Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Vulnerable Youth – Dependency or Independence? School Experiences, Transitions and Adaptation to and within Adult Life Cover

Vulnerable Youth – Dependency or Independence? School Experiences, Transitions and Adaptation to and within Adult Life

Open Access
|Oct 2018

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Assumed relationships among individual and structural factors, participation in full-time employment and type of living situation at age 28 to 29 years.

Table 1

Multivariate analysis. How six independent variables affect adaptation to adult life in two domains of life among former students on special terms aged 28–29 years, odd ratios.

Risk of not having full-time employment
N = 357
Risk of dependent living situation
N = 357
Types of difficulties
0. No PSD or LD
1. LD but no PSD0.71.3
2. PSD but no LD3.4**2.6*
3. PSD and LD2.4*2.9*
Functional level
0. Functional level, first and second tercile
1. Functional level, third tercile0.92.4*
Teaching assistant or not
0. No teaching assistant
1. Teaching assistant2.3*1.3
Type of class
0. Regular class
1. Special class1.41.1
Educational results at the age of 20–21
0. Not delayed or did not drop out of school
1. Delayed or dropped out of school1.7*1.0
Gender
0. Male
1. Female6.8***0.5*
Nagelkerke R20.3140.124

[i] Note: +p < 0.10; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. 0 is the reference category for each variable. The Nagelkerke R2 coefficient indicates that the model fit is reasonably good, especially in terms of full-time employment.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.34 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 296 - 305
Submitted on: May 25, 2017
Accepted on: Aug 12, 2018
Published on: Oct 29, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Emmy Elizabeth Langøy, Rune Kvalsund, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.