulation models. Geosci. Model Dev., 7: 19611977. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-7-1961-2014
  59. Wang, C, Zhang, L, Lee, SK, Wu, L and Mechoso, CR. 2014. A global perspective on CMIP5 climate model biases. Nature Climate Change, 4: 201205. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2118
  60. Washington, WM, Buja, L and Craig, A. 2008. The computational future for climate and Earth system models: on the path to petaflop and beyond. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A., 367833846. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0219
  61. Weller, H, Weller, HG and Fournier, A. 2009. Voronoi, Delaunay, and Block-Structured Mesh Refinement for Solution of the Shallow-Water Equations on the Sphere. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137: 42084224. DOI: 10.1175/2009MWR2917.1
  62. Williams, KD, Bodas-Salcedo, A, Déqué, M, Fermepin, S, Medeiros, B, Watanabe, M, Jakob, C, Klein, SA, Senior, CA and Williamson, DL. 2013. The Transpose-AMIP II Experiment and Its Application to the Understanding of Southern Ocean Cloud Biases in Climate Models. Journal of Climate, 26(10): 32583274. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00429.1
  63. Winton, M, Takahashi, K and Held, IM. 2010. Importance of Ocean Heat Uptake Efficacy to Transient Climate Change. Journal of Climate, 23(9): 23332344. DOI: 10.1175/2009JCLI3139.1
  64. Yashiro, H, Terai, M, Yoshida, R, Iga, S-I, Minami, K and Tomita, H. 2016. Performance Analysis and Optimization of Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM) on the K Computer and TSUBAME2.5. In: Proceedings of the Platform for Advanced Scientific Computing Conference on ZZZ – PASC’16. ACM Press. DOI: 10.1145/2929908.2929911
  65. Zelinka, MD, Myers, TA, McCoy, DT, Po-Chedley, S, Caldwell, PM, Ceppi, P, et al. 2020. Causes of higher climate sensitivity in CMIP6 models. Geophysical Research Letters, 47: e2019GL085782. DOI: 10.1029/2019GL085782
  66. Zhou, C, Zelinka, M and Klein, S. 2016. Impact of decadal cloud variations on the Earth’s energy budget. Nature Geosci, 9: 871874. DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2828
  67. Zuidema, P, Chang, P, Medeiros, B, Kirtman, BP, Mechoso, R, Schneider, EK, Toniazzo, T, Richter, I, Small, RJ, Bellomo, K, Brandt, P, de Szoeke, S, Farrar, JT, Jung, E, Kato, S, Li, M, Patricola, C, Wang, Z, Wood, R and Xu, Z. 2016. Challenges and Prospects for Reducing Coupled Climate Model SST Biases in the Eastern Tropical Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: The U.S. CLIVAR Eastern Tropical Oceans Synthesis Working Group. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(12): 23052328. DOI: 10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00274.1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusa.54 | Journal eISSN: 3035-9554
Language: English
Page range: 346 - 363
Submitted on: Apr 22, 2022
Accepted on: Aug 16, 2022
Published on: Sep 2, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Thorsten Mauritsen, Rene Redler, Monika Esch, Bjorn Stevens, Cathy Hohenegger, Daniel Klocke, Renate Brokopf, Helmuth Haak, Leonidas Linardakis, Niklas Röber, Reiner Schnur, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.