Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Corporative Food Regime and Mexican Small Scale Agricultural Production Case Study: Tonatico, Estado De México Cover

The Corporative Food Regime and Mexican Small Scale Agricultural Production Case Study: Tonatico, Estado De México

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2016

Figures & Tables

Table 1

Interviewed maize campesinos (approximated ages and all names are changed).

CampesinoHectaresProductAge
Agustina1maize50
Leonel1maize50
Benito1maize30
Fidel1maize50
Juan2maize25
Federico2maize90
Soledad3maize45
Carlos3maize55
Guillermo3maize45
Enrique5maize45
Marco6maize80
Héctor8maize70
Humberto50 (rent 46)maize55
Ricardo1.4strawberries45
Rodolfo4greenhouse tomatoes55
Cristobal1greenhouse tomatoes30
Armando8onion55
Alberto4onion40
Table 2

Use of agrochemicals and improved seeds, percentage of the cultivated area (Censo Agrícola, Ganadero y Forestal, INEGI, 2007).

Mexico (national level)Tonatico (local level)
Chemical fertilizers26%61%
Improved seeds14%47%
Chemical herbicides17%53%
Figure 1

El Llano de Solidaridad, September 2010, Foto: Malin Jönsson.

Table 3

Maize cultivation (data average from the interviews, harvest 2010).

Output ton/haExpenses pesos/haProducer price paid, pesos/tonProducer price paid, pesos/haIncome, pesos/ha
516 0002 50012 500–3 500
1016 0002 50025 00011 000
Table 4

Maize cultivation (SAGARPA, harvest 2010).

Output ton/haExpenses pesos/haProducer price paid, pesos/tonProducer price paid, pesos/haIncome, pesos/ha
2.3616 0003 5005 9008 260
Language: English
Page range: 84 - 95
Published on: Dec 20, 2016
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Malin Jönsson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.