Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Leadership and Employee Well-Being and Work Performance when Working from Home: A Systematic Literature Review Cover

Leadership and Employee Well-Being and Work Performance when Working from Home: A Systematic Literature Review

Open Access
|Sep 2023

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Examples of search terms.

LEADERSHIPANDWELL-BEINGANDREMOTE WORKORCOVID
Leader*Well-beingTeleworkCovid-19
Manager*HealthWork* from homeCorona virus
SupervisorSatisfactionDigital work2019-nCoV
Figure 1

Flowchart of the study selection process.

Table 2

Identified leadership behaviours in the qualitative studies, illustrative quates and examples of studies.

CATEGORYDESCRIPTIONILLUSTRATIVE QUOTESEXAMPLES OF STUDIES
Communicate and informRapid and frequent communication, preferrably face-to-face.Communication was described by almost all leaders as a key health-oriented leadership behavior. A rich and asynchronous communication media appropriate to the purpose of communication was named as a basic principle. (Efimov et al., 2020, p. 9)Adams et al., 2021; AlMazrouei, 2021; AlMazrouei & Zacca, 2021; Bjärntoft et al., 2021; Bosua et al., 2013; Cooper & Kurland, 2002; Delfino & van der Kolk, 2021; Efimov et al., 2020; Felstead et al., 2003; Kurland & Cooper, 2002; Longmuir, 2021; Montreuil & Lippel, 2003; Ruiller et al., 2019; Schwarzmüller et al., 2018; Shipman et al., 2021; Thornton, 2021; Weideman & Hofmeyr, 2020
Provide and use technological tools, such as video, to ease communication.The finding of this study indicates that employees have come up with new ways to do their work, involving making substantially more video calls and sending many more emails. This was found to be the case for both managers and employees. Most respondents spoke of making use of novel approaches, mainly involving technology, to complete their tasks. (AlMazrouei & Zacca, 2021, p. 12)
Difficult to achieve good communication, especially digitally.When you’re face-to-face, you can immediately see what happens in the meeting. The atmosphere […] Someone who says two or three words on her/his business. In teleworking, you miss that: a colleague who isn’t right for example (Ruiller et al., 2019, p. 17)
Control and set boundariesManagerial need to control and sometimes survail employees working from home.An interviewed manager of a non-Big-4 PSF was very clear about his reasons to monitor his team. Since they’re not controlled [at home], I do not take it for granted that they indeed deliver their work within the agreed deadlines. (Delfino & van der Kolk, 2021, p. 1381)AlMazrouei & Zacca, 2021; Bjärntoft et al., 2021; Bosua et al., 2013; Chafi et al., 2022; Cooper & Kurland, 2002; Delfino & van der Kolk, 2021; Efimov et al., 2020; Felstead et al., 2003; Hascher et al., 2021; Konradt et al., 2000; Kurland & Cooper, 2002; Longmuir, 2021; Montreuil & Lippel, 2003; Ruiller et al., 2019; Schwarzmüller et al., 2018; Shipman et al., 2021; Yarberry & Sims, 2021
Employee need of receiving feedback on work performance.My manager should not just be calling me when there are problems. I want to hear from my boss when I am doing a good job too. (Shipman et al., 2021, p. 15)
Employee need of clear and common guidelines and help to set boudaries.Leaders have a crucial role in curtailing followers’ stress, such as by making explicit arrangements regarding work during non-office time: ‘Leaders need to ensure that the flexibility of work time and space does not lead to a perceived or actual overload of employees. (Schwarzmüller et al., 2018, p. 123)
Allow autonomyTrust the employees to do their job and allow responsibility. Do not require constant visibility.Trust was repeatedly emphasized by managers as a necessary — indeed, unavoidable — element in the supervision of home-located workers. […] In this context, trust referred to a relationship of reciprocal moral obligations in which rewards and productivity were exchanged without investigation. (Felstead et al., 2003, p. 250)Adams et al., 2021; AlMazrouei & Zacca, 2021; Bosua et al., 2013; Chafi et al., 2022; Charalampous et al., 2021; Delfino & van der Kolk, 2021; Efimov et al., 2020; Felstead et al., 2003; Montreuil & Lippel, 2003; Ruiller et al., 2019; Schwarzmüller et al., 2018; Senthanar et al., 2021; Shipman et al., 2021; Thornton, 2021; Tietze & Nadin, 2011; Varshney, 2021; Weideman & Hofmeyr, 2020
Leading by involving, allow autonomy and facilitate selfleadership.According to the participants with managerial roles, the widespread implementation of remote work had led to increased autonomy for employees but posed new demands in terms of supporting employees’ adoption of self-leadership strategies. (Chafi et al., 2022, p. 10)
Support and show empathySupport and be available to employees not feeling well.Organizational management should understand that employees are likely feeling overwhelmed and anxious about circumstances related to the virus. I need the boss to be available to staff to talk about fears, to answer questions, and to reassure them about work and other issues that might come up. (Shipman et al., 2021, p. 18)Adams et al., 2021; AlMazrouei & Zacca, 2021; Chafi et al., 2022; Collins et al., 2016; Efimov et al., 2020; Felstead et al., 2003; Hascher et al., 2021; Kurland & Cooper, 2002; Lee, 2021; Longmuir, 2021; Schwarzmüller et al., 2018; Shipman et al., 2021; Varshney, 2021; Yarberry & Sims, 2021
Show understanding and empathy to the unique situation of the home worker.Our findings suggest that supervision of teleworkers can require a greater emotional involvement than with office- based staff as supervisors are drawn into the home domain. (Collins et al., 2016, s. 170)
Valueing and sactioningPrioritize and facilitate well-being and health.The prioritisation of wellbeing over learning over the time New Zealand schools were in lockdown was a feature of all the interviews with the principals, who demonstrated empathy for both students and staff. (Thornton, 2021, p. 399)Bjärntoft et al., 2021; Collins et al., 2016; Efimov et al., 2020; Felstead et al., 2003; Kurland & Cooper, 2002; Montreuil & Lippel, 2003; Schwarzmüller et al., 2018; Shipman et al., 2021; Thornton, 2021; Weideman & Hofmeyr, 2020
Show approval of working from home.My managers are very understanding, if there are things that I need to do or if all of a sudden I really did have to leave they’re fully understanding and will try to manage and work with me not against me. (Senthanar et al., 2021, p. 300)
Lead by example, managers valueing their own health shows the issue is important.Importantly, leaders should also role-model these arrangements (e.g. by not sending emails on weekends). (Schwarzmüller et al., 2018, p. 123)
Balancing individual and collective needsIndividuals have different needs when working from home.An evident theme was how organisations have recognised that employees differ in their approach to work and that one method of management cannot accommodate all individuals. (Weideman & Hofmeyr, 2020, p. 7)Bjärntoft et al., 2021; Chafi et al., 2022; Collins et al., 2016; Cooper & Kurland, 2002; Efimov et al., 2020; Felstead et al., 2003; Kurland & Cooper, 2002; Ruiller et al., 2019; Schwarzmüller et al., 2018; Shipman et al., 2021; Weideman & Hofmeyr, 2020
Managing employees working from home and on-site to reduce “us and them” thinking and conflicts.They telephone him up and say ‘Hope I didn’t catch you up the ladder’, you know, ‘mowing the lawn’, or whatever else….That’s all good humoured but it’s…not too great a step between that and…genuine animosity, is it?…It doesn’t take much for some people to feel that they’re unfairly disadvantaged…. And it matters an awful lot because all of a sudden you’ve alienated these people from the business. (Felstead et al., 2003, p. 254)
Table 3

Identified leadership behaviours in quantitative studies and their relation to well-being and work performance.

CATEGORYLEADERSHIPWELL-BEINGWORK PERFORMANCE
ASSOCIATIONNO ASSOCIATIONASSOCIATIONNO ASSOCIATION
Communicate and informCommunicative leadershipKelley & Kelloway, 2012; Madlock, 2013Shockley et al., 2021Shockley et al., 2021
E-leadershipChaudhary et al., 2022; Ibrahim, 2014; Ibrahim & Othman, 2019; Staples et al., 1998Ibrahim & Othman, 2019; Staples et al., 1998
Control and set boundariesTask-oriented leadershipBartsch et al., 2020
Destructive leadershipDolce et al., 2020; Spagnoli et al., 2020
Allow autonomyTrustful leadershipBaker et al., 2006Chu et al., 2022Baker et al., 2006Chu et al., 2022
Participative leadershipBhumika, 2020
Support and show empathySupportive leadershipAmano et al., 2021; Bartsch et al., 2020; Gamal Aboelmaged & Mohamed el Subbaugh, 2012; Guidetti et al., 2022; Karácsony, 2021; Karani et al., 2022; Košir et al., 2022; Kumar et al., 2022; Lamprinou et al., 2021; Nguyen & Tran, 2021; Platts et al., 2022Johnson et al., 2021Gamal Aboelmaged & Mohamed el Subbaugh, 2012
Valuing and sanctioningHealth-promoting leadershipBregenzer & Jimenez, 2021; Nielsen et al., 2019
Balancing individual and collective needsIdentity leadership (norms)Krug et al., 2021
Identity leadership (arenas)Krug et al., 2021
Comprehensive leadership stylesLMXGolden, 2006; Golden & Veiga, 2008; Kuruzovich et al., 2021Golden & Veiga, 2008; Kuruzovich et al., 2021
Servant leadershipLamprinou et al., 2021
FRLMAzizah et al., 2020; Gerards et al., 2018; Kelley & Kelloway, 2012; Whitford & Moss, 2009Azizah et al., 2020Whitford & Moss, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.199 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Language: English
Page range: 9 - 9
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2022
Accepted on: Jun 19, 2023
Published on: Sep 11, 2023
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Daniel Lundqvist, Andreas Wallo, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.