Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review Cover

Empirical Research on Decent Work: A Literature Review

Open Access
|Jun 2019

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Number of publications.

YearNumber of publications
20032
20061
20071
20082
20093
20122
20131
20143
20155
201611
20177
Table 2

Sampling and study method in the studies reviewed.

Studies (order by publication date)Main research topicCountries SampleDesign Data Collection/Sample Analysis Method
Ahmed, 2003Relationship between decent work and human developmentTransnational (38 countries)Cross-sectional: Correlational
Composite index of decent work deficit; Human
Development Index
Regression analysis
Bescond et al., 2003Indicators to measure decent workTransnational (40 countries)Cross-sectional: Descriptive
Data from national labour force surveys
Data analysis
Kantor, Rani and Unni, 2006Decent work deficit among male and femaleIndiaCross-sectional; Descriptive
Questionnaire: 814 households and individual workers (407 males and 407 females)
Descriptive analysis
Kelkar and Yunxian, 2007Gender-specific features of labour marketChina and IndiaCross-sectional; Descriptive
Available literature and policy discourse and reports produced by labour organisations and women’s organisations in China and India, such as the All China Women’s Federation (ACWF), China Women’s News, the Chinese Working Women’s Network (CWNN), Self-Employed Women’s Association Literature and (SEWA), with attention to the clothing industry
Documental analysis
Lawrence, Gil, Fluckiger, Lambert and Werna, 2008Promoting decent workTransnational (4 countries)Case study; Descriptive
Documentary sources: Local authority staff, representatives of employers’ associations and workers’ unions
Documental analysis
Gil, Lawrence, Fluckiger, Lambert and Werna, 2008Decent work, local employmentBrazilCase study; Mixed-methods; Descriptive
Data about employment conditions from official statistics at both the national and local levels; Structured interviews: Local authority staff, representatives of employers’ associations and workers’ unions
Data analysis; Content analysis
Saha, 2009Decent work, working conditionsIndia (Mumbai)Cross-sectional; Mixed-methods; Exploratory; Descriptive
Semi-structured questionnaire; Street vendors: 200 personal interviews with: 5 group sessions; 10–15 vendors per group session; Key respondents: 5 in-depth interviews
Descriptive analysis
Tangian, 2009Indexing working conditionsTransnational (31 countries)Cross-sectional; Descriptive
Data from the Fourth European Working Conditions Survey: 23788 persons selected
HBS (Hans Böckler Foundation) method
Thore and Tarverdyan, 2009Quantify ILO objectives and identify policies conducive to DWTransnational (61 countries)Cross-sectional; Descriptive
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files; International Monetary Fund, International Financial Statistics and Balance of Payments databases, among others
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - instrument of performance management
Adhikari, Hirasava, Takakubo and Pandey, 2012Decent work and quality of work lifeNepalCross-sectional; Descriptive
Literature survey of national policy documents, National Planning Commission, labour legislations, International Labour Organization (ILO) and other relevant literature
Documental analysis
Pedraza et al., 2012Immigrants’ employment situationSpainCross-sectional; Correlational
Data from Muestra Continua de Vidas Laborales: 650,000 workers
Logistic regressions
Bletsas and Charlesworth, 2013Gender equality and decent workAustraliaCross-sectional; Descriptive
ParlInfo database: 87 parliamentary documents
Qualitative discourse analysis
De Beer, Rogerson and Rogerson, 2014Working conditionsSouth AfricaCross-sectional; Descriptive
Literature Survey; Interviews: 60 tourist guides; 5 leading South African tour companies; 3 smaller tour enterprises
Thematic analysis; Content analysis
Edralin, 2014Precarious work, decent workPhilippinesCross-sectional; Descriptive
Literature survey; Structured questionnaire: 93 workers from 12 unionized hotels; 8 interviews; government publications
Content analysis; Descriptive Analysis
Di Ruggiero et al., 2014Decent work agendaGlobal institutionsCross-sectional; Descriptive
Semi-structured interviews: 16 representatives from three global institutions
Content analysis
Charlesworth and Macdonald, 2015Decent work agenda and gender equalityAustralia, Canada, the Netherlands, and the UKCross-sectional; Descriptive; Mixed-methods
In-depth interviews: 73 representatives from government, employment and human rights organisations, employer and business bodies, unions and civil society organisations; documents produced by stakeholder organisations
Content analysis; Documental analysis
Di Ruggiero et al., 2015Conceptualizations of decent work, health, equityGlobal institutionsCross-sectional; Descriptive
Policy discourses: 10 policy texts by ILO, WHO, WB
Critical discourse analysis techniques (CDA)
Mehta, 2015Women’s work and working conditionsIndiaCross-sectional; Descriptive
Semi-structured questionnaire: 220 female ICT employees
Statistical analysis (ratios, averages and percentages)
Sehnbruch et al., 2015Human development and decent workGlobal InstitutionsCross-sectional; Descriptive; Mixed-methods
Qualitative interviews: 50 interviews with United Nations officials (25 from ILO; 25 from United Nations Development Programme, other United Nations institutions, policy makers, EU officials and academic experts)
Content analysis
Webster et al., 2015Diagnostic tool for the realization of decent workSouth AfricaCross-sectional; Descriptive; Mixed-methods
Interviews and questionnaire: 3 industries – private security, agriculture, and hospitality
Content analysis; Statistical analysis
Di Fabio and Bucci, 2016Green positive guidance and green positive life counsellingItalyCross-sectional; Descriptive-correlational
Questionnaires: 144 high school students
Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s r correlations, and hierarchical regressions
Di Fabio and Kenny, 2016Decent life and positive self and relational managementItalyCross-sectional; Descriptive-correlational
Questionnaire: 184 university students
Descriptive statistics; Pearson’s r correlations
Edralin, 2016Good work through decent work practicesPhilippinesCross-sectional; Descriptive-exploratory
Survey interview, focused group discussion (FGD), and participant observation: 140 workers from 16 unionized firms
Content analysis
Ferraro et al., 2016dDevelopment of the Decent Work QuestionnaireBrazil and PortugalCross-sectional; Descriptive; Mixed-Methods
25 semi-structured interviews: experts; Decent Work Questionnaire: Knowledge workers: 636 PT and 1039 Brazil
Content analysis; Exploratory factor analysis
Islam, Cojocaru, Rahman, Siti-Hajar and Arnakim, 2016Decent work practiceSingapore and ItalyCross-sectional; Descriptive
National and international reports and documents including reports published by ILO, IOM, Human Rights Watch, and Human rights organizations
Documental analysis
Sandhu, 2016National culture and decent workUAECross-sectional; Descriptive
Participant observation method, semi-structured interviews and narrative method: migrant construction labourers: 18 Indian/12 Pakistani/11 Bangladeshi groups or individuals
Cross-cultural analysis
Lavagnini and Mennella, 2016Decent work and human development, capability approachItalyCross-sectional; Case study; Descriptive
Data of ISTAT, INPS, EUROSTAT, OECD, ISFOL
Empirical analysis
Pouyaud, 2016Psychosocial approach to decent workFranceCross-sectional; Case study
Interview: 1 social worker
Thematic analysis
Ribeiro et al., 2016Decent work and social constructionismBrazil and PortugalCross-sectional; Descriptive
Thematic autobiographical narrative: 20 urban workers
Content analysis
Simonova et al., 2016Decent work principlesRussiaLongitudinal; Descriptive
Data of Federal State Statistics Service and data from Social and Labor Rights Center
Data Analysis
Wicaksono and Priyadi, 2016Decent work in global production networkIndonesiaCross-sectional; Descriptive
Data of Sakernas (National Labour Survey), BPS
Data analysis
Cruz, Hardy and Sanders, 2017Decent work, self-employment, working conditionsUKCross-sectional; Descriptive; Mixed-methods
Interviewer-administered survey: 197 dancers; Interviews: N = 35 dancers, N = 20 people who worked in the industry and owners, N = 20, N = 15 people involved in regulation with roles.
Statistical analysis; Content analysis
Douglass et al., 2017Discrimination, decent workEUACross-sectional; Descriptive-correlational
Decent work scale: 218 employed sexual minority adults
Structural equation modelling
Duffy et al., 2017Decent Work Questionnaire, psychology of workingEUACross-sectional; Descriptive-correlational
Decent work scale: 864 employed adults
Exploratory factor analysis
Ferraro et al., 2017Work motivation and psychological capitalBrazil and PortugalCross-sectional; Descriptive-correlational
Decent work questionnaire: 3004 knowledge workers
Structural Equation Modelling analyses
Jawando and Adenugba, 2017Gender differences and decent workNigeria (Lagos)Cross-sectional; Mixed-methods; Descriptive
Questionnaire: 550 workers from the food and beverage industry; Interviews: 16 interviews (5 female workers, 3 male workers, 4 management staff and 4 Union executives)
Descriptive analysis; Content analysis
Singh, 2017Decent work agendaIndiaCross-sectional; Descriptive
Data of ASI
Data analysis
Yao, Parker, Arrowsmith and Carr, 2017Decent work and life and quality of working lifeNew ZealandCross-sectional; Descriptive
Narratives: 606 employees
Content analysis
Table 4

Indicators used by countries.

StudiesCountriesIndicators
Bescond et al., 200340 countriesLow hourly pay; excessive hours of work; youth unemployment; male-female gap in labour force participation; old age without pension; unemployment; child labour
Kantor et al., 2006IndiaLabour market security; employment security; work security; skill reproduction security; income security; representation security; job security
Gil et al., 2008BrazilChild labour; inequality in the workplace; employment opportunities; paid employment; conditions of work; social security insurance; old-age pensions; union density coverage; collective bargaining coverage; forced labour; inequality in the workplace
Lawrence et al., 2008Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Brazil, Ecuador
Tangian, 200931 countriesQualifications and development possibilities; creativity; career opportunities; possibilities for influence; communications and transparency; quality of management/leadership; industrial culture; collegiality; meaningfulness of work; time arrangements; work intensity/stress; physical strain; emotional strain; job stability and job security; income
Thore and Tarverdyan, 200961 countriesExports of goods and services; foreign direct investment; subsidies and other transfers; taxes on international trade; unemployment; non-poverty headcount; women in paid employment
Adhikari et al., 2012NepalEmployment opportunities; income; job security; poverty
Lavagnini and Mennella, 2016ItalyWorking hours deficit; physical safety deficit; legality of jobs deficit; unemployment rate pressure
Singh, 2017IndiaOutput; employment; productivity; profits and investment; wages and distribution of income
Yao et al., 2017New ZealandWage effectiveness
Table 5

Indicators used by sector of activity.

StudiesSector of ActivityIndicators
Saha, 2009Street vendorsLevel of income; accessibility of finance; security of work; safety in the workplace; working hours
De Beer et al., 2014Tourist guidesJob security; income; benefits
Edralin, 2014Unionized hotel workersPrecarious work
Mehta, 2015Female ICT sector employeesEmployment opportunity; working conditions; social security; social dialogue
Edralin, 2016Unionized firm workersProductive work; opportunities for work; equity in work; security at work; representation at work
Islam et al., 2016Migrant domestic workersWorking hours; annual leave; maternity protection; minimum wage
Sandhu, 2016Migrant construction labourersMigration debt; extended family; overwork; no religious rights; homesickness; no entertainment; abuse at work; no proper food; absenteeism; injury at work; no social security; family issues at home
Wicaksono and Priyadi, 2016Automotive industryEmployment opportunity; productive work; adequate earnings
Cruz et al., 2017StrippersSelf-employment
Jawando, 2017Workers in the food and beverage industryGender differences
Table 6

Gaps in the existing DW empirical research.

GapsSuggestionsAssumptions
Lack of integration of research on different subjects that are components of DWIntegrative research is suggested to bring together research on different DW components.Joining together previous research on DW components allows a deeper understanding of labour-related phenomena.
Assumption that if a country reports DW deficit that country has a problemTake into account the interdependence brought by globalization and always approach DW deficits as world problems.DW deficit, whenever it occurs, is a world DW deficit.
The extant psychological measures of DW were applied in a small number of countries and in a narrow span of worker diversity.Validate these instruments in diverse samples (from several countries and including worker diversity).The psychological measurement of DW is useful for knowledge development and practical improvements in the labour field.
Absence of the effects of different determinants on DWExamine the determinants in relation to DW namely in terms of psychological variables more closely.The study of the nomological network of the DW concept is relevant for knowledge development and practical improvements in the labour field (DW as criterion variable).
Absence of research on different impacts of DWDevelop studies on the DW impact.The study of the nomological network of the DW concept is relevant for knowledge development and practical improvements in the labour field (DW as predictor variable).
Countries’ diversity is under-researched so farExpand empirical research to different countries worldwide.DW has some cultural diversity in the way it is expressed, which is relevant to study both for knowledge development and practical improvements.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.53 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Submitted on: Apr 9, 2018
Accepted on: Apr 25, 2019
Published on: Jun 14, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2019 Susana Pereira, Nuno Dos Santos, Leonor Pais, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.