
Figure 1
Trends in the use of the intersectional approach to interpret diversity discrimination. Source: Compilation based on Molina (2012).
Table 1
Synonyms of the original terms used in our bibliometric analysis.
| ORIGINAL TERMS | SYNONYMS OR RELATED TERMS TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT |
|---|---|
| Woman | Women; girl; girls; lady; ladies; female; females |
| Disability | Disabilities; disabled; disability; disabilities; handicap; handicaps; imparment; imparments; impared; incapacity; incapacities; incapacited; infirm; infirmity; infirmities; functional diversity; functional diversities |
| Work | Works; labour; labours; labor; labors; job; jobs; employment; employments; profession; professions; professional; professionals |
[i] Source: Own elaboration.

Figure 2
Annual publication frequency (2018–2022) on the theme ‘women, disability, and work’. Data source: Compilation based on biblioshiny software from bibliometrix.
Table 2
Ranking of the 20 authors according to the number of publications on the theme ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022).
| AUTHOR | h_index | g_index | m_index | QUOTES | PUBLICATIONS | FIRST PUBLICATION |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhang Y | 5 | 6 | 0.833 | 123 | 6 | 2018 |
| Jammaers E | 4 | 6 | 1 | 75 | 6 | 2020 |
| Mousa M | 4 | 6 | 1 | 49 | 6 | 2020 |
| Li Y | 3 | 6 | 0.6 | 53 | 6 | 2019 |
| Flores LY | 3 | 6 | 0.5 | 38 | 6 | 2018 |
| Williams J | 3 | 5 | 0.6 | 49 | 5 | 2019 |
| Kumar S | 3 | 4 | 0.75 | 21 | 5 | 2020 |
| Cooke FL | 3 | 4 | 1 | 53 | 4 | 2021 |
| Hennekam S | 3 | 4 | 0.75 | 38 | 4 | 2020 |
| Li X | 3 | 4 | 0.6 | 71 | 4 | 2019 |
| Tyler M | 3 | 4 | 0.6 | 59 | 4 | 2019 |
| Kim J | 3 | 4 | 0.6 | 48 | 4 | 2019 |
| Lee Y | 3 | 4 | 0.6 | 40 | 4 | 2019 |
| Kubacki K | 3 | 4 | 0.6 | 26 | 4 | 2019 |
| Wang J | 3 | 4 | 0.5 | 47 | 4 | 2018 |
| Bainbridge HTJ | 3 | 4 | 0.5 | 24 | 4 | 2018 |
| Liu H | 2 | 4 | 0.667 | 24 | 4 | 2021 |
| Spaaij R | 2 | 4 | 0.4 | 96 | 4 | 2019 |
| Li J | 2 | 4 | 0.333 | 67 | 4 | 2018 |
| Edwards J | 2 | 4 | 0.333 | 28 | 4 | 2018 |
[i] Source: Compilation based on the biblioshiny package from bibliometrix.

Figure 3
Ranking of the 20 journals according to the number of publications on the theme of ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022). Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny software package.
Table 3
Ranking of the top 20 universities according to the number of publications on the theme of ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022).
| UNIVERSITY | ARTICLES | COUNTRY |
|---|---|---|
| Griffith University | 25 | Australia |
| Monash University | 17 | Australia |
| Sydney University of Technology | 17 | Australia |
| Auckland University of Technology | 16 | New Zealand |
| University of Texas A&M | 16 | United States |
| University of California | 16 | United States |
| Macquarie University | 15 | United States |
| University of Alberta | 14 | Canada |
| University of Missouri | 14 | United States |
| University of York | 13 | Canada |
| Aarhus University | 12 | Denmark |
| RMIT University | 12 | Australia |
| Deakin University | 11 | Australia |
| Swinburne University of Technology | 11 | Australia |
| The University of Queensland | 11 | Australia |
| University of Göteborg | 11 | Sweden |
| University of Maryland | 11 | United States |
| Michigan University | 11 | United States |
| University of New South Wales | 11 | Australia |
| University of Tasmania | 11 | Australia |
[i] Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.
Table 4
Ranking of the top 20 nations according to the number of publications on the theme of ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022).
| COUNTRY | FREQUENCY OF PUBLICATION |
|---|---|
| United States | 1107 |
| United Kingdom | 450 |
| Australia | 334 |
| Canada | 233 |
| China | 161 |
| India | 130 |
| Germany | 125 |
| Netherlands | 81 |
| Spain | 81 |
| Italy | 80 |
| Sweden | 77 |
| France | 74 |
| Malaysia | 71 |
| South Africa | 62 |
| New Zealand | 53 |
| Belgium | 52 |
| Finland | 52 |
| South Korea | 40 |
| Norway | 38 |
| Portugal | 36 |
[i] Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.
Table 5
Ranking of countries according to the number of publications in the top 20 international scientific collaborations on the theme of ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022).
| COLLABORATION | FREQUENCY OF PUBLICATION |
|---|---|
| United States/Canada | 31 |
| United States/United Kingdom | 22 |
| United Kingdom/Australia | 20 |
| United States/Australia | 19 |
| United States/China | 19 |
| Australia/China | 14 |
| United States/Germany | 14 |
| United Kingdom/Canada | 13 |
| United Kingdom/Germany | 13 |
| United States/South Korea | 13 |
| United Kingdom/France | 12 |
| United Kingdom/Netherlands | 12 |
| United States/France | 11 |
| Australia/Canada | 10 |
| Netherlands/Belgium | 10 |
| Australia/New Zealand | 9 |
| United Kingdom/Belgium | 9 |
| United Kingdom/China | 9 |
| Australia/Netherlands | 8 |
| Australia/Germany | 7 |
[i] Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.
Table 6
Ranking with authorship of the 20 most cited articles on the theme of ‘women, disability, and work’ between 2018 and 2022.
| ARTICLE | QUOTES FROM THE ARTICLE |
|---|---|
| Shore LM, 2018, Hum Resour Manage Rev | 244 |
| De Vos A, 2020, J Vocat Behav | 197 |
| Gupta P, 2020, J Bus Res | 189 |
| Jiang L, 2018, J Manages | 184 |
| Kleine AK, 2019, J Organ Behav | 167 |
| Johnston CS, 2018, J Career Assessment | 166 |
| Puntoni S, 2021, J Mark | 152 |
| Fisk RP, 2018, J Serv Manage | 135 |
| Feng Z, 2020, Gender Management | 134 |
| Kossek EE, 2018, Acad Manage Annals | 126 |
| Anglin AH, 2018, J Bus Venturing | 125 |
| Blustein DL, 2019, J Career Assess | 124 |
| Jilke S, 2018, J Public Adm Res Theory | 109 |
| Pizam A, 2019, Int J Hosp Manage | 94 |
| Daks JS, 2020, J Contextual Behav Sci | 92 |
| Pak K, 2019, Hum Resour Manage Rev | 92 |
| Seron C, 2018, Work Occup | 85 |
| Choudrie J, 2018, J Bus Res | 84 |
| Lerchenmueller MJ, 2018, Res Policy | 81 |
| Yim MYC, 2019, J Bus Res | 80 |
[i] Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.
Table 7
Top 20 keywords related to 1,810 articles on ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022). Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.
| NUMBER OF OCCURRENCES OF THE KEYWORD IN THE ARTICLES CONCERNED | % PRESENCE OF THE KEYWORD IN THE CONSIDERED ARTICLES | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 100 | 13% |
| Disability | 85 | 11% |
| Diversity | 64 | 8% |
| Inclusion | 49 | 6% |
| Discrimination | 48 | 6% |
| Intersectionality | 45 | 6% |
| Employment | 41 | 5% |
| COVID-19 | 40 | 5% |
| Mental health | 40 | 5% |
| Women | 34 | 4% |
| Entrepreneurship | 30 | 4% |
| Well-being | 29 | 4% |
| Leadership | 23 | 3% |
| Stigma | 23 | 3% |
| Leisure | 22 | 3% |
| Social support | 20 | 3% |
| Career development | 19 | 2% |
| Health | 19 | 2% |
| Job satisfaction | 18 | 2% |
| Motivation | 18 | 2% |
[i] Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.

Figure 4
Concept map – multiple correspondence method – Cluster analysis of the keywords of the reference articles ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022). Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.

Figure 5
Network analysis of relationships between keywords in reference articles on the theme ‘women, disability, and work’ (2018–2022). Source: Compilation based on the bibliometrix biblioshiny package.
