Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Tangent-Linear and Adjoint Models of the NEPTUNE Dynamical Core Cover

The Tangent-Linear and Adjoint Models of the NEPTUNE Dynamical Core

Open Access
|Nov 2022

References

  1. Amerault, C, Zou, X and Doyle, J. 2008. Tests of an adjoint mesoscale model with explicit moist physics on the cloud scale. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136: 21202132. DOI: 10.1175/2007MWR2259.1
  2. Ascher, UM, Ruuth, SJ and Spiteri, RJ. 1997. Implicit-explicit runge-kutta methods for time-dependent partial differential equations. Appl. Numer. Math., 25(2–3): 151167. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9274(97)00056-1
  3. Courtier, P, Derber, J, Errico, R, Louis, J-F and Vukicevic, T. 1993. Important literature on the use of adjoint, variational methods and the Kalman filter in meteorology. Tellus, 45A: 342357. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0870.1993.t01-4-00002.x
  4. Courtier, P, Thepaut, J-N and Hollingsworth, A. 1994. A strategy for operational implementation of 4D-Var, using an incremental approach. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 120: 13671387. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712051912
  5. Doyle, J, Reinecke, A, Viner, K, Flagg, D, Gabersek, S, King, S, Martini, M, Michalakes, J, Ryglicki, D and Giraldo, F. 2018. The Navy’s next-generation NEPTUNE modeling system. Paper 344413. AMS 25th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction. URL https://ams.confex.com/ams/29WAF25NWP/webprogram/Paper344413.html.
  6. Doyle, J, Reynolds, CA and Amerault, C. 2019. Adjoint sensitivity analysis of high-impact extratropical cyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 147(12): 45114532. DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-19-0055.1
  7. Errico, RM. 1997. What is an adjoint model? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78(11): 25772591. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<;2577:WIAAM>2.0.CO;2
  8. Firl, G, Carson, L, Bernardet, L, Heinzeller, D and Harrold, M. 2021. Common Community Physics Package single column model v5.0.0 user and technical guide. URL https://dtcenter.org/GMTB/v5.0.0/scm-ccpp-guide-v5.0.0.pdf.
  9. Gardner, DJ, Guerra, JE, Hamon, FP, Reynolds, DR, Ullrich, PA and Carol, S. 2018. Woodward. Implicit–explicit (IMEX) Runge-Kutta methods for nonhydrostatic atmospheric models. Geosci. Model Dev., 11: 14971515. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-11-1497-2018
  10. Giering, R and Kaminski, T. 1998. Recipes for adjoint code construction. ACM Trans. Math. Software, 24: 437474. DOI: 10.1145/293686.293695
  11. Giraldo, FX, Hesthaven, JS and Warburton, T. 2002. Nodal high-order discontinuous Galerkin methods for the spherical shallow water equations. J. Com. Phys., 181: 499525. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7139
  12. Giraldo, FX, Kelly, JF and Constantinescu, EM. 2013. Implicit-explicit formulations for a 3D nonhydrostatic unified model of the atmosphere (NUMA). SIAM J. Sci. Comp., 35(5): B1162B1194. DOI: 10.1137/120876034
  13. Giraldo, FX, Restelli, M and Lauter, M. 2010. Semi-implicit formulations of the Navier–Stokes equations: Application to nonhydrostatic atmospheric modeling. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 32(6): 33943425. DOI: 10.1137/090775889
  14. Giraldo, FX and Rosmond, TE. 2004. A scalable spectral element Eulerian atmospheric model (SEE-AM) for NWP: Dynamical core tests. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132(1): 133153. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<;0133:ASSEEA>2.0.CO;2
  15. Hogan, TF, Liu, M, Ridout, JA, Peng, MS, Whitcomb, TR, Ruston, BC, Reynolds, CA, Eckermann, SD, Moskaitis, JR, Baker, NL, McCormack, JP, Viner, KC, McLay, JG, Flatau, MK, Xu, L, Chen, C and Chang, SW. 2014. The Navy Global Environmental Model. Oceanography, 27(3): 116125. DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2014.73
  16. Holdaway, D, Kim, JG, Lin, S-J, Errico, R, Gelaro, R, Kent, J, Coy, L, Doyle, J and Goldstein, A. 2017. Development and applications of the FV3 GEOS-5 adjoint modeling system. Report number GSFC-E-DAA-TN42822.
  17. Jablonowski, C and Williamson, DL. 2006. A baroclinic instability test case for atmospheric model dynamical cores. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132: 29432975. DOI: 10.1256/qj.06.12
  18. Kelly, JF and Giraldo, FX. 2012. Continuous and discontinuous Galerkin methods for a scalable 3D nonhydrostatic atmospheric model: limited-area mode. J. Comp. Phys., 231: 79888008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.042
  19. Kopera, MA and Giraldo, FX. 2015. Mass conservation of the unified continuous and discontinuous element-based Galerkin methods on dynamically adaptive grids with application to atmospheric simulations. J. Com. Phys., 297: 90103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.05.010
  20. Langland, RH and Baker, N. 2004. Estimation of observation impact using the NRL atmospheric variational data assimilation adjoint system. Tellus, 56A: 189201. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0870.2004.00056.x
  21. Levin, JC, Haidvogel, DB, Chua, B, Bennett, AF and Iskandarani, M. 2006. Euler–Lagrange equations for the spectral element shallow water system. Ocean Mod., 12: 348377. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2005.06.002
  22. Luchini, P and Bottaro, A. 2014. Adjoint equations in stability analysis. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 46(1): 493517. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010313-141253
  23. Mahfouf, J-F. 1999. Influence of physical processes on the tangent-linear approximation. Tellus, 51A: 147166. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0870.1999.00001.x
  24. Michalakes, J, Govett, M, Benson, R, Black, T, Juang, H, Reinecke, A and Skamarock, B. 2015. NGGPS Level-1 benchmarks and software evaluation. Washington, DC: Technical report, NOAA.
  25. Morgan, MC. 2018. On the dynamics of adjustment in the f-plane shallow water adjoint system. J. Atmos. Sci., 75: 15711585. DOI: 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0100.1
  26. Putman, WM and Lin, S-J. 2007. Finite-volume transport on various cubed-sphere grids. J. Com. Phys., 227: 5578. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.022
  27. Saito, K, Fujita, T, Yamada, Y, Ishida, J, Kumagai, Y, Aranami, K, Ohmori, S, Nagasawa, R, Kumagai, S, Muroi, C, Kato, T, Eito, H and Yamazaki, Y. 2006. The operational JMA nonhydrostatic mesoscale model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134(4): 12661298. DOI: 10.1175/MWR3120.1
  28. Tian, X and Zou, X. 2020. Development of the tangent linear and adjoint models of the MPAS-Atmosphere dynamic core and applications in adjoint relative sensitivity studies. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 72(1): 117. DOI: 10.1080/16000870.2020.1814602
  29. Ullrich, PA, Jablonowski, C, Kent, J, Lauritzen, PH, Nair, R, Reed, KA, Zarzycki, CM, Hall, DM, Dazlich, D, Heikes, R, Konor, C, Randall, D, Dubos, T, Meurdesoif, Y, Chen, X, Harris, L, Ku¨hnlein, C, Lee, V, Qaddouri, A, Girard, C, Giorgetta, M, Reinert, D, Klemp, J, Park, S-H, Skamarock, W, Miura, H, Ohno, T, Yoshida, R, Walko, R, Reinecke, A and Viner, K. 2017. DCMIP2016: a review of non-hydrostatic dynamical core design and intercomparison of participating models. Geosci. Model Dev., 10: 44774509. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-4477-2017
  30. Vogl, CJ, Steyer, A, Reynolds, DR, Ullrich, PA and Woodward, C. 2019. Evaluation of implicit-explicit additive Runge-Kutta integrators for the HOMME-NH dynamical core. J. Adv. Mod. Earth Sys., 11: 42284244. DOI: 10.1029/2019MS001700
Language: English
Page range: 399 - 411
Submitted on: May 26, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 18, 2022
Published on: Nov 25, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Edward D. Zaron, Boon S. Chua, P. Alex Reinecke, John Michalakes, James D. Doyle, Liang Xu, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.