Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Youth Inclusion in Forest Policy Dialogue: Contemplating Human–Forest Relationships through Arts-Based Methods Cover

Youth Inclusion in Forest Policy Dialogue: Contemplating Human–Forest Relationships through Arts-Based Methods

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. Adeyeye, Y., Hagerman, S., & Pelai, R. (2019). Seeking procedural equity in global environmental governance: Indigenous participation and knowledge politics in forest and landscape restoration debates at the 2016 World Conservation Congress. Forest Policy and Economics, 109, 102006. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102006
  2. Ahn, C. (2016). A creative collaboration between the science of ecosystem restoration and art for sustainable stormwater management on an urban college campus. Restoration Ecology, 24(3), 291297. DOI: 10.1111/rec.12341
  3. Albrecht, E., Tokola N., Leppäsuo E., Sinkkonen J., Mustalahti I., Ratamäki O., & Viljanen J. (2020). Nuorten ilmastohuoli ja ympäristökansalaisuuden muotoutuminen. In E. Pekkarinen & T. Tuukkanen (Eds.), Maapallon tulevaisuus ja lapsen oikeudet. Lapsiasiavaltuutetun toimiston julkaisuja 2020:4. (In Finnish).
  4. Allaste, A.-A., & Tiidenberg, K. (Eds.) (2015). ‘In search of…’ New methodological approaches to youth research. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  5. Allgaier, J. (2013). On the Shoulders of YouTube: Science in Music Videos. Science Communication, 35(2), 266275. DOI: 10.1177/1075547012454949
  6. Andersson, E., & Shahrokh, T. (2013). Crossing boundaries with deliberation: But where are we going? In M. Rask, R. Worthington & M. Lammi (Eds.), Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance (pp. 88104). London: Routledge.
  7. Archibald, M. M. (2016). Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10(3), 228250. DOI: 10.1177/1558689815570092
  8. Bang, M., Faber, L., Gurneau, J., Marin, A., & Soto, C. (2016). Community-based design research: Learning across generations and strategic transformations of institutional relations toward axiological innovations. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(1), 2841. DOI: 10.1080/10749039.2015.1087572
  9. Barone, T., & Eisner, E. W. (2011). Arts based research. London: Sage.
  10. Barthel, S., Belton, S., Raymond, C., & Giusti, M. (2018). Fostering children’s connection to nature through authentic situations: The case of saving salamanders at school. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00928
  11. Bassols, M. M., Cros, A., & Torrent, A. M. (2013). Emotionalization in new television formats of science popularization. Pragmatics, 23(4), 605632. DOI: 10.1075/prag.23.4.02bas
  12. Belland, B. R. (2014). Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, K. Elen & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 505518). New York: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_39
  13. Bentz, J., & O’Brien, K. (2019). ART FOR CHANGE: Transformative learning and youth empowerment in a changing climate. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 7(1), 52. DOI: 10.1525/elementa.390
  14. Berglund, E. (2006). Ecopolitics through ethnography: The cultures of Finland’s forest-nature. In A. Biersack & J. B. Greenberg (Eds.), Reimagining Political Ecology (pp. 97120). Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv11317mb.8
  15. Bisbee O’Connell, K., Keys, B., Storksdieck, M., & Rosin, M. (2020). Context matters: Using art-based science experiences to broaden participation beyond the choir. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 120. DOI: 10.1080/21548455.2020.1727587
  16. Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 11911205. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191
  17. Bromme, R., Nückles, M., & Rambow, R. (1999). Adaptivity and anticipation in expert-laypeople communication. In S. E. Brennan, A. Giboin & D. Traum (Eds.), Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems (pp. 1724). AAAI 1999 Fall Symposium Series.
  18. Caillon, S., Cullman, G., Verschuuren, B., & Sterling, E. J. (2017). Moving beyond the human–nature dichotomy through biocultural approaches. Ecology and Society, 22(4), 27. DOI: 10.5751/ES-09746-220427
  19. Cammaerts, B., Bruter, M., Banaji, S., Harrison, S., & Anstead, N. (2016). Youth participation and exclusion: Towards equal treatment in public space, education and the workplace. In Youth Participation in Democratic Life (pp. 167196). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9781137540218_7
  20. Casas-Cortés, M. I., Osterweil, M., & Powell, D. E. (2008). Blurring boundaries: Recognizing knowledge-practices in the study of social movements. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(1), 1758. DOI: 10.1353/anq.2008.0006
  21. Coholic, D., Schinke, R., Oghene, O., Dano, K., Jago, M., McAlister, H., & Grynspan, P. (2020). Arts-based interventions for youth with mental health challenges. Journal of Social Work, 20(3), 269286. DOI: 10.1177/1468017319828864
  22. Crowther, G. (2012). Using science songs to enhance learning: An interdisciplinary approach. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(1), 2630. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.11-08-0068
  23. Davis, E., White, E. M., Cerveny, L. K., Seesholtz, D., Nuss, M. L., & Ulrich, D. R. (2017). Comparison of USDA forest service and stakeholder motivations and experiences in collaborative federal forest governance in the western United States. Environmental Management, 60, 908921. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-017-0913-5
  24. Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/0199258449.001.0001
  25. Doyle, T., MacEachern, D., & MacGregor, S. (2015). Environment and politics, 4th ed. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203383704
  26. Edmond, M. (2014). Here we go again: Music videos after YouTube. Television & New Media, 15(4), 305320. DOI: 10.1177/1527476412465901
  27. Egunyu, F., Reed, M., Sinclair, A. J., Parkins, J. R., & Robson, J. P. (2020). Public engagement in forest governance in Canada: Whose values are being represented anyway? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 50(11), 11521159. DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2020-0026
  28. Fields, D., Vasudevan V., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). The programmers’ collective: Fostering participatory culture by making music videos in a high school scratch coding workshop. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 613633. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2015.1065892
  29. Häyrinen, L., & Pynnönen, S. (2020). A review of the concepts and measurements for connection to nature and environmentally responsible behaviour—A call for research on human-forest relationships. Current Forestry Reports, 6, 323338. DOI: 10.1007/s40725-020-00131-6
  30. Higgins, J., Nairn, K., & Sligo, J. (2007). Peer research with youth. Negotiating (sub)cultural capital, place and participation in Aotearoa/New Zealand. In S. Kindon, R. Pain & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. Connecting people, participation and place. Abingdon: Routledge.
  31. Himberg, N. (2011). Traditionally protected forests’ role within transforming natural resource management regimes in Taita Hills, Kenya. Department of Geosciences and Geography A14. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/28128/traditio.pdf?sequence=1
  32. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 12771288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687
  33. Isin, E. F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of Citizenship (pp. 1543). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Jackson, K., & Bazeley, P. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo, 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
  35. Kallio, K.-P. (2018). Elettyä kansalaisuutta jäljittämässä: kansalaisuuden ulottuvuudet nuorisobarometrissa. In E. Pekkarinen & S. Myllyniemi (Eds.), Vaikutusvaltaa Euroopan laidalla. Nuorisobarometri 2018. Valtion nuorisoneuvosto, Nuorisotutkimusseura, Nuorisotutkimusverkosto & Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö. Keuruu: Printek. (In Finnish).
  36. Kaukko, M., & Wernersjö, U. (2017). Belonging and participation in liminality: Unaccompanied children in Finland and Sweden. Childhood, 24(1), 720. DOI: 10.1177/0907568216649104
  37. Keski-Luopa, L. (2009). Kohti kokonaisvaltaista ihmiskäsitystä. Minäfilosofiasta dialogiseen filosofiaan. Psykoterapia, 28(4), 277298. (In Finnish).
  38. Kleinschmit, D., Pülzl, H., Secco, L., Sergent, A., & Wallin, I. (2018). Orchestration in political processes: Involvement of experts, citizens, and participatory professionals in forest policy making. Forest Policy and Economics, 89, 415. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.011
  39. Klop, T., & Severiens, S. (2007). An exploration of attitudes towards modern biotechnology: A study among Dutch secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 663679. DOI: 10.1080/09500690600951556
  40. Korhonen, J., Giurca, A., Brockhaus, M., & Toppinen, A. (2018). Actors and politics in Finland’s forest-based bioeconomy network. Sustainability, 10(10), 3785. DOI: 10.3390/su10103785
  41. Laakkonen, A., Zimmerer, R., Kähkönen, T., Hujala, T., Takala, T., & Tikkanen, J. (2018). Forest owners’ attitudes toward pro-climate and climate-responsive forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 87, 110. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.11.001
  42. Lapum, J. L., Liu, L., Church, K., Yau, T. M., Ruttonsha, P., Matthews David, A., & Retta, B. (2014). Arts-informed research dissemination in the health sciences: An evaluation of peoples’ responses to “The 7,024th Patient” art installation. Sage Open, 4(1), 114. DOI: 10.1177/2158244014524211
  43. Leavy, P. (2015). Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
  44. Lee, L., Currie, V., Saied, N., & Wright, L. (2020). Journey to hope, self-expression and community engagement: Youth-led arts-based participatory action research. Children and Youth Services Review, 109, 104581. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104581
  45. Lenette, C. (2019). Why Arts-Based Research? In Arts-Based Methods in Refugee Research (pp. 2755). Singapore: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8008-2_2
  46. Lester, J. N., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to do qualitative data analysis: A starting point. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 94106. DOI: 10.1177/1534484320903890
  47. Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, 103632. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
  48. Lohmeyer, B. A. (2020). ‘Keen as fuck’: Youth participation in qualitative research as ‘parallel projects’. Qualitative Research, 20(1), 3955. DOI: 10.1177/1468794118816627
  49. Lougheed, S. C., & Coholic, D. A. (2018). Arts-Based Mindfulness Group Work with Youth Aging Out of Foster Care. Social Work with Groups, 41(1–2), 165178. DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2016.1258626
  50. MacDonald, A., Baguley, M., Barton, G., & Kerby, M. (2020). How arts-based methods are used to support the resilience and well-being of young people: a review of the literature. In L. McKay, G. Barton, S. Garvis & V. Sappa (Eds.), Arts-Based Research, Resilience and Well-being Across the Lifespan (pp. 2946). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-26053-8_3
  51. May, V. (2011). Self, Belonging and social change. Sociology, 45(3), 363378. DOI: 10.1177/0038038511399624
  52. McFadden, T. (2013). Music in the science classroom: The impact of content-based songs on learning and engagement. Thesis, Master of Science Communication, University of Otago. http://hdl.handle.net/10523/4203
  53. Mezirow, J. (1998). On Critical Reflection. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(3), 185198. DOI: 10.1177/074171369804800305
  54. (MoAF) Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2019). The National Forest Strategy 2025—Updated version. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2019:17. Helsinki.
  55. Mubeen, F. E., & Tokola, N. (2021). Kanssatutkimus ja vertaishaastattelut tutkimusmenetelmänä – pohdintoja toimijuudesta ja vallasta. In T. Rättilä, & P. Honkatukia (Eds.), Tutkien ja tarinoiden kohti pakolaistaustaisten nuorten kestävää hyvinvointia, 231, 144. Nuorisotutkimusverkosto & Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja. (In Finnish.) http://tutkienjatarinoiden.allyouthstn.fi/artikkelit/artikkeli7/
  56. Muhr, M. M. (2020). Beyond words–The potential of arts-based research on human-nature connectedness. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 249257. DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1811379
  57. Mustalahti, I. (2018). The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest-based bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 37813790. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132
  58. Navarro, C., & Font, J. (2013). The biased inclusiveness of local democratic innovations: Vehicles or obstacles for political equality? In B. Geißel & M. Joas (Eds.), Participatory Democratic Innovations in Europe: Improving the Quality of Democracy? (pp. 95122). Opladen, Berlin & Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvdf0gdc.8
  59. Northington, T. (2018). ArtThrust Teen Empowerment Program: Teaching Youth to Fly Against Resistance. Social Work with Groups, 41(1–2), 139150. DOI: 10.1080/01609513.2016.1277499
  60. Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Goldman, D., Hadjichambis, A. C., Parra, G., Lapin, K., Knippels, M.-C., & Van Dam, F. (2020). Educating for environmental citizenship in non-formal frameworks for secondary level youth. In A. C. Hadjichambis, P. Reis, D. Paraskeva-Hadjichambis, J. Cincera, J.Boeve-de Pauw, N. Gericke & M. C. Knippels (Eds.), Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education, 4, 213235. Environmental Discourses in Science Education. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20249-1_14
  61. Pekkarinen, E., & Myllyniemi, S. (Eds.) (2018). Vaikutusvaltaa Euroopan laidalla. Nuorisobarometri 2018. Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö, Valtion nuorisoneuvosto, Nuorisotutkimusseura & Nuorisotutkimusverkosto. (In Finnish).
  62. Peterson, W., Gerhard, G., Hunter, K., Marek, L., Phillips, C., & Titcomb, A. (2001). Developing positive youth: prepared & engaged youth serving American communities. National 4-H impact assessment project.
  63. Piercy, F. P., & Benson, K. (2005). Aesthetic forms of data representation in qualitative family therapy research. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31(1), 107119. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2005.tb01547.x
  64. Powers, J. L., & Tiffany, J. S. (2006). Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 12, S79S87. DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200611001-00015
  65. Pyyry, N. (2012). Nuorten osallisuus tutkimuksessa: Menetelmällisiä kysymyksiä ja vastausyrityksiä. Nuorisotutkimus, 31(1), 3553. (In Finnish).
  66. Rättilä, T., Sillanpää, O., Honkatukia, P., Koskelainen, K., & Rinne, J. (2021). Puntarissa pakolaistaustaisten nuorten hyvinvointi – tutkimusyhteistyötä taideperustaisilla menetelmillä. In T. Rättilä & P. Honkatukia (Eds.), Tutkien ja tarinoiden kohti pakolaistaustaisten nuorten kestävää hyvinvointia, 231, 144. Nuorisotutkimusverkosto & Nuorisotutkimusseura, julkaisuja. (In Finnish).
  67. Ritter, E., & Dauksta, D. (2006). Ancient values and contemporary interpretations of European forest culture—Reconsidering the understanding of sustainability in forestry. In Proceedings of the IUFRO conference on small-scale forestry and rural development, June 2006, Galway, Ireland (pp. 424432).
  68. Ritter, E., & Dauksta, D. (2013). Human–forest relationships: ancient values in modern perspectives. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(3), 645662. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-012-9398-9
  69. Robson, J. P., Wilson, S. J., Sanchez, C. M., & Bhatt, A. (2020). Youth and the future of community forestry. Land, 9(11), 406. DOI: 10.3390/land9110406
  70. Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In M. J. Rosenberg & C. I. Hovland (Eds.), Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components (pp. 114). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  71. Saarikoski, H., Tikkanen, J., & Leskinen, L. A. (2010). Public participation in practice—Assessing public participation in the preparation of regional forest programs in Northern Finland. Forest policy and economics, 12(5), 349356. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.006
  72. Schuttler, S. G., Sorensen, A. E., Jordan, R. C., Cooper, C., & Shwartz, A. (2018). Bridging the nature gap: Can citizen science reverse the extinction of experience? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(7), 405411. DOI: 10.1002/fee.1826
  73. Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention—Behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 136. DOI: 10.1080/14792772143000003
  74. Taylor, P. G. (2007). Press pause: Critically contextualizing music video in visual culture and art education. Studies in Art Education, 48(3), 230246. DOI: 10.1080/00393541.2007.11650103
  75. Trott, C. D., Even, T. L., & Frame, S. M. (2020). Merging the arts and sciences for collaborative sustainability action: A methodological framework. Sustainability Science, 15(4), 10671085. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00798-7
  76. Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), 23. DOI: 10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
  77. van Hooft, E. A., Born, M. P., Taris, T. W., van der Flier, H., & Blonk, R. W. (2005). Bridging the gap between intentions and behavior: Implementation intentions, action control, and procrastination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(2), 238256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2004.10.003
  78. Walker, R., Clary, R., Jones, J., & Carlton, C. (2016). Rocking out science!: Using music videos to engage students and assess science learning. Science Scope, 40(3), 6671. DOI: 10.2505/4/ss16_040_03_66
  79. Watson, M., & Barton, G. (2020). Using arts-based methods and reflection to support postgraduate international students’ wellbeing and employability through challenging times. Journal of International Students, 10(S2), 101118. DOI: 10.32674/jis.v10iS2.2849
  80. Yunita, S. A., Soraya, E., & Maryudi, A. (2018). “We are just cheerleaders”: Youth’s views on their participation in international forest-related decision-making fora. Forest Policy and Economics, 88, 5258. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.012
  81. Zurba, M., & Trimble, M. (2014). Youth as the inheritors of collaboration: Crises and factors that influence participation of the next generation in natural resource management. Environmental Science & Policy, 42, 7887. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.05.009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/rl.69 | Journal eISSN: 2002-0104
Language: English
Page range: 4 - 4
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2020
Accepted on: Oct 12, 2021
Published on: Oct 28, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Teppo Hujala, Samuli Junttila, Nina Tokola, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.