Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Causality Orientations in the Work Setting: Scale Development and Validation Cover

Causality Orientations in the Work Setting: Scale Development and Validation

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Antonakis, J., Bendahan, S., Jacquart, P., & Lalive, R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 10861120. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
  2. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic Need Satisfaction: A Motivational Basis of Performance and Well-Being in Two Work Settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 20452068. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
  3. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238246. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley. DOI: 10.1002/9781118619179
  5. Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., Van der Kaap-Deeder, J., … Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216236. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1
  6. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464504. DOI: 10.1080/10705510701301834
  7. Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233255. DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  8. Conway, J., & Lance, C. (2010). What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325334. DOI: 10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
  9. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297334. DOI: 10.1007/BF02310555
  10. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: State of the Science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 1943. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientations Scale – Self-Determination in Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109134. DOI: 10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  13. DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. (2012). A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 997. DOI: 10.1037/a0028244
  14. Dunn, J. G., Bouffard, M., & Rogers, W. T. (1999). Assessing item content-relevance in sport psychology scale-construction research: Issues and recommendations. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 3(1), 1536. DOI: 10.1207/s15327841mpee0301_2
  15. French, B. F., & Finch, W. H. (2006). Confirmatory factor analytic procedures for the determination of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(3), 378402. DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1303_3
  16. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331362. DOI: 10.1002/job.322
  17. Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A., … Westbye, C. (2015). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation Evidence in Seven Languages and Nine Countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178196. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
  18. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 155. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118
  19. Klein, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.
  20. Lam, C. F., & Gurland, S. T. (2008). Self-determined work motivation predicts job outcomes, but what predicts self-determined work motivation? Journal of Research in Personality, 42(4), 11091115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.002
  21. Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
  22. Liu, D., Chen, X.-P., & Yao, X. (2011). From autonomy to creativity: A multilevel investigation of the mediating role of harmonious passion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 294. DOI: 10.1037/a0021294
  23. Liu, D., & Fu, P.-P. (2011). Motivating proteges’ personal learning in teams: A multilevel investigation of autonomy support and autonomy orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1195. DOI: 10.1037/a0024716
  24. Liu, D., Zhang, S., Wang, L., & Lee, T. W. (2011). The effects of autonomy and empowerment on employee turnover: Test of a multilevel model in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1305. DOI: 10.1037/a0024518
  25. Luchak, A. A., & Gellatly, I. R. (2007). A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Relations Between Organizational Commitment and Work Outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 786793. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.3.786
  26. Malinowska, D., & Tokarz, A. (2020). The moderating role of Self Determination Theory’s general causality orientations in the relationship between the job resources and work engagement of outsourcing sector employees. Personality and Individual Differences, 153, 109638. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2019.109638
  27. Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach burnout inventory manual. Palo Alto, California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  28. Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
  29. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 6189. DOI: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  30. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus User’s Guide, 7. Los Angeles, California: Muthén & Muthén.
  31. O’Driscoll, M. P., & Beehr, T. A. (1994). Supervisor behaviors, role stressors and uncertainty as predictors of personal outcomes for subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(2), 141155. DOI: 10.1002/job.4030150204
  32. Olafsen, A. H., & Deci, E. L. (in press). Self-determination theory and its relation to organizations In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.
  33. Olafsen, A. H., & Halvari, H. (in progress). The Basic Psychological Need Satisfaction and Need Frustration at Work Scale: A Validation in Norwegian. Unpublished manuscript. USN School of Buisness. University of South-Eastern Norway.
  34. Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 129142. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00809.x
  35. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  36. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539569. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  37. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 7190. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  38. Reeve, J., Jang, H.-R., & Jang, H. (2018). Personality-based antecedents of teachers’ autonomy-supportive and controlling motivating styles. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 1222. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.001
  39. Rose, E. A., Markland, D., & Parfitt, G. (2001). The development and initial validation of the Exercise Causality Orientations Scale. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(6), 445462. DOI: 10.1080/026404101300149393
  40. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Autonomy and basic psychological needs in human motivation, social development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
  41. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75(2), 243248. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y
  42. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire:A Cross-National Study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701716. DOI: 10.1177/0013164405282471
  43. Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173180. DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
  44. Stenius, M., Haukkala, A., Hankonen, N., & Ravaja, N. (2017). What motivates experts to share? A prospective test of the model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 56, 871885. DOI: 10.1002/hrm.21804
  45. Tay, C., Ang, S., & Van Dyne, L. (2006). Personality, biographical characteristics, and job interview success: A longitudinal study of the mediating effects of interviewing self-efficacy and the moderating effects of internal locus of causality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 446454. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.446
  46. Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Deci and Ryan’s Self-Determination Theory: A View from the Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 312318.
  47. Vansteenkiste, M., Niemiec, C. P., & Soenens, B. (2010). The development of the five mini-theories of self-determination theory: An historical overview, emerging trends, and future directions. In T. C. Urdan, & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, v. 16A—The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 105165). London, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/S0749-7423(2010)000016A007
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.114 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2020
Published on: Jul 3, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Hallgeir Halvari, Anja Olafsen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.