Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Framing the intersectional representation of the Landless Workers’ Movement on Instagram Cover

Framing the intersectional representation of the Landless Workers’ Movement on Instagram

Open Access
|Jul 2024

References

  1. Amaral, P. 2018. Questão de gênero e MST: Os coletivos de auto-organização das mulheres no Espírito Santo [pdf]. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Available at https://repositorio.ufes.br/bitstream/10/10857/1/tese_12520_Maisa%20Prates%20do%20Amaral.pdf [Last accessed January 3, 2024].
  2. Bastos, PN. 2018. Desafios políticos e dialógicos ao projeto de reforma agrária popular do Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra. Revista Epitic, 20(1): 220235.
  3. Benford, R and Snow, D. 2000. Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1): 611639. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
  4. Bernstein, H. 2014. Food Sovereignty via the ‘peasant way: A Sceptical View. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6): 10311063. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2013.852082
  5. Biesecker, A and Hofmeister, S. 2010. Focus: (Re)productivity Sustainable relations both between Society and Nature and between the Genders. Ecological Economics, 69(8): 17031711. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025
  6. Bilge, S. 2013. Intersectionality Undone. Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies. Du Bois Review, 10(2): 405424. DOI: 10.1017/S1742058X13000283
  7. Caldeira, R. 2009. The Failed Marriage Between Women and the Landless People’s Movement in Brazil. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 10(4): p. 237.
  8. Castells, M. 2009. The Power of Identity (Vol. 2, The information age). Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781444318234
  9. Davis, AY. 2016. Freedom is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
  10. Edelman, M, Weis, T, Baviskar, A, Borras, S, Holt-Giménez, E, Kandiyoti, D and Wolford, W. 2014. Introduction: Critical Perspectives on Food Sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(6): 911931. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2014.963568
  11. FAO. 2020. World Food and Agriculture – Statistical Yearbook 2020. Rome: FAO. DOI: 10.4060/cb1329en
  12. Gamson, W, Croteau, D, Hoynes, W and Sasson, T. 1992. Media Images and the Social Construction of Reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18(1): 373393. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.002105
  13. Giménez, ME. 2018. Marx, Women, and Capitalist Social Reproduction. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004291560
  14. Guittar, S and Guittar, N. 2015. Intersectionality. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Second ed., Vol. 12, pp. 657662). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32202-4
  15. Hancock, A. 2007. When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1): 6379. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592707070065
  16. Heery, E. 2018. Fusion or Replacement? Labour and the ‘New’ Social Movements. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 39(4): 661680. DOI: 10.1177/0143831X18777616
  17. Hendlin, Y. 2018. Environmental Justice as a (Potentially) Hegemonic Concept: A Historical Look at Competing Interests between the MST And Indigenous People in Brazil. Local Environment, 24(2): 113128. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2018.1488823
  18. Hernandez, A. 2020. The Emergence of Agroecology as a Political Tool in the Brazilian Landless Movement. Local Environment, 25(3): 205227. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1722990
  19. Hutchby, I. 2001. Technologies, Texts and Affordances, Sociology 35(2): 441456. DOI: 10.1177/S0038038501000219
  20. Jepson, W. 2006. Private Agricultural Colonization on a Brazilian Frontier, 1970–1980. Journal of Historical Geography, 32(4): 839863. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2004.12.019
  21. Kelly, J. 1998. Rethinking Industrial Relations: Mobilization, Collectivism and Long Waves. London: Routledge.
  22. Laclau, E and Mouffe, C. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
  23. Mariano, A and Paz, T. 2018. Diversidade Sexual e de Gênero no MST. In: L. Nogueira, E. Hilario, T. T. Paz and K. Marro, (eds.), 2018. Hasteemos a Bandeira Colorida. Diversidade Sexual e de Gênero no Brasil. São Paulo: Expressão Popular. pp. 289313.
  24. Mattoni, A. 2013. Repertoires of communication in social movement processes. In: B. Cammaerts, A. Mattoni and P. McCurdy, (eds.), 2013. Mediation and protest movements. Bristol: Intellect. pp. 3956. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv36xw3km.6
  25. McGarry, A, Erhart, I, Korkut, U, Eslen-Ziya, H and Jenzen, O. 2019. The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9789048544509
  26. Meek, D. 2014. Agroecology and Radical Grassroots Movements’ Evolving Moral Economies. Environment and Society, 5(1): 4765. DOI: 10.3167/ares.2014.050104
  27. Miranda, E. 2021. STJ garante permanência de famílias em Projeto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável no RJ. Available at https://www.brasildefato.com.br/2021/09/09/stj-garante-permanencia-de-familias-em-projeto-de-desenvolvimento-sustentavel-no-rj [Last accessed September 13, 2022].
  28. Moeckli, J and Braun, B. 2001. Gendered Natures: Feminism, Politics, and Social Nature. In N. Castree and B. Braun, (eds.), 2001. Social Nature: Theory, Practice and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell. pp. 112132.
  29. Mohanty, C. 2013. Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 38(4): 967991. DOI: 10.1086/669576
  30. MST. n/d. Brigadas Internacionalistas. Available at: https://mst.org.br/brigadas-internacionalistas/ [Last accessed Friday 28, 2024].
  31. Oliveira, G and Negra, R. 2022. Malcom X: a visão revolucionária do antirracismo radical. Available at https://mst.org.br/2022/02/21/malcom-x-a-visao-revolucionaria-do-antirracismo-radical-2/ [Last accessed September 13, 2022].
  32. Price, K. 2018. Queering Reproductive Justice in the Trump Era: A Note on Political Intersectionality. Politics and Gender, 14(4): 581601. DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X18000776
  33. Reed, J. 2019. In Pursuit of Social Justice at the Postmodern Turn: Intersectional Activism through the Lens of the Ecosexual Movement. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  34. Rubbo, DIA. 2012. Do campo para o mundo: em busca de um internacionalismo continental para o MST – Entrevista com Gilmar Mauro. Lutas Sociais, 20: 2130.
  35. Safaian, D and Teune, S. 2021. Visual Framing in the German Movements for Gay Liberation and against Nuclear Energy. Visual Studies (Abingdon, England), Ahead-of-print (Ahead-of-print), pp. 112. DOI: 10.1080/1472586X.2021.1940265
  36. Salem, S. 2018. Intersectionality and its Discontents: Intersectionality as Traveling Theory. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(4): 403418. DOI: 10.1177/1350506816643999
  37. Snow, D. 2013. Framing and Social Movements. In D. A. Snow, D. della Porta, B. Klandermans and D. McAdam, (eds.), 2013. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 410476. DOI: 10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm434
  38. Snow, D, Rochford, E, Worden, S and Benford, R. 1986. Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation. American Sociological Review. 51(5): p. 464. DOI: 10.2307/2095581
  39. Souza, R. 2017. Terra, Raça e Classe: A classe trabalhadora é negra. Available at https://mst.org.br/2017/11/27/terra-raca-e-classe-a-classe-trabalhadora-e-negra/ [Last accessed September 13, 2022].
  40. Tarlau, R. 2018. Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism/The Making of Resistance: Brazil’s Landless Movement and Narrative Enactment. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(2): 427433. DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2018.1543007
  41. Vardeman-Winter, J, Jiang, H and Tindall, N. 2013. Information-Seeking Outcomes of Representational, Structural, and Political Intersectionality Among Health Media Consumers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(4): 389411. DOI: 10.1080/00909882.2013.828360
  42. Vergara-Camus, L. 2014. Land and Freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and Peasant Alternatives to Neoliberalism. London: Zed Books. DOI: 10.5040/9781350220980
  43. Wolford, W. 2010. This Land is Ours Now: Social Mobilization and the Meanings of Land in Brazil. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822391074
Language: English
Page range: 120 - 133
Submitted on: Sep 8, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2024
Published on: Jul 12, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 José G. de Melo, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.