Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Developing Understandings of Disability through a Constructivist Paradigm: Identifying, Overcoming (and Embedding) Crip-Dissonance Cover

Developing Understandings of Disability through a Constructivist Paradigm: Identifying, Overcoming (and Embedding) Crip-Dissonance

By:  and    
Open Access
|Feb 2022

References

  1. Ackermann, Edith. 2012. “Edith Ackermann (MIT) Talk at The Beyond Bits And Atoms Class, Stanford University, 19 Oct 2012”. Accessed June 5, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz9yHiaVES8.
  2. Albrecht, Gary, Kathleen Seelman, and Michael Bury. 2001. “Introduction: The formation of disability studies”. In Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Gary Albrecht, Kathleen Seelman, and Michael Bury, 1168. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  3. Al-Saggaf, Yeslam, and Kirsty Williamson. 2006. “Doing ethnography from within a constructivist paradigm to explore virtual communities in Saudi Arabia.” Qualitative Sociology Review, 2(2): 520.
  4. Barton, Len. 1996. Disability and society: Emerging Issues and Insights. London: Longman.
  5. Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  6. Bubic, Andreja, D. Yves von Cramon, Thomas Jacobsen, Erich Schröger, and Ricarda Schubotz. 2009. “Violation of expectation: Neural correlates reflect bases of prediction”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21(1): 15568. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21013
  7. Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
  8. Clair, Matthew. 2018. “Stigma.” In Core Concepts in Sociology, edited by J. Michael Ryan, 318321. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
  9. Dean, Mitchell. 1998. “Questions of Method.” In The Politics of Constructionism, edited by Irving Velody and Robin Williams, 18399. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279014.n14
  10. Dixon, Simon, Ceri Smith, and Anel Touchet. 2018. “The disability perception gap: Policy report.” Accessed October 30, 2019. https://www.scope.org.uk/scope/media/files/campaigns/disability-perception-gap-report.pdf
  11. Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  12. Fine, Michelle, and Maria Elena Torre. 2019. “Critical Participatory Action Research: A Feminist Project for Validity and Solidarity.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 43(4): 43344. DOI: 10.1177/0361684319865255
  13. Finkelstein, Vic. 2001. “A personal journey into Disability Politics.” Speech, Leeds University Centre for Disability Studies, February 7, 2001. Accessed November 7, 2021. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/finkelstein-presentn.pdf
  14. Gabel, Susan, and Susan Peters. 2004. “Presage of a paradigm shift? Beyond the social model of disability toward resistance theories of disability”. Disability & Society 19(6): 585600. DOI: 10.1080/0968759042000252515
  15. Gallagher, Deborah. 2004. “The Importance of Constructivism and Constructivist Pedagogy for Disability Studies in Education.” Disability Studies Quarterly 24(2). DOI: 10.18061/dsq.v24i2.489
  16. Garland-Thompson, Rosemarie. 2012. “The Case for Conserving Disability.” Bioethical Inquiry 9: 339355. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-012-9380-0
  17. Gergen, Kenneth. 2001. Social construction in context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  18. Goethals, Tina, Elisabeth de Schauwer, and Geert van Hove. 2015. “Weaving intersectionality into disability studies research: Inclusion, reflexivity and anti-essentialism.” Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies 2(1–2): 7594. DOI: 10.11116/jdivegendstud.2.1-2.0075
  19. Gollwitzer, Mario, Anna Thorwart, and Karin Meissner. 2018. “Editorial: Psychological responses to violations of expectations.” Frontiers in Psychology 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02357
  20. Goodley, Dan. 2013. “Dis/entangling critical disability studies.” Disability & Society 28(5): 63144. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2012.717884
  21. Goodley, Dan. 2014. Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. Oxford: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203366974
  22. Goodley, Dan. 2017. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.
  23. Goodley, Dan, Magda Szarota, and Agnieszka Wołowicz. 2020. “Possible and Disability.” In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, edited by Vlad Glăveanu. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_64-1
  24. Grenier, Michelle. 2007. “Inclusion in Physical Education: From the Medical Model to Social Constructionism.” Quest 59(3): 298310. DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2007.10483554
  25. Grue, Jan. 2016. “The social meaning of disability: A reflection on categorisation, stigma and identity.” Sociology of Health & Illness 38(6): 957964. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12417
  26. Hahn, Harlan. 2001. “Attitudes toward disabilities: A research note on activists with disabilities.” Journal of Disability Policy Studies 12(1): 4046. DOI: 10.1177/104420730101200105
  27. Hartigan, John. 2005. “The end of social construction: What comes next?” Social Analysis 49(2): 205212. DOI: 10.3167/015597705780886301
  28. Harvey, Lee. 1990. Critical social research. London: Unwin Hyman.
  29. Held, David. 1980. Introduction to critical theory. London: Polity Press. DOI: 10.1525/9780520341272
  30. Hennink, Monique, Inge Hutter, and Ajay Bailey. 2013. Qualitative research methods. London: Sage.
  31. Hosking, David. “Critical disability theory.” Paper presented at 4th Biennial Disability Studies Conference, Lancaster University, UK, September 2008.
  32. Jones, Susan. 1996. “Toward inclusive theory: disability as social construction.” NASPA Journal 33(4): 34754. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1996.11072421
  33. Jost, John, and Arie Kruglanski. 2002. “The Estrangement of social constructionism and experimental social psychology: History of the rift and prospects for reconciliation.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 6(3): 168187. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_1
  34. Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  35. Kelly, George. 1963. A theory of personality: The psychology of personal constructs. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
  36. Kitchin, Rob. 1998. “‘Out of place’, ‘Knowing one’s place’: Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people.” Disability & Society 13(3): 34356. DOI: 10.1080/09687599826678
  37. Leivada, Evelina, Maria Kambanaros, and Kleanthes Grohmann. 2017. “The locus preservation hypothesis: Shared linguistic profiles across developmental disorders and the resilient part of the human language faculty.” Frontiers in Psychology 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01765
  38. Lincoln, Yvonna, and Egon Guba. 1985. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury, California: Sage. DOI: 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
  39. Linton, Simi. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
  40. Lynch, Michael. 1998. “Towards a constructivist genealogy of social constructivism.” In The Politics of Constructionism, edited by Irving Velody and Robin Williams, 1432. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279014.n2
  41. McLeod, Saul. 2018. “Cognitive Dissonance Theory.” Accessed February 5, 2019. https://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html
  42. McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: NYU Press.
  43. McRuer, Robert. “Crip Times: Disability, Globalization and Resistance.” Paper presented at the Inaugural Fordham Distinguished Lecture on Disability, Fordham University, New York, April 2016.
  44. Meekosha, Helen, and Russell Shuttleworth. 2009. “What’s so ‘critical’ about critical disability studies?” Australian Journal of Human Rights 15(1): 4775. DOI: 10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861
  45. Morris, Jenny. 1993. Pride against prejudice. London: The Women’s Press.
  46. Navon, Liora. 1996. “Beyond constructionism and pessimism: Theoretical implications of leprosy destigmatisation campaigns in Thailand.” Sociology of Health and Illness 18(2): 258276. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10935001
  47. Oliver, Mike. 1996. Understanding Disability. London: Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6
  48. Oliver, Mike, and Colin Barnes. 2012. The new politics of disablement. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-230-39244-1
  49. Olsen, Jason, Miro Griffiths, Armineh Soorenian, and Rebecca Porter. 2020. “Reporting from the margins: Disabled academics’ reflections on higher education.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 22(1): 26574. DOI: 10.16993/sjdr.670
  50. Passanante Elman, Julie. 2012. “Cripping safe sex.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9(3): 317326. DOI: 10.1007/s11673-012-9379-6
  51. Piaget, Jean. 1952. The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press. DOI: 10.1037/11494-000
  52. Pilson, Anna. 2020. “Critical Disability Studies and Participatory Action Research: Antidotes to educational research’s inherent ‘othering’?” In Interventions in Disabled Childhood Studies, edited by Dan Goodley, Katherine Runswick-Cole, and Kirsty Liddiard, 4954. Sheffield: iHuman Press.
  53. Rabinow, Paul, and Nikolas Rose. 2006. “Biopower today.” BioSocieties 1: 195217. DOI: 10.1017/S1745855206040014
  54. Reskin, Barbara. 2000. “The proximate causes of employment discrimination.” Contemporary Sociology 29(2): 319328. DOI: 10.2307/2654387
  55. Raskin, Jonathan. 2002. “Constructivism in psychology: Personal construct psychology, radical constructivism, and social constructionism.” In Studies in meaning: Exploring constructivist psychology, edited by Jonathan Raskin and Sara Bridges, 126. New York: Pace University Press.
  56. Raskin, Jonathan, and Sara Bridges. 2004. Studies in meaning 2. New York: Pace University Press.
  57. Ryan, Gemma. 2018. “Introduction to positivism, interpretivism and critical theory.” Nurse Researcher 25(4): 1420. DOI: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1466
  58. Schaller, Mark. 2002. “Any theory can be useful theory, even if it gets on our nerves.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 6(3): 199203. DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_5
  59. Schwandt, Thomas. 1994. “Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry”. Handbook of qualitative research, edited by Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln, 118137. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  60. Shakespeare, Tom. 1998. “Social constructionism as a political strategy.” In The Politics of Constructionism, edited by Irving Velody and Robin Williams, 168181. London: Sage. DOI: 10.4135/9781446279014.n13
  61. Shelton, Summer. “Not an Inspiration Just for Existing: How Advertising Uses Physical Disabilities as Inspiration: A Categorization and Model.” Paper presented at AEJMC Southeast Colloquium, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas. March 2017.
  62. Siebers, Tobin. 2001. “Disability in theory: From social constructionism to the new realism of the body.” American Literary History 13(4): 737754. DOI: 10.1093/alh/13.4.737
  63. Smith, Dorothy. 1972. The Conceptual Practices of Power. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
  64. Snape, Dawn, and Liz Spencer. 2012. “The Foundations of qualitative research.” In Qualitative research practice, edited by Jane Ritchie and Jane Lewis, 123. London: Sage.
  65. Sommers-Flanagan, John. 2012. Counseling and psychotherapy theories in context and practice study guide. Hoboken: Wiley.
  66. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. 1975. “Fundamental principles of disability.” Accessed December 27, 2018. https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf
  67. UK Government. 2010. “Equality Act.” Accessed September 25, 2020. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents
  68. Vehmas, Simo and Nick Watson. 2014. “Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: A critique of critical disability studies.” Disability & Society 29(4): 638650. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2013.831751
  69. Vygotsky, Lev. 1987. The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol.1, Problems of general psychology. Including the volume Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum. (N. Minick, Trans.).
  70. Wadsworth, Barry. 2004. Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. New York: Longman.
  71. Yates, Scott. 2015. “Neoliberalism and disability: The possibilities and limitations of a Foucauldian critique.” Foucault Studies 19: 84107. DOI: 10.22439/fs.v0i19.4826
  72. Young, Richard, and Audrey Collin. 2004. “Introduction: Constructivism and social constructionism in the career field.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 64(3): 373388. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.005
  73. Yousaf, Omar, and Fernand Gobet. 2013. “The emotional and attitudinal consequences of religious hypocrisy: Experimental evidence using a cognitive dissonance paradigm.” The Journal of Social Psychology 153(6): 667686. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2013.814620
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.843 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 15 - 28
Submitted on: Jun 13, 2021
Accepted on: Dec 1, 2021
Published on: Feb 22, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2022 Jason Olsen, Anna Pilson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.