
Unjust Winds of Change: The Politics and Narratives of Wind Farms in the Brazilian Northeast
By: Veronica Olofsson and Azucena Castro
References
- ABEEólica. 2020. Associação Brasiliera de Energia Eólica. Brazilian Wind Energy Assosiation. Report available at:
http://abeeolica.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/EN_Boletim-Anual-de-Gera%C3%A7%C3%A3o_2020_compressed.pdf . - Avila, S. 2018. Environmental justice and the expanding geography of wind power conflicts. Sustainability Science, 13(3): 599–616. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0547-4
- Bengtsson, M. 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2: 8–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
- Berkhout, F, Marcotullio, PJ and Hanaoka, T. 2012. Understanding energy transitions. Sustainability Science, 7(2): 109–111. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-012-0173-5
- Bjärstig, T, Mancheva, I, Zachrisson, A, Neumann, W and Svensson, J. 2022. Is large-scale wind power a problem, solution, or victim? A frame analysis of the debate in Swedish media. Energy Research & Social Science, 83: 102337. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102337
- Brannstrom, C, Gorayeb, A, De Sousa Mendes, J, Loureiro, CV, De Andrade Meireles, AJ, Da Silva, EV, De Freitas, ALR and De Oliveira, RF. 2017. Is Brazilian wind power development sustainable? Insights from a review of conflicts in Ceará state. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67: 62–71. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.047
- Brannstrom, C, Gorayeb, A, De Souza, WF, Leite, NS, De Oliveira, LNL, Guimarães, R and G, DRF. 2018. Perspectivas geográficas nas transformações do litoral brasileiro pela energia eólica. Revista Brasileira De Geografia, 63(1): 3–28. DOI: 10.21579/issn.2526-0375_2018_n1_p3-28
- Bratman, EZ. 2014. Passive revolution in the green economy: activism and the Belo Monte dam. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15(1): 61–77. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-014-9268-z
- Brown, KB. 2011. Wind power in northeastern Brazil: Local burdens, regional benefits and growing opposition. Climate and Development, 3(4): 344–360. DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2011.628120
- Bryman, A. 2012.
‘Social Research Methods’ . Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fourth Edition. - Carvalho, GO. 2006. Environmental resistance and the politics of energy development in the Brazilian Amazon. The Journal of Environment & Development, 15(3): 245–268. DOI: 10.1177/1070496506291575
- Da Silva Soito, JL and De Freitas, MAV. 2011. Amazon and the expansion of hydropower in Brazil: Vulnerability, impacts and possibilities for adaptation to global climate change. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6): 3165–3177. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.006
- Dalla Fontana, M, Moreira, F, Di Giulio, G and Malheiros, T. 2020. ‘The water-energy- food nexus research in the Brazilian context: What are we missing?’. Environmental Science & Policy, 112: 172–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.021
- de Andrade Meireles, AJ, Gorayeb, A, Da Silva, DRF and De Lima, GS. 2013. Socio-environmental impacts of wind farms on the traditional communities of the western coast of Ceará, in the Brazilian Northeast. Journal of Coastal Research, 65: 81–86. DOI: 10.2112/si65-015.1
- Delapedra-Silva, VA, Ferreira, PV, Cunha, J and Kimura, H. 2021. Economic evaluation of wind power projects in a mix of free and regulated market environments in Brazil. Energies, 14(11): 3325. DOI: 10.3390/en14113325
- de Jong, P, Kiperstok, A, Sánchez, AS, Dargaville, R and Torres, EA. 2016. Integrating large scale wind power into the electricity grid in the Northeast of Brazil. Energy, 100: 401–415. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.026
- de Oliveira, G, Araújo, MB, Rangel, TF, Alagador, D and Diniz-Filho, J. a. F. 2012. Conserving the Brazilian semiarid (Caatinga) biome under climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(11): 2913–2926. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0346-7
- Deranger, ET, Sinclair, RK, Gray, B, McGregor, D and Gobby, J. 2022. Decolonizing Climate Research and Policy: making space to tell our own stories, in our own ways. Community Development Journal, 57(1): 52–73. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsab050
- Djerf-Pierre, M, Cokley, J and Kuchel, L. 2015. Framing Renewable Energy: A comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environmental Communication-a Journal of Nature and Culture, 10(5): 634–655. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542
- EPE. 2020. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Brazilian Energy Research Office. Available at:
https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-en/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-217/SUMMARY%20REPORT%202020.pdf . - Fontana, M, De Araújo Moreira, F, Di Giulio, GM and Malheiros, TF. 2020. The water-energy-food nexus research in the Brazilian context: What are we missing? Environmental Science & Policy, 112: 172–180. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.021
- Frate, CA, Brannstrom, C, De Morais, MVG and Caldeira-Pires, A. 2019. Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Energy Policy, 132: 185–195. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.027
- Gorayeb, A, Brannstrom, C, De Andrade Meireles, AJ and De Sousa Mendes, J. 2018. Wind power gone bad: Critiquing wind power planning processes in northeastern Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, 40: 82–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.027
- Grecchi, RC, Gwyn, QHJ, Bénié, G, Formaggio, AR and Fahl, F. 2014. Land use and land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado: A multidisciplinary approach to assess the impacts of agricultural expansion. Applied Geography, 55: 300–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.014
- Kircherr, J, Pohlner, H and Charles, K. 2016. ‘Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta- synthesis of the research on social impacts of dams’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 60: 115–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.007
- Lichterman, P and Céfaï, D. 2009. The idea of political culture. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 392–414). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0021
- Luiz, CHP and Steinke, VA. 2022. Recent environmental legislation in Brazil and the impact on Cerrado deforestation rates. Sustainability, 14(13): 8096. DOI: 10.3390/su14138096
- Magnani, N, Carrosio, G. 2021.
Understanding the energy transition – Civil society, territory and inequality in Italy . Palgrave McMillan. Published by Springer Nature, Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83481-4 - Martin-Ortega, J, Mesa-Jurado, M, Pineda-Vazquez, M and Novo, P. 2022. Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches. 26 pages. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926
- Mayer, A, Castro-Díaz, L, López, MC, Leturcq, G and Morán, EF. 2021. Is hydropower worth it? Exploring amazonian resettlement, human development and environmental costs with the Belo Monte project in Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, 78: 102129. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102129
- Milanez, B and Santos, RSPD. 2015. Topsy-Turvy Neo-Developmentalism: An analysis of the current Brazilian model of development. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 53: 12–28. DOI: 10.7440/res53.2015.01
- Mino, T and Kudo, S. 2020.
Framing Sustainability Science . Singapore: Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9061-6 - Mogalakwe, M. 2009. The Documentary Research Method – using documentary sources in social research. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 25(1): 43–58. DOI: 10.1353/eas.0.0006
- Obermeister, N. 2018. Local knowledge, global ambitions: IPBES and the advent of multi-scale models and scenarios. Sustainability Science, 14(3): 843–856. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0616-8
- Pelicice, FM and Castello, L. 2021. A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 31(5): 1221–1229. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3565
- Polletta, F and Ho, M. 2009. Frames and their consequences. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 187–209). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0010
- Ribeiro, AED, Arouca, MC and Coelho, DM. 2016. Electric energy generation from small-scale solar and wind power in Brazil: The influence of location, area and shape. Renewable Energy, 85: 554–563. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.071
- Rockström, J, Steffen, W, Noone, KJ, Persson, Å, Chapin, FS, Lambin, ÉF, Lenton, TM, Scheffer, M, Folke, C, Schellnhuber, HJ, Nykvist, B, De Wit, CA, Hughes, TP, Van Der Leeuw, S, Rodhe, H, Sörlin, S, Snyder, PK, Costanza, R, Svedin, U, … Foley, JA. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263): 472–475. DOI: 10.1038/461472a
- Santos, RRO, De Santana Padilha Neto, A, Gondim, JP, Santos, JMD and Conti, IL. 2019. The struggles of traditional communities in land and territory in the Brazilian Semiarid. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science. DOI: 10.22161/ijaers.6.5.13
- Souza Júnior, C, Koch, H, Siegmund-Schultze, M and Köppel, J. 2019. ‘An exploratory scenario analysis of strategic pathways towards a sustainable electricity system of the drought-stricken São Francisco River Basin’. In Energy Systems (2021) 12: 563–602. DOI: 10.1007/s12667-019-00343-1
- Sovacool, B, Hess, D, Cantoni, R, Lee, D, Claire Brisbois, M, Jakob Walnum, H, Freng Dale, R, Johnsen Rygg, B, Korsnes, M, Goswami, A, Kedia, S and Goel, S. 2022. ‘Conflicted transitions: Exploring the actors, tactics, and outcomes of social opposition against energy infrastructure’. In Global Environmental Change, 73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102473
- Teixeira, LP, Lughadha, EN, Da Silva, MVC and Moro, MF. 2021. How much of the Caatinga is legally protected? An analysis of temporal and geographical coverage of protected areas in the Brazilian semiarid region. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 35(3): 473–485. DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062020abb0492
- Traldi, M. 2021. ‘Accumulation by dispossession and green grabbing: wind farms, lease agreements, land appropriation in the Brazilian semiarid’. In Ambiente & Sociedade, 24. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200052r2vu2021L4TD
- Turkovska, O, Castro, GM, Klingler, M, Nitsch, F, Regner, P, Soterroni, AC and Schmidt, J. 2021. Land-use impacts of Brazilian wind power expansion. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2): 024010. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd12f
- Udemba, EN and Tosun, M. 2022. Energy transition and diversification: A pathway to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Brazil. Energy, 239: 122199. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122199
- Weisbrot, M, Johnston, J and Lefebvre, S. 2014. The Brazilian economy in transition: macroeconomic policy, labor and inequality. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
http://cepr.net/documents/publications/brazil-2014-09.pdf - Wolsink, M. 2020. ‘Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary’. Energies, 13(11). DOI: 10.3390/en13112871
- Yashar, DJ. 2005.
Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511790966
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/iberoamericana.638 | Journal eISSN: 2002-4509
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 75
Submitted on: Oct 30, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 26, 2024
Published on: Apr 29, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
© 2024 Veronica Olofsson, Azucena Castro, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.