Work and Invisible Disabilities: Practices, Experiences and Understandings of (Non)Disclosure

Maria Norstedt

doi:10.16993/sjdr.550

Work and Invisible Disabilities: Practices, Experiences and Understandings of (Non)Disclosure

Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research

Volume 21 (2019): Issue 1

By: Maria Norstedt

Open Access

|Jan 2019

Abstract

Invisible disabilities involve dilemmas that differentiate them from visible disabilities. However, little is known about the situation persons with invisible disabilities face at work, as empirical studies are scarce. The present article contributes in-depth knowledge of practices, experiences and understandings that affect the work situation for people with invisible disabilities in a Swedish context. The article draws on qualitative, in-depth interviews with 10 persons with invisible disabilities and seven persons who – in their professional work as employers, HR managers, medical doctors or psychologists in the occupational healthcare – regularly have dealings with persons with invisible disabilities. The analysis shows how practices, experiences and understandings regarding disclosure differ between the two groups of informants – differences that lead to dilemmas for the persons with invisible disabilities. These results indicate that persons with invisible disabilities are in a vulnerable position despite the fact that working life in Sweden is relatively well-regulated.

References

Allvin, Michael. 2004. ‘The Individualization of Labour.’ In: Learning to be employable: new agendas on work, responsibility, and learning in a globalizing world, Christina Garsten, and Kerstin Jacobsson (eds.), 23–42. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beatty, Joe E. 2012. ‘Career Barriers Experienced by People with Chronic Illness: A U.S Study.’ Employ Response Rights Journal 24(2): 91–110. DOI: 10.1007/s10672-011-9177-z
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Hanna, Hisayo Katsui, and Janice McLaughlin. 2009. ‘(Dis)abling practices and theories?: exploring chronic illness in disability studies.’ Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19(1): 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/15017419.2016.1269535
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Burnard, Philip. 1991. ‘A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research’. Nurse Education Today 11(6): 461–466. DOI: 10.1016/0260-6917(91)90009-Y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2009. Contours of Ableism. The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230245181
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Charmaz, Kathy. 1991. Good Days Bad Days: The Self in Chronic Illness and Time. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers Univ. Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Charmaz, Kathy. 2010. ‘Disclosing illness and disability in the workplace.’ Journal of International Education in Business 3(1/2): 6–19. DOI: 10.1108/18363261011106858
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
DeVault, Marjorie L., and Liza McCoy. 2006. ‘Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations’. In: Institutional Ethnography as Practice, Dorothy E. Smith (ed.), 15–44. Lanham (US): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eriksen, John, and Siri Naess. 1998. Epilepsi og diabetes. Livskvalitet, stigmatisering og mestring. NOVA-rapport 16/98, Oslo.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Esping-Anderson, Gøsta. 2003. ‘Towards the Good Society, Once Again?’ In: Why We Need a New Welfare State. DOI: 10.1093/0199256438.003.0001
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foster, Deborah, and Victoria Wass. 2013. ‘Disability in the Labour Market: An Exploration of Concepts of the Ideal Worker and Organisational Fit that Disadvantage Employees with Impairments.’ Sociology 47(4): 705–721. DOI: 10.1177/0038038512454245
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foucault, Michel. 1985. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Foucault, Michel. 1990. The History of Sexuality. Volume I. The Will to Knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garsten, Christina, and Kerstin Jacobsson. (ed.) 2004. Learning to be Employable: New Agendas on Work, Responsibility, and Learning in a Globalizing World, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Germundsson, Per, and Ingrid Runesson. 2014. ‘Unga med funktionsnedsättning. Om sysselsättningsvillkoren på den flexibla arbetsmarknaden’. In: Den långa vägen till arbetsmarknaden. Om unga utanför, Jonas Olofsson (ed.), 255–270. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goffman, Erving. 1963/1986. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hazer, John T., and Karen W. Bedell. 2000. ‘Effects of Seeking Accommodation and Disability on Preemployment Evaluations.’ Journal of Applied Social Psychology 30(6): 1201–1223. DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02517.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hughes, Bill, and Kevin Paterson. 1997. ‘The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of Impairment.’ Disability & Society 12(3): 325–340. DOI: 10.1080/09687599727209
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jans, Lita, H. Kaye, and Erica Jones. 2012. ‘Getting Hired: Successfully Employed People with Disabilities Offer Advice on Disclosure, Interviewing, and Job Search.’ Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 22(2): 155–165. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-011-9336-y
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jones, Amanda. 2011. ‘Disclosure of Mental Illness in the Workplace: A Literature Review.’ American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation 14(3): 212–229. DOI: 10.1080/15487768.2011.598101
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Larsson Tholén, Susanna, and Berth Danermark. 2015. ‘Inledning’. In: Arbetsliv för alla. Funktionsnedsättning och Arbete, Susanna Larsson Tholén, and Berth Danermark (eds.), 9–20. Malmö: Gleerups.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lingsom, Susan. 2008. ‘Invisible Impairments: Dilemmas of Concealment and Disclosure.’ Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10(1): 2–16. DOI: 10.1080/15017410701391567
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Madden, Sue, and Jim Sim. 2006. ‘Creating meaning in fibromyalgia syndrome.’ Social Science & Medicine 63(11): 2962–2973. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.06.020
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Matthews, Cynthia K. 1994. To tell or not to tell: The management of privacy boundaries by the invisibly disabled. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association. San Jose, CA.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mullins, Laura, and Michelle Preyede. 2012. ‘The Lived Experience of Students with an Invisible Disability at a Canadian University.’ Disability & Society 28(2): 147–160. DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2012.752127
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Munir, Fehmidah, Stavroula Leka, and Amanda Griffiths. 2005. ‘Dealing with self-management of chronic illness at work: predictors for self-closure.’ Social Science and Medicine 60(6): 1397–1407. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Munir, Fehmidah, Joanna Yarker, and Cheryl Haslam. 2008. ‘Sickness absence management: Encouraging attendance or ‘risk-taking’ presenteeism in employees with chronic illness?’ Disability & Rehabilitation 30(19): 1461–1472. DOI: 10.1080/09638280701637380
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Norstedt, Maria. 2015. Arbeidsliv och funksjonshindre. Institusjonelle paradoxer. In: I hjertet av velferdsstaten. En invitasjon til institusjonell etnografi, Karin Widerberg (ed.), 101–122. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Norstedt, Maria. 2017. The (im)possibilities of working again after a stroke WORK. A Journal of Prevention, Assessment, and Rehabilitation 56(4): 637–647. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-172521
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Norstedt, Maria, and Janne Paulsen Breimo. 2016. ‘Moving Beyond Everyday Life in Institutional Ethnographies: Methodological Challenges and Ethical Dilemmas.’ Forum: Qualitative Social Research. Socialforschung 17(2): Art. 3. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-17.2.2539
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Priestley, Mark. 1998. ‘Constructions and Creations: Idealism, Materialism and Disability Theory.’ Disability & Society 13(1): 75–94. DOI: 10.1080/09687599826920
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Priestley, Mark. 2003. Disability. A Life Course Approach. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Prince, Michael J. 2017. ‘Persons with invisible disabilities and workplace accommodation: Findings from a scoping literature review.’ Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 46(1): 75–86. DOI: 10.3233/JVR-160844
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rankin, Janet. 2017. ‘Conducting Analysis in Institutional Ethnography: Analytical Work Prior to Commencing Data Collection.’ International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/1609406917734484
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Roman, Leslie G. 2009. ‘Go Figure’! Public Pedagogies, invisible impairments and the performative paradoxes of visibility as veracity.’ International Journal of Inclusive Education 13(7): 677–698. DOI: 10.1080/13603110903041920
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Samuels, Ellen. 2003. ‘My Body, My Closet: Invisible Disability and the Limits of Coming-Out Discourse.’ GLQ 9(1–2): 233–255. DOI: 10.1215/10642684-9-1-2-233
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Santuzzi, Alecia, et al. 2014. ‘Invisible Disabilities: Unique Challenges for Employees and Organizations.’ Industrial and Organizational Psychology 7(2): 204–219. DOI: 10.1111/iops.12134
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Scambler, Sasha. 2012. ‘Long-term disabling conditions and disability theory.’ In: Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies Nick Watson, Alan Poulstone, and Carol Thomas (eds.), 136–150. Routledge: New York.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Seing, Ida, et al. 2012. ‘Policy and Practice of Work Ability: A Negotiation of Responsibility in Organizing Return to Work.’ Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 22(4): 553–564. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9371-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, Dorothy E. 1987. The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, Dorothy E. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People, Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smith, Dorothy E. 2006. Institutional Ethnography as Practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spirito-Dalgin, Rebecca, and James Bellini. 2008. ‘Invisible Disability in an Employment Interview: Impact on Employers’ Hiring Decisions and Views of Employment’. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin 52(1): 6–15. DOI: 10.1177/0034355207311311
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stone, Sharon Dale. 2005. ‘Reactions to Invisible Disability: Experiences of Young Women Survivors of Hemorrhagic Stroke.’ Disability & Rehabilitation 27(2): 293–304. DOI: 10.1080/09638280400008990
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Teghtsoonian, Kathrine. 2016. ‘Methods, Discourse, Activism: Comparing Institutional Ethnography and Governmentality.’ Critical Policy Studies 10(13): 330–347. DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2015.1050426
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thomas, Carol. 2007. Sociologies of Disability and Illness. Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology, New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-02019-2
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vickers, Margret H. 2003. ‘Expectations of Consistency on Organizational Life: Stories of Inconsistency from People With Unseen Chronic Illness.’ Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 15(2): 85–98. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023524714053
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
von Schrader, Sarah, Valerie Malzer, and Susanne Bruyère. 2014. ‘Perspectives on Disability Disclosure: The Importance of Employer Practices and Workplace Climate.’ Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal 26(4): 237–255. DOI: 10.1007/s10672-013-9227-9
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wendell, Susan. 1989. ‘Toward a Feminist Theory of Disability.’ Hypatia. A journal of Feminist Philosophy 4(2): 104–124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1989.tb00576
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wendell, Susan. 2001. ‘Unhealthy Disabled: Treating Chronic Illness as Disabilities.’ Hypatia. A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 16(4): 17–33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2001.tb00751.x
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Whitt, Jason, Brian Cawley, Julie Yonker, and Daniella Polage. 2014. ‘The Value of Virtue: An Organizational Approach to the Challenges of Workplace Disabilities.’ Industrial and Organizational Psychology 7(2): 265–269. DOI: 10.1111/iops.12146
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilson-Kovacs, Dana, Michelle Ryan, S. Alexander Haslam, and Anna Rabinovich. 2008. ‘Just because You Can Get a Wheelchair in the Building doesn’t Necessarily Mean that You Can Still Participate’: Barriers to the Career Advancement of Disabled Professionals.’ Disability & Society 23(7): 705–717. DOI: 10.1080/09687590802469198
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wilton, Robert D. 2006. ‘Disability disclosure in the workplace.’ Just Labour 8: 24–39. Accessed 2018 May 17. http://www.justlabour.yorku.ca/volume8/pdfs/02%20Wilton.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Åsbring, Pia and Anna-Liisa Närvänen. 2002. ‘Women’s experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia.’ Qualitative Health Research 12(2): 148–160. DOI: 10.1177/104973230201200202
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article