Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unjust Winds of Change: The Politics and Narratives of Wind Farms in the Brazilian Northeast Cover

Unjust Winds of Change: The Politics and Narratives of Wind Farms in the Brazilian Northeast

Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. ABEEólica. 2020. Associação Brasiliera de Energia Eólica. Brazilian Wind Energy Assosiation. Report available at: http://abeeolica.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/EN_Boletim-Anual-de-Gera%C3%A7%C3%A3o_2020_compressed.pdf.
  2. Avila, S. 2018. Environmental justice and the expanding geography of wind power conflicts. Sustainability Science, 13(3): 599616. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0547-4
  3. Bengtsson, M. 2016. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2: 814. DOI: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
  4. Berkhout, F, Marcotullio, PJ and Hanaoka, T. 2012. Understanding energy transitions. Sustainability Science, 7(2): 109111. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-012-0173-5
  5. Bjärstig, T, Mancheva, I, Zachrisson, A, Neumann, W and Svensson, J. 2022. Is large-scale wind power a problem, solution, or victim? A frame analysis of the debate in Swedish media. Energy Research & Social Science, 83: 102337. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102337
  6. Brannstrom, C, Gorayeb, A, De Sousa Mendes, J, Loureiro, CV, De Andrade Meireles, AJ, Da Silva, EV, De Freitas, ALR and De Oliveira, RF. 2017. Is Brazilian wind power development sustainable? Insights from a review of conflicts in Ceará state. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67: 6271. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.047
  7. Brannstrom, C, Gorayeb, A, De Souza, WF, Leite, NS, De Oliveira, LNL, Guimarães, R and G, DRF. 2018. Perspectivas geográficas nas transformações do litoral brasileiro pela energia eólica. Revista Brasileira De Geografia, 63(1): 328. DOI: 10.21579/issn.2526-0375_2018_n1_p3-28
  8. Bratman, EZ. 2014. Passive revolution in the green economy: activism and the Belo Monte dam. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15(1): 6177. DOI: 10.1007/s10784-014-9268-z
  9. Brown, KB. 2011. Wind power in northeastern Brazil: Local burdens, regional benefits and growing opposition. Climate and Development, 3(4): 344360. DOI: 10.1080/17565529.2011.628120
  10. Bryman, A. 2012. ‘Social Research Methods’. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fourth Edition.
  11. Carvalho, GO. 2006. Environmental resistance and the politics of energy development in the Brazilian Amazon. The Journal of Environment & Development, 15(3): 245268. DOI: 10.1177/1070496506291575
  12. Da Silva Soito, JL and De Freitas, MAV. 2011. Amazon and the expansion of hydropower in Brazil: Vulnerability, impacts and possibilities for adaptation to global climate change. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(6): 31653177. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.006
  13. Dalla Fontana, M, Moreira, F, Di Giulio, G and Malheiros, T. 2020. ‘The water-energy- food nexus research in the Brazilian context: What are we missing?’. Environmental Science & Policy, 112: 172180. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.021
  14. de Andrade Meireles, AJ, Gorayeb, A, Da Silva, DRF and De Lima, GS. 2013. Socio-environmental impacts of wind farms on the traditional communities of the western coast of Ceará, in the Brazilian Northeast. Journal of Coastal Research, 65: 8186. DOI: 10.2112/si65-015.1
  15. Delapedra-Silva, VA, Ferreira, PV, Cunha, J and Kimura, H. 2021. Economic evaluation of wind power projects in a mix of free and regulated market environments in Brazil. Energies, 14(11): 3325. DOI: 10.3390/en14113325
  16. de Jong, P, Kiperstok, A, Sánchez, AS, Dargaville, R and Torres, EA. 2016. Integrating large scale wind power into the electricity grid in the Northeast of Brazil. Energy, 100: 401415. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.026
  17. de Oliveira, G, Araújo, MB, Rangel, TF, Alagador, D and Diniz-Filho, J. a. F. 2012. Conserving the Brazilian semiarid (Caatinga) biome under climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21(11): 29132926. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-012-0346-7
  18. Deranger, ET, Sinclair, RK, Gray, B, McGregor, D and Gobby, J. 2022. Decolonizing Climate Research and Policy: making space to tell our own stories, in our own ways. Community Development Journal, 57(1): 5273. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsab050
  19. Djerf-Pierre, M, Cokley, J and Kuchel, L. 2015. Framing Renewable Energy: A comparative study of newspapers in Australia and Sweden. Environmental Communication-a Journal of Nature and Culture, 10(5): 634655. DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2015.1056542
  20. EPE. 2020. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Brazilian Energy Research Office. Available at: https://www.epe.gov.br/sites-en/publicacoes-dados-abertos/publicacoes/PublicacoesArquivos/publicacao-217/SUMMARY%20REPORT%202020.pdf.
  21. Fontana, M, De Araújo Moreira, F, Di Giulio, GM and Malheiros, TF. 2020. The water-energy-food nexus research in the Brazilian context: What are we missing? Environmental Science & Policy, 112: 172180. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.021
  22. Frate, CA, Brannstrom, C, De Morais, MVG and Caldeira-Pires, A. 2019. Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Energy Policy, 132: 185195. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.027
  23. Gorayeb, A, Brannstrom, C, De Andrade Meireles, AJ and De Sousa Mendes, J. 2018. Wind power gone bad: Critiquing wind power planning processes in northeastern Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, 40: 8288. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.027
  24. Grecchi, RC, Gwyn, QHJ, Bénié, G, Formaggio, AR and Fahl, F. 2014. Land use and land cover changes in the Brazilian Cerrado: A multidisciplinary approach to assess the impacts of agricultural expansion. Applied Geography, 55: 300312. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.014
  25. Kircherr, J, Pohlner, H and Charles, K. 2016. ‘Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta- synthesis of the research on social impacts of dams’. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 60: 115125. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.007
  26. Lichterman, P and Céfaï, D. 2009. The idea of political culture. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 392414). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0021
  27. Luiz, CHP and Steinke, VA. 2022. Recent environmental legislation in Brazil and the impact on Cerrado deforestation rates. Sustainability, 14(13): 8096. DOI: 10.3390/su14138096
  28. Magnani, N, Carrosio, G. 2021. Understanding the energy transition – Civil society, territory and inequality in Italy. Palgrave McMillan. Published by Springer Nature, Switzerland. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-83481-4
  29. Martin-Ortega, J, Mesa-Jurado, M, Pineda-Vazquez, M and Novo, P. 2022. Nature commodification: ‘a necessary evil’? An analysis of the views of environmental professionals on ecosystem services-based approaches. 26 pages. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100926
  30. Mayer, A, Castro-Díaz, L, López, MC, Leturcq, G and Morán, EF. 2021. Is hydropower worth it? Exploring amazonian resettlement, human development and environmental costs with the Belo Monte project in Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, 78: 102129. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102129
  31. Milanez, B and Santos, RSPD. 2015. Topsy-Turvy Neo-Developmentalism: An analysis of the current Brazilian model of development. Revista De Estudios Sociales, 53: 1228. DOI: 10.7440/res53.2015.01
  32. Mino, T and Kudo, S. 2020. Framing Sustainability Science. Singapore: Springer Singapore. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9061-6
  33. Mogalakwe, M. 2009. The Documentary Research Method – using documentary sources in social research. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review, 25(1): 4358. DOI: 10.1353/eas.0.0006
  34. Obermeister, N. 2018. Local knowledge, global ambitions: IPBES and the advent of multi-scale models and scenarios. Sustainability Science, 14(3): 843856. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-018-0616-8
  35. Pelicice, FM and Castello, L. 2021. A political tsunami hits Amazon conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 31(5): 12211229. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.3565
  36. Polletta, F and Ho, M. 2009. Frames and their consequences. In Oxford University Press eBooks (pp. 187209). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0010
  37. Ribeiro, AED, Arouca, MC and Coelho, DM. 2016. Electric energy generation from small-scale solar and wind power in Brazil: The influence of location, area and shape. Renewable Energy, 85: 554563. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.071
  38. Rockström, J, Steffen, W, Noone, KJ, Persson, Å, Chapin, FS, Lambin, ÉF, Lenton, TM, Scheffer, M, Folke, C, Schellnhuber, HJ, Nykvist, B, De Wit, CA, Hughes, TP, Van Der Leeuw, S, Rodhe, H, Sörlin, S, Snyder, PK, Costanza, R, Svedin, U, … Foley, JA. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263): 472475. DOI: 10.1038/461472a
  39. Santos, RRO, De Santana Padilha Neto, A, Gondim, JP, Santos, JMD and Conti, IL. 2019. The struggles of traditional communities in land and territory in the Brazilian Semiarid. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science. DOI: 10.22161/ijaers.6.5.13
  40. Souza Júnior, C, Koch, H, Siegmund-Schultze, M and Köppel, J. 2019. ‘An exploratory scenario analysis of strategic pathways towards a sustainable electricity system of the drought-stricken São Francisco River Basin’. In Energy Systems (2021) 12: 563602. DOI: 10.1007/s12667-019-00343-1
  41. Sovacool, B, Hess, D, Cantoni, R, Lee, D, Claire Brisbois, M, Jakob Walnum, H, Freng Dale, R, Johnsen Rygg, B, Korsnes, M, Goswami, A, Kedia, S and Goel, S. 2022. ‘Conflicted transitions: Exploring the actors, tactics, and outcomes of social opposition against energy infrastructure’. In Global Environmental Change, 73. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102473
  42. Teixeira, LP, Lughadha, EN, Da Silva, MVC and Moro, MF. 2021. How much of the Caatinga is legally protected? An analysis of temporal and geographical coverage of protected areas in the Brazilian semiarid region. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 35(3): 473485. DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062020abb0492
  43. Traldi, M. 2021. ‘Accumulation by dispossession and green grabbing: wind farms, lease agreements, land appropriation in the Brazilian semiarid’. In Ambiente & Sociedade, 24. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422asoc20200052r2vu2021L4TD
  44. Turkovska, O, Castro, GM, Klingler, M, Nitsch, F, Regner, P, Soterroni, AC and Schmidt, J. 2021. Land-use impacts of Brazilian wind power expansion. Environmental Research Letters, 16(2): 024010. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abd12f
  45. Udemba, EN and Tosun, M. 2022. Energy transition and diversification: A pathway to achieve sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Brazil. Energy, 239: 122199. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.122199
  46. Weisbrot, M, Johnston, J and Lefebvre, S. 2014. The Brazilian economy in transition: macroeconomic policy, labor and inequality. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. http://cepr.net/documents/publications/brazil-2014-09.pdf
  47. Wolsink, M. 2020. ‘Framing in Renewable Energy Policies: A Glossary’. Energies, 13(11). DOI: 10.3390/en13112871
  48. Yashar, DJ. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511790966
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 75
Submitted on: Oct 30, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 26, 2024
Published on: Apr 29, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Veronica Olofsson, Azucena Castro, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.