Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Causality Orientations in the Work Setting: Scale Development and Validation Cover

Causality Orientations in the Work Setting: Scale Development and Validation

Open Access
|Jul 2020

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Demographic characteristics of the participants in the two samples.

Sample 1Sample 2
N201299
Gender
Female62.7%98%
Male37.3%2%
Age
Range (years)25–6422–66
Mean (years)45.1842.71
Standard deviation (years)10.3312.63
Education
High school (%)0.00.7
Basic education1 (%)13.95.4
Bachelor’s degree2 (%)77.691.9
Master’s degree (%)8.52.0

[i] 1 Sample 1: Bank academy, lower degree. Sample 2: 1 year university education. 2 Sample 1: Bank academy, higher degree. Sample 2: Bachelor’s degree.

Table 2

Results from explorative maximum likelihood factor analysis with oblimin rotation.

Scenario/Item numberScenario/ItemImpersonal orientationControl orientationAutonomy orientation
1Imagine: You are asked to participate in a new work-project that you are unfamiliar with. How likely is it that you think/feel:
1.1 AutonomyThink it will be interesting to try something new–0.190.110.43
1.2 ControlFeel that I have to do it to satisfy my manager0.310.420.04
1.3 ImpersonalFeel that usually I don’t like new things, so why should I try?0.240.40–0.02
2Imagine: Your manager has informed you that you should set goals for your work. You will probably:
2.1 AutonomySet your own challenging goals–0.20–0.120.61
2.2 ControlFeel pressured to set yourself goals0.170.540.09
2.3 ImpersonalNot want to set goals because it is not certain you will achieve them0.680.31–0.34
3Imagine: Your manager has informed about you the use of new procedures at work that can improve performance. The first thing you think is:
3.1 AutonomyThis will be interesting and important for me to try–0.31/–0.34–0.10/–0.170.66/0.63
3.2 ControlI will feel pressure within me to do as the manager says.0.35/0.340.76/0.74–0.13/–0.20
3.3 ImpersonalIt will probably be futile for me to do it0.64/0.620.41/0.41–0.37/–0.43
4Imagine: Your manager suggests new routines to improve work performance. You will probably think/feel:
4.1 AutonomyIt will be important for me to try this to see if it improves my work–0.31–0.020.59
4.2 ControlI have to do this to satisfy my manager0.360.740.03
4.3 ImpersonalI will be afraid I won’t be able to manage the tasks0.390.56–0.02
5Imagine: Your work has not been performed to its usual standard. To do something about this, you will probably:
5.1 AutonomyFind out where the problem lies so you can set yourself new goals–0.260.040.78
5.2 ControlGo to your manager so he/she can decide what you should do–0.020.290.38
5.3 ImpersonalIgnore the problem, as it is difficult to do something about work performance0.760.34–0.31
6Imagine: You are in your manager’s office and you discover that there is something he/she is not satisfied with regarding your work. Your first reaction will probably be:
6.1 AutonomyI want to talk with my manager to figure out what I can do to carry out of my job in the best way possible–0.340.030.83
6.2 ControlI will get a bad conscience and feel that I have to improve0.140.570.22
6.3 ImpersonalTo feel that it is hard to do something about this; what has happened, has happened0.640.27–0.24
7Imagine: Your manager wants you be more self-driven and independent in your job. The first thing you think will probably be:
7.1 AutonomyThis will be important for me to try, to see if it works–0.37/–0.33–0.03/–0.090.72/0.74
7.2 ControlFeel pressure to do as my manager says0.12/0.100.78/0.800.03/0.03
7.3 ImpersonalIt is hard to do something about things like independence, I am who I am0.72/0.670.34/0.34–0.38/–0.41
8Imagine: Your manager has asked you to do something about your interest in work, which has been a bit low lately. You will probably think/feel:
8.1 AutonomyI want to talk to my manager to see if we can find a good solution–0.35/–0.380.04/–0.030.76/0.76
8.2 ControlFeel pressured to do something so my manager is satisfied0.22/0.190.80/0.82–0.03/–0.03
8.3 ImpersonalThink that to be honest, I cannot really change my basic interest in work0.76/0.700.32/0.31–0.41/–0.45
9Imagine: Your manager has asked you to take a course to strengthen your work competence. You will probably think/feel:
9.1 AutonomyThink that this will be interesting and exciting–0.28/–0.290.01/–0.040.63/0.58
9.2 ControlFeel I have to do it to satisfy my manager0.37/0.360.74/0.73–0.06/–0.12
9.3 ImpersonalFeel that I have a certain competence, but there is not much I can do to change it0.75/0.730.26/0.28–0.29/–0.33
10Imagine: Your manager has suggested that you work with a more experienced employee to increase your job skills. You will probably think/feel:
10.1 AutonomyThink that this will be important for me–0.33/–0.40–0.01/–0.110.71/0.76
10.2 ControlFeel pressured to do it to keep my work tasks and job0.36/0.380.72/0.750.01/–0.11
10.3 ImpersonalThink, to be honest, I cannot change my skill level0.80/0.880.21/0.23–0.34/–0.43
11Imagine: Your manager has asked you to cooperate more with your colleagues at work. You will probably think/feel/do:
11.1 AutonomyFind out who I should collaborate with and contact them–0.36/–0.430.07/–0.020.71/0.74
11.2 ControlFeel pressure to cooperate on something I prefer to do alone0.38/0.390.59/0.60–0.08/–0.19
11.3 ImpersonalFeel that, frankly, I cannot do much to change my social attitude0.80/0.840.25/0.27–0.33/–0.44

[i] Note: Factor loadings before slash are from 33 items (11 vignettes), and factor loadings after the slash are from 18 items (6 vignettes).

Table 3

Results from the CFA in the two samples.

Scenario/Item numberFactor loadingt-values
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 1Sample 2
3
3.1 Autonomy0.620.587.00810.592
3.2 Control0.740.7017.76017.931
3.3 Impersonal0.670.5313.5166.865
7
7.1 Autonomy0.730.6811.55212.404
7.2 Control0.690.7014.88915.975
7.3 Impersonal0.770.5015.6177.799
8
8.1 Autonomy0.770.6310.28911.890
8.2 Control0.730.7816.08221.680
8.3 Impersonal0.750.5710.5409.550
9
9.1 Autonomy0.590.696.6748.349
9.2 Control0.770.7720.39325.864
9.3 Impersonal0.690.7612.48716.501
10
10.1 Autonomy0.760.6615.80113.502
10.2 Control0.810.7725.31119.606
10.3 Impersonal0.750.6519.20712.841
11
11.1 Autonomy0.750.7014.73316.272
11.2 Control0.650.6512.48315.683
11.3 Impersonal0.770.7214.21916.386
Table 4

Zero-order correlations among causality orientations and work-related correlates.

VariableSample 1Sample 2
MSDAOCOIOMSDAOCOIO
Autonomy orientation (AO)5.771.06–      6.180.82–      
Control orientation (CO)3.851.34–0.07      –      3.571.55–0.17**  –      
Impersonal orientation (IO)2.321.05–0.41***0.43***–      1.950.92–0.55***0.37***–      
Autonomy need satisfaction4.961.090.32***–0.08      –0.18*    5.461.060.31***–0.34***–0.16**  
Competence need satisfaction6.120.710.38***–0.14*    –0.31**  6.220.660.34***–0.20***–0.29***
Relatedness need satisfaction–      –      –      –      5.800.980.28***–0.23***–0.13*    
Autonomous work motivation5.151.060.22**  –0.06      –0.21**  5.830.920.42***–0.26***–0.35***
Controlled work motivation3.720.960.10      0.18*    –0.12      2.790.820.03      0.37***0.07      
Affective commitment4.331.100.40***0.03      –0.08      5.651.050.23**  –0.23**  –0.21**  
Turnover intentions2.511.34–0.16*    0.03      0.15*    2.291.39–0.17**  0.28***0.10      
Work engagement–      –      –      5.671.120.29***–0.26***–0.18**  
Burnout–      –      –      3.311.40–0.13*    0.32**  0.14*    
Gender10.630.480.22**  –0.03      –0.11      1.980.14–      –      –      
Age45.1810.330.01      0.01      0.12      42.7112.63–0.14*    –0.05      0.08      

[i] Note: M = Mean, SD = Standard Deviation, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05. Skew values varied for Sample 1 from –0.30 to 0.75, except for a value of –1.61 for autonomy orientation. For Sample 2 skew values varied from –1.26 to 1.18. For gender: 1 = males; 2 = females. 1 Correlations between gender and causality orientations are Spearman’s point biserial, which are omitted for the dental hygienists because there were only six males in the sample.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.114 | Journal eISSN: 2002-2867
Language: English
Page range: 6 - 6
Submitted on: Feb 5, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2020
Published on: Jul 3, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Hallgeir Halvari, Anja Olafsen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.