Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Congruence Rules! Increased Self-efficacy after Occupational Health Interventions—if Leaders and Teams Agree on the Participative Safety Climate Cover

Congruence Rules! Increased Self-efficacy after Occupational Health Interventions—if Leaders and Teams Agree on the Participative Safety Climate

Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Volume 7 (2022): Issue 1
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2022
Figures & tables

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Subscale intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and within group agreement.

SUBSCALENUMBER OF ITEMSICCMEAN RWG (J)
Social self-efficacy, time 15.47**.97
Social self-efficacy, time 25.13**.97
Emotional self-efficacy, time 18.35**.98
Emotional self-efficacy, time 28.08*.98
Cognitive self-efficacy, time 16.13**.92
Cognitive self-efficacy, time 26.02.89
Participatory safety, time 14.28**.85

[i] Note: K = 28 leaders.

* p < .05.

Figure 1

Leader–team perceptual distance pre-intervention (Time 1) on participatory safety climate and teams’ ratings of social self-efficacy post-intervention (Time 2).

Figure 2

Leader–team perceptual distance pre-intervention (Time 1) on participatory safety climate and teams’ ratings of emotional self-efficacy post-intervention (Time 2).

Figure 3

Leader–team perceptual distance pre-intervention (Time 1) on participatory safety climate and teams’ ratings of cognitive self-efficacy post-intervention (Time 2).

Table 2

Descriptive statistics and correlations among all study variables.

MSD1.2.3.4.5.6.7.
1.Participatory safety T1, team3.650.48
2.Participatory safety T1, leader3.690.62.41*
3.SocialSE T1, team2.650.66.42*.30
4.SocialSE T2, team2.970.28.30.25.55
5.EmotionalSE T1, team2.470.51.33.19.96**.45
6.EmotionalSE T2 team2.760.23.26.13.14.71**.07
7.CognitiveSE T1, team5.400.41.52**-.05.29.32.29.12
8.CognitiveSE T2, team5.470.28.40*.05.16.58**.14.68**.50**

[i] Note: SE = self-efficacy.

* p < .05, ** p < .01.

Table 3

Hierarchical Regression Analyses for teams’ ratings on subscales of self-efficacy (SE) at T2.

SOCIAL SE T2EMOTIONAL SE T2COGNITIVE SE T2
STEP 1STEP 2STEP 1STEP 2STEP 1STEP 2
Self-efficacy T1.55**.51*.07–.03.50 **.39
Leader-rated participatory-safety T1.05.27.21
Team rated participatory-safety T1.08.02-.02
F-value11.28**3.63*.11.598.73**3.10*
R2.30.31.004.07.25.28
DR2.01.06.03

[i] Note: T1 = Time 1, T2 = Time 2.

Number of Teams = 28.

Standardized Coefficients are presented.

* p < .05, ** p < .01.

Table 4

Polynomial Regression Analyses and Surface Values for Teams ratings of Self-efficacy.

SUBSCALES SELF EFFICACY AT T2
PARTICIPATORY SAFETY TIME 1SSEESECSE
Constant2.84**2.69**5.07**
Self-efficacy T1.32*.18.26
Leader-rated (b2)–.14–.48*–.27
Team-rated (b1)–.05.27.43
Leader-rated squared (b5)–.23*.02–.09
Leader-rated * team-rated(b4).57*–.60*.44*
Team-rated squared (b3)–.15–.35*–.36
R2.53**.32*.26*
Surface tests
p10.12.52.60
p111.15.56.55
a1 = (b1 + b2)–.19–.21.16
a2 = (b3 + b4 + b5).19.27–.02
a3 = (b1 – b2)–.09–.74–.70
a4 = (b3 – b4 + b5)–.95*–.93*–.89*

[i] Note: sSE = social self-efficacy, eSE = emotional self-efficacy, cSe = cognitive self-efficacy.

Number of Teams = 28.

Unstandardized Coefficients are presented.

* p < .05, ** p < .01.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.153 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 8 - 8
Submitted on: Mar 5, 2021
Accepted on: May 1, 2022
Published on: Jun 8, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Participative safety climate,
self-efficacy,
participatory OHS intervention,
contextual factors

© 2022 Carina Loeb, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, Henna Hasson, Susanne Tafvelin, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 7 (2022): Issue 1
Previous article
Next article