Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Comparison of Sea Surface Temperature Perturbation Methods for a Convection Permitting Ensemble Prediction System Over the European Arctic Cover

A Comparison of Sea Surface Temperature Perturbation Methods for a Convection Permitting Ensemble Prediction System Over the European Arctic

Open Access
|Aug 2023

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The AROME-Arctic domain shown by the blue rectangle.

Table 1

Case study periods and periods used for SST error estimation.

DATENAMEEVENTPERIOD FOR ERROR ESTIMATION
2019-10-29 to 2019-10-31PLPolar low2019-10-28 to 2019-11-03
2020-01-04 to 2020-01-05CAO ICold air outbreak2019-12-30 to 2020-01-05
2020-02-04 to 2020-02-05STRStorm over northern Norway2020-02-03 to 2020-02-09
2020-03-10 to 2020-03-12CAO IICold air outbreak2020-03-09 to 2020-03-15
ALLAll case studies together
Figure 2

Error estimation fields, ɛ – a) 2018; b) 2019-10-28 to 2019-11-03; c) 2019-12-30 to 2020-01-05; d) 2020-02-03 to 2020-02-09; e) 2020-03-09 to 2020-03-15.

Figure 3

Histograms of perturbations for each experiment.

Figure 4

Mean absolute SST perturbations for OPERATIONAL (top left panel), REFERENCE (top right panel), TSSTP (bottom left panel) and TSSTP_weekly_pert (bottom right panel) for each experiment period individually.

Figure 5

Synoptic situation during PL case study. Satellite image and mean sea level pressure. From left to right: 2019-10-30 21 UTC and 2019-10-31 12 UTC.

Figure 6

Synoptic situation during the CAO I case study. Satellite image, mean sea level pressure (solid lines) and thickness 500 – 1000 hPa layer (dashed lines). 2020-01-04 12 UTC.

Figure 7

Synoptic situation during the CAO II case study. Satellite image, mean sea level pressure (solid lines) and thickness of the 500 – 1000 hPa layer (dashed lines). From left to right: 2020-03-10 00 UTC, 2020-03-11 06 UTC and 2020-03-12 09 UTC.

Figure 8

Synoptic situation during the STR case study. Satellite image and mean sea level pressure. 2020-02-05 03 UTC.

Figure 9

Comparison of the experiments regarding mean sea level pressure.

Figure 10

Comparison of the experiments regarding 2 m temperature.

Figure 11

Comparison of the experiments regarding 2 m specific humidity.

Figure 12

Comparison of the experiments regarding 10 m wind speed.

Figure 13

Comparison of the experiments regarding 10 m wind speed based on verification with ASCAT wind data.

Figure 14

Spread and RMSE for mean sea level pressure.

Figure 15

Spread and RMSE for 10 m wind speed.

Figure 16

Spread and RMSE for 2 m temperature.

Figure 17

Spread and RMSE for 2 m specific humidity.

Figure 18

Mean SST perturbations for each of the perturbation methods averaged over all forecasts.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusa.27 | Journal eISSN: 3035-9554
Language: English
Page range: 271 - 289
Submitted on: Dec 20, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 9, 2023
Published on: Aug 14, 2023
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Rafael Grote, Andrew Thomas Singleton, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.