Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Child Involvement in a Support Development Programme in Residential Services: A Secondary Analysis Cover

Child Involvement in a Support Development Programme in Residential Services: A Secondary Analysis

Open Access
|Aug 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Doing to, doing for and doing with: a model for understanding support in residential services. Merged from Nabatchi et al. (2017) and Norton (2021).

Table 1

Information on residences participating in the SDP.

PERIODRESIDENCENUMBER OF PERMANENT STAFFCHILD CASES
202001–202006A52
202009–202103B92
202101–202106C52
202109–202203D92
202201–202206E62
202209–202304F62
Table 2

Examples of configurations of child involvement in support interventions.

COMMUNICATIONPATTERNSUPPORT INTERVENTIONCHILD INVOLVEMENTDESIGNDELIVERY
Verbal communicationThe child eats lunch with designated staff in his room to avoid the stress that arose when the child ate with peers in the kitchen.Before designing the support intervention, staff had a dialogue with the child about how he experienced and wanted to improve the lunch situation. The child suggested eating in the room with the staff. During the intervention, lunchtimes became opportunities for the child and staff to design evening activities and discuss things that were important to him.YesYes
Communicated mostly through body languageA visual aid was implemented for choosing leisure activities.The design involved staff taking an inventory of the activities the child enjoyed. The visual support enabled the child to choose activities after school.PartlyPartly
Verbal communicationEnvironmental adaptations and visual aids were designed to reduce a child’s challenging behaviour when getting dressed.Staff designed and delivered support changes. The staff attempted to involve the child in the changes without success.NoNo
Table 3

An outline of the categories, sub-categories, and samples of representative quotes.

CATEGORYSUB-CATEGORYQUOTES
Doing toChildren as passive recipients‘I think it was also a lot about us (staff) coming up with a solution.’
Instructions‘So, pictures have worked, and clarity has been provided so he/she knows what is going to happen.’
Doing forEfforts to involve children‘How should we present this to the child? How should we involve the child?’
Promoting choice‘We gave the child the opportunity to choose different activities with pictures and so on.’
Doing withRecurring child and staff dialogue‘We had to sit down with the children and talk several times and try to find out what they think is the problem.’
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.1386 | Journal eISSN: 1745-3011
Language: English
Page range: 387 - 402
Submitted on: Oct 5, 2025
Accepted on: Aug 6, 2026
Published on: Aug 24, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Pontus Wallin, Annika Nordin, Christina Petersson, Kristina Areskoug Josefsson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.