Dépasser la binarité en discours : outils sémantico-syntaxiques

Marie Steffens

doi:10.16993/rnef.190

Dépasser la binarité en discours : outils sémantico-syntaxiques

Nordic Journal of Francophone Studies/ Revue nordique des études francophones

Volume 9 (2026): Issue 1

By: Marie Steffens

Open Access

|Feb 2026

Blanché, R. (1957). Opposition et négation. Revue Philosophique de la France et de l’étranger, 147, 187–216.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blank, A. (2000). Pour une approche cognitive du changement sémantique lexical : aspect sémasiologique. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, 9, 59–74.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coseriu, E. (1975). Vers une typologie des champs lexicaux. Cahiers de lexicologie, 27, 30–51.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Croft, W., & Cruse, A. (2004). Cognitive Linguistics. University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cruse, A. (1986). Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press (Textbooks Linguistics).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deese, J. (1964). The Associative Structure of Some Common English Adjectives. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 3(5), 347–357. 10.1016/S0022-5371(64)80001-3
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ducháček, O. (1965). Sur quelques problèmes de l’antonymie. Cahiers de lexicologie, 6, 55–66. 10.15122/isbn.978-2-8124-4259-9.p.0057
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grand Robert de la langue française. (2001). Paris, Sejer.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Harnad, S. (2017). Chapter 2: To Cognize is to Categorize: Cognition is Categorization. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (pp. 21–54). Elsevier. 10.1016/B978-0-08-101107-2.00002-6
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holliday, A. (2022). Searching for a Third-Space Methodology to Contest Essentialist Large-Culture Blocks. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 367–380. 10.1080/14708477.2022.2036180
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Holliday, A., Hyde, M., & Kullman, J. (2021). Intercultural Communication: An Advanced Resource Book for Students. Routledge. 10.4324/9780367482480
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jones, S. (2002). Antonymy: A Corpus-based Perspective. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203166253
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jones, S., & Murphy, L. (2005). Using Corpora to Investigate Antonym Acquisition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10(3), 401–422. 10.1075/ijcl.10.3.06jon
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jones, S., Murphy, L. M., Paradis, C., & Willners, C. (2012). Antonyms in English : Construals, Constructions and Canonicity. University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139032384
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Justeson, J., & Katz, S. (1991). Co-occurrences of Antonymous Adjectives and Their Contexts. Computational Linguistics, 17(1), 1–20.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kibédi Varga, Á. (1977). Les constantes du poème. Éditions A. & J. Picard.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lehrer, A., & Lehrer, K. (1982). Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy, 5, 483–501. 10.1007/BF00355584
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Muehleisen, V., & Isono, M. (2009). Antonymous Adjectives in Japanese Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2185–2203. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.037
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Murphy, L., Paradis, C., Willners, C., & Jones, S. (2009). Discourse Functions of Antonymy: A Cross-Linguistic Investigation of Swedish and English. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2159–2184. 10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.040
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ogden, C. K. (1932). Opposition: A Linguistic and Psychological Analysis. Indiana University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pütz, O. (2017). How Strangers Initiate Conversations: Interactions on Public Trains in Germany. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 47(4), 426–453. 10.1177/0891241617697792
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rivara, R. (1993). Adjectifs et structures sémantiques scalaires. L’information grammaticale, 58, 40–46. 10.3406/igram.1993.3154
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural Categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350. 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sapir, E. (1944). Grading: A Study in Semantics. Philosophy of Science, 2, 93–116. 10.1086/286828
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1989). La pertinence. Éditions de Minuit.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steffens, M. (2018). Antonymic Discourse Functions and Manipulation: A Corpus Analysis of Present-Day French. Corpus Pragmatics, 2, 313–332. 10.1007/s41701-018-0036-0
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steffens, M. (2019). L’antonymie : Fonctions sémantico-référentielles de la coprésence d’antonymes en français. Peeters (Orbis Supplementa 45). 10.2307/j.ctv1q26nv5
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political Psychology : Key Readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203505984-16
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Overbeke, M. (1975). Antonymie et gradation. Linguistique, 11, 135–155.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yorke, M. (2001). Bipolarity… or Not ? Some Conceptual Problems Relating to Bipolar Rating Scales. British Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 171–186. 10.1080/01411920120037126
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article