Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Merits of Ocean Prediction for the Prediction of 2010, 2016, and 2021 Summer Heavy Rainfall Events in Japan Cover

The Merits of Ocean Prediction for the Prediction of 2010, 2016, and 2021 Summer Heavy Rainfall Events in Japan

By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. Araki, K, Kato, T, Hirockawa, Y and Mashiko, W. 2021. Characteristics of atmospheric environments of quasi-stationary convective bands in Kyushu, Japan during the July 2020 heavy rainfall event. SOLA, 17: 815. DOI: 10.2151/sola.2021-002
  2. Baba, Y. 2015. Sensitivity of the atmospheric energy budget to two-moment representation of cloud microphysics in idealized simulations of convective radiative quasi-equilibrium. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141: 114127. DOI: 10.1002/qj.2342
  3. Baba, Y. 2019. Spectral cumulus parameterization based on cloud-resolving model. Climate Dyn., 52: 309334. DOI: 10.1007/s00382-018-4137-z
  4. Baba, Y. 2020a. Diurnal cycle of precipitation over the Maritime Continent simulated by a spectral cumulus parameterization. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 91: 101160. DOI: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2020.101160
  5. Baba, Y. 2020b. Roles of atmospheric variabilities in the formation of the Indian Ocean Dipole. Ocean Dyn., 70: 2139. DOI: 10.1007/s10236-019-01318-7
  6. Baba, Y. 2020c. Shallow convective closure in a spectral cumulus parameterization. Atmos. Res., 233: 104707. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104707
  7. Baba, Y. 2021. Influence of a spectral cumulus parameterization on simulating global tropical cyclone activity in an AGCM. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147: 11701188. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3965
  8. Baba, Y. 2022. Importance of ocean prediction for heavy rainfall prediction over Japan in July 2020. Atmos. Sci. Lett., 23: e1099. DOI: 10.1002/asl.1099
  9. Baba, Y and Ogata, T. 2022. Resolution dependence of tropical cyclones simulated by a spectral cumulus parameterization. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans, 97: 101283. DOI: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2022.101283
  10. Baba, Y, Takahashi, K, Sugimura, T and Goto, K. 2010. Dynamical core of an atmospheric general circulation model on a Yin-Yang grid. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138: 39884005. DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3375.1
  11. Craig, A, Valcke, S and Coquart, L. 2017. Development and performance of a new version of the OASIS coupler, OASIS3-MCT 3.0. Geosci. Model Dev., 10: 32973308. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-10-3297-2017
  12. Duc, L, Kawabata, T, Saito, K and Oizumi, T. 2021. Forecasts of the July 2020 Kyushu heavy rain using a 1000-member ensemble Kalman filter. SOLA, 17: 4147. DOI: 10.2151/sola.2021-007
  13. Fujibe, F, Yamazaki, N, Katsuyama, M and Kobayashi, K. 2005. The increasing trend of intense precipitation in Japan based on four-hourly data for a hundred years. SOLA, 1: 4144. DOI: 10.2151/sola.2005-012
  14. Fujibe, F, Yamazaki, N and Kobayashi, K. 2006. Long-term changes of heavy precipitation and dry weather in Japan (1901–2004). J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 84: 10331046. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.84.1033
  15. Gao, H, Yang, S, Kumar, A, Hu, Z-Z, Huang, B, et al. 2011. Variations of the East Asia Mei-yu and simulation and prediction by the NCEP climate forecast system. J. Climate, 24: 94108. DOI: 10.1175/2010JCLI3540.1
  16. Gimeno, L, Algarra, I, Eiras-Barca, J, Ramos, AM and Nieto, R. 2021. Atmospheric river, a term encompassing different meteorological patterns. WIREs Water, 8: e1558. DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1558
  17. Gimeno, L, Nieto, R, Vazquez, M and Lavers, DA. 2014. Atmospheric rivers: a minireview. Front. Earth Sci., 2: 16. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2014.00002
  18. Hersbach, H, Bell, B, Berrisford, P, Hirahara, S, Horányi, A, Muñoz-Sabater, J, et al. 2020. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146: 19992049.
  19. Hosoda, S, Ohira, T, Sato, K and Suga, T. 2010. Improved description of global mixed-layer depth using Argo profiling floats. J. Oceanogr., 66: 773787. DOI: 10.1007/s10872-010-0063-3
  20. Ishida, J, Aranami, K, Kawano, K, Matsubayashi, K, Kitamura, Y and Muroi, C. 2022. ASUCA: The JMA operational non-hydrostatic model. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 100: 825846. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2022-043
  21. Japan Meteorological Agency. 2019. Outline of the operational numerical weather prediction at the Japan Meteorological Agency. Appendix to WMO technical progress report on the global data-processing and forecasting system and numerical weather prediction, JMA. URL: https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/nwp/outline2019-nwp/index.htm.
  22. Japan Meteorological Agency. 2022. Weather events that caused disasters during 1989–2021 (in Japanese). URL: https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/data/bosai/report/index.html. Accessed in July 2021.
  23. Kamae, Y, Mei, W and Xie, S-P. 2017. Climatological relationship between warm season atmospheric rivers and heavy rainfall over East Asia. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 95: 411431. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2017-027
  24. Kato, T. 2020. Quasi-stationary band-shaped precipitation systems, named “Senjo-Kousuitai”, causing localized heavy rainfall in Japan. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98: 485509. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2020-029
  25. Kiehl, JT, Shields, CA, Hack, JJ and Collins, WD. 2006. The climate sensitivity of the community climate system model version 3 (CCSM3). J. Climate, 19: 25842596. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI3747.1
  26. Lavers, DA, Allan, RP, Wood, EF and Wade, AJ. 2012. The detection of atmospheric rivers in atmospheric reanalyses and their links to British winter floods and the large-scale climatic circulation. J. Geophys. Res., 117: D20106. DOI: 10.1029/2012JD018027
  27. Liu, X, Ma, X, Chag, P, Jia, Y, Fu, D, Xu, G, et al. 2021. Ocean fronts and eddies force atmospheric rivers and heavy precipitation in western north America. Nature Comm., 12: 1268. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21504-w
  28. Madec, G and NEMO team. 2016. NEMO ocean engine, version 3.6 stable. Note du Pôle de modélisation de l’Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace No 27, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace.
  29. Ministry of education, culture, sports, science and technology (MEXT) and Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). 2020. Climate change of Japan 2020 (in Japanese). Evaluation report of observation and prediction for atmosphere, land, and ocean, MEXT and JMA.
  30. Miyazawa, Y, Zhang, R, Guo, X, Tamura, H, Ambe, D, Lee, J-S, Okuno, A, Yoshinari, H, Setou, T and Komatsu, K. 2009. Water mass variability in the western north Pacific detected in a 15-year eddy resolving ocean reanalysis. J. Oceanogr., 65: 737756. DOI: 10.1007/s10872-009-0063-3
  31. Moisan, JR and Niiler, PP. 1998. The seasonal heat budget of the north Pacific: net heat flux and heat storage rates (1950–1990). J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28: 401421. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1998)028<;0401:TSHBOT>2.0.CO;2
  32. Molteni, F, Buizza, R, Palmer, TN and Petroliagis, T. 1996. The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122: 73119. DOI: 10.1002/qj.49712252905
  33. Mundhenk, BD, Barnes, EA and Maloney, ED. 2016. All-season climatology and variability of atmospheric river frequencies over the north Pacific. J. Climate, 29: 48854903. DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0655.1
  34. Ninomiya, K and Akiyama, T. 1992. Multi-scale features of Baiu, the summer monsoon over Japan and East Asia. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 70: 467495. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj1965.70.1B_467
  35. Ninomiya, K and Shibagaki, Y. 2007. Multi-scale features of the Meiyu-Baiu front and associated precipitation systems. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 103122. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.85B.103
  36. Nishii, K, Taguchi, B and Nakamura, H. 2020. An atmospheric general circulation model assessment of oceanic impacts on extreme climatic events over Japan in July 2018. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98(4): 801820. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2020-041
  37. Ogata, T and Baba, Y. 2021. Variability of tropical cyclone frequency over the western north Pacific in 2018–2020. Front. Clim., 3: 770785. DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2021.770785
  38. Ono, K, Kunii, M and Honda, Y. 2021. The regional model-based mesoscale ensemble prediction system, MEPS, at the Japan Meteorological Agency. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor.Soc., 147: 465484. DOI: 10.1002/qj.3928
  39. Reynolds, RW, Smith, TM, Liu, C, Chelton, DB, Casey, KS and Schiax, MG. 2007. Daily high-resolution-blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 20: 54735496. DOI: 10.1175/2007JCLI1824.1
  40. Takemi, T and Unuma, T. 2019. Diagnosing environmental properties of the July 2018 heavy rainfall event in Japan. SOLA, 15A: 6056. DOI: 10.2151/sola.15A-011
  41. Tanizaki, C, Tozuka, T, Doi, T and Yamagata, T. 2017. Relative importance of the processes contributing to the development of SST anomalies in the eastern pole of the Indian Ocean Dipole and its implication for predictability. Climate Dyn., 49: 12891304. DOI: 10.1007/s00382-016-3382-2
  42. Tsuji, H, Yokoyama, C and Takayabu, YN. 2020. Constracting features of the July 2018 heavy rainfall event and the 2017 northern Kyushu rainfall event in Japan. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 98(4): 859876. DOI: 10.2151/jmsj.2020-045
  43. Valcke, S. 2013. The OASIS3 coupler: A European climate modelling community software. Geosci. Model Dev., 6: 373388. DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-373-2013
  44. Wang, B, Ding, Q, Fu, X, Kang, I-S, Jin, K and Shukla, J. 2005. Fundamental challenge in simulation and prediction of summer monsoon rainfall. Geophys. Res. Lett., 32: L15711. DOI: 10.1029/2005GL022734
  45. Wang, B, Xiang, B and Lee, J-Y. 2013. Subtropical high predictability establishes a promising way for monsoon and tropical storm predictions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA), 110: 27182722. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1214626110
  46. Wilks, DS. 2006. Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 627. 2nd ed. Academic Press.
  47. Yatagai, A, Minami, K, Masuda, M and Sueto, N. 2019. Development of intensive APHRODITE hourly precipitation data for assessment of the moisture transport that caused heavy precipitation events. SOLA, 15A: 4348. DOI: 10.2151/sola.15A-008
  48. Zhao, M, Held, IH and Vecchi, GA. 2010. Retrospective forecasts of the hurricane season using a global atmospheric model assuming persistence of SST anomalies. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138: 38583868. DOI: 10.1175/2010MWR3366.1
  49. Zhu, Y and Newell, RE. 1998. A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric river. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126: 725735. DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<;0725:APAFMF>2.0.CO;2
  50. Zuo, H, Balmaseda, MA, Tietsche, S, Mogensen, K and Mayer, M. 2019. The ECMWF operational ensemble reanalysis-analysis system for ocean and sea ice: a description of the system and assessment. Ocean Sci., 15: 779808. DOI: 10.5194/os-15-779-2019
Language: English
Page range: 50 - 68
Submitted on: Sep 14, 2022
Accepted on: Jan 2, 2023
Published on: Jan 25, 2023
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Yuya Baba, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.