Table 1
Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: Job insecurity, organizational resilience, communication, and rumors.
| χ2 | df | p-VALUE | χ2/df | NFI | IFI | CFI | RMR | RMSEA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCFA: Job insecurity | 12.15 | 4 | 0.01 | 3.03 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.012 | 0.040 |
| MCFA: Organizational resilience | 384.21 | 68 | 0.00 | 5.65 | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.045 | 0.060 |
| MCFA: Communication | 105.55 | 4 | 0.00 | 26.38 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.026 | 0.139 |
| MCFA: Rumors | 183.32 | 18 | 0.00 | 10.18 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.069 | 0.084 |
Table 2
Invariance measurement.
| Δχ2 | Δdf | p-VALUE | ΔCFI | ΔMc NCI | ΔRMSEA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job insecurity: Metric invariance | 30.13 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| Job insecurity: Scalar invariance | 115.78 | 10 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| Job insecurity: Partial scalar invariance | 69.42 | 9 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Organizational resilience: Metric variance | 73.66 | 9 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| Organizational resilience: Scalar variance | 190.68 | 9 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Organizational resilience: Partial scalar variance | 32.18 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Communication: Metric invariance | 6.12 | 3 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Communication: Scalar invariance | 20.49 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| Rumors: Metric invariance | 49.30 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| Rumors: Scalar invariance | 72.48 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
Table 3
Descriptive statistics (means and standard deviations) and correlations.
| MEAN | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Country (dummy) | – | – | – | |||||||
| 2. Organizational size | 1110.6 | 334.42 | –0.07 | – | ||||||
| 3. Job Insecurity Climate | 2.03 | 0.65 | 0.41** | 0.10 | – | |||||
| 4. Organization type (dummy) | – | – | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.23** | – | ||||
| 5. % temporary workers | 19.66 | 97.82 | 0.12 | 0.22* | 0.27** | 0.09 | – | |||
| 6. Organizational resilience | 3.51 | 0.35 | –0.18* | 0.00 | –0.32** | 0.04 | –0.24** | – | ||
| 7. Communication | 3.72 | 0.59 | –0.05 | –0.12 | –0.52** | –0.08 | –0.32** | 0.55** | – | |
| 8. Rumours | 2.42 | 0.85 | 0.31** | 0.06 | 0.64** | –0.21* | 0.26** | –0.36** | –0.54** | – |
[i] Note. Note: n = 141 organizations. * p < .05; ** p < .01. Organization type and Country are dummy variables (0 = public, 1 = private; 0 = Austria, 1 = Spain).
Table 4
Summary of hierarchical regression analyses: Predictors of job insecurity climate.
| ESTIMATE | SE | 95% CI | P | R2 | ΔR2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LL | UL | ||||||
| Step 1 | 0.079 | 0.079 | |||||
| Organizational size | 0.068 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.462 | ||
| Retail sector | 0.161 | 0.375 | –0.527 | 0.960 | 0.565 | ||
| Education sector | 0.069 | 0.378 | –0.651 | 0.846 | 0.797 | ||
| Construction sector | 0.353 | 0.383 | –0.204 | 1.314 | 0.150 | ||
| Health sector | 0.060 | 0.389 | –0.668 | 0.873 | 0.792 | ||
| Step 2 | 0.120 | 0.041 | |||||
| Organization type | 0.275* | 0.183 | 0.052 | 0.776 | 0.025 | ||
| Step 3 | 0.189 | 0.069 | |||||
| % Temporary workers in the organization | 0.273** | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.003 | ||
| Step 4 | 0.252 | 0.063 | |||||
| Organizational resilience | –0.267** | 0.163 | –0.817 | –0.0169 | 0.003 | ||
| Step 5 | 0.345 | 0.093 | |||||
| Communication | –.385** | 0.106 | –0.622 | –0.203 | 0.001 | ||
| Step 6 | 0.617 | 0.271 | |||||
| Rumours | 0.659*** | 0.056 | 0.377 | 0.601 | 0.001 | ||
| Step 7 | 0.644 | 0.027 | |||||
| Country | 0.194** | 0.095 | 0.079 | 0.455 | 0.006 | ||
[i] Note. n = 141 organizations. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001. Estimate refers to unstandardized coefficients. Organization type, Labour sector and Country are dummy variables (0 = public, 1 = private; 0 = Austria, 1 = Spain).