Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Political Economy of Climate Change Mitigation in Argentina, Brazil and Peru Cover

The Political Economy of Climate Change Mitigation in Argentina, Brazil and Peru

By:   
Open Access
|Mar 2024

References

  1. Aguiar, S, Mastrangelo, M, Collazzo, M, Camba Sans, GH, Mosso, CL, Ciufolli, L, Schmidt, M, Vallejos, M, Lang, L, Brassiolo, M, Caceres, D, Lerlinsky, G, Paruelo, JM, Seghezzo, L, Staiano, L, Teixeira, M, Volante, JN and Veron, SR. 2018. ¿Cuál es la situación de la Ley de Bosques en la Región Chaqueña a diez años de su sanción? Revisar su pasado para discutir su futuro. Ecología Austral, 28(2): 400417. DOI: 10.25260/EA.18.28.2.0.677
  2. Alcaniz, I and Gutierrez, R. 2020. Between the Global Commodity Boom and Subnational State Capacities: Payment for Environmental Services to Fight Deforestation in Argentina. Global Environmental Politics, 20(1): 3857. DOI: 10.1162/glep_a_00535
  3. Almeida, MWB. 2004. Direitos à floresta e ambientalismo: seringueiros e suas lutas. RBCS, 19(55): 3353. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-69092004000200003
  4. Alvarez, N and Naughton-Treves, L. 2003. Linking national agrarian policy to deforestation in the Peruvian Amazon: a case of Tambopata 1986–1997. AMBIO: a Journal of the Human Environment, 32(4): 269274. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.4.269
  5. Argentina, Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. n.d. Ecorregiones. Available at URL https://www.argentina.gob.ar/interior/ambiente/parquesnacionales/educacionambiental/ecorregiones [last accessed 11 March 2024].
  6. Arancibia, F, Motta, RC and Clausing, P. 2020. The neglected burden of agricultural intensification: a contribution to the debate on land-use change. Journal of Land Use Science, 15(2–3): 235251. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1659431
  7. Baldassini, P, Bagnato, CE and Paruelo, JM. 2020. How may deforestation rates and political instruments affect land use patterns and Carbon emissions in the semi-arid Chaco, Argentina? Land Use Policy, 99. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104985
  8. Becker, B. 2001. Revisão das políticas de ocupação da Amazônia: é possível identificar modelos para projetar cenários? Parcerias Estratégicas, 6(12): 135159.
  9. Bennett, A, Ravikumar, A and Paltan, R. 2018. The Political Ecology of Oil Palm Company-Community Partnerships in the Peruvian Amazon: Deforestation Consequences of the Privatization of Rural Development. World Development, 109: 2941. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.001
  10. Brazil, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. n.d. Biomas. Available at URL https://geoftp.ibge.gov.br/informacoes_ambientais/estudos_ambientais/biomas/mapas/biomas_e_sistema_costeiro_marinho_250mil.pdf [last accessed 11 March 2024].
  11. Camba Sans, GH, Aguiar, S, Vallejos, M and Paruelo, JM. 2018. Assessing the effectiveness of a land zoning policy in the Dry Chaco. The Case of Santiago del Estero, Argentina. Land Use Policy, 70: 313321. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.046
  12. Chavez, A and Perz, S. 2012. Adoption of Policy Incentives and Land Use: Lessons from Frontier Agriculture in Southeastern Peru. Human Ecology, 40: 525539. DOI: 10.1007/s10745-012-9494-3
  13. Che Piu, H and Menton, M. 2014. The context of REDD+ in Peru – drivers, agents and institutions. (CIFOR Occasional Paper 106). Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_!iles/OccPapers/OP-106.pdf.
  14. Climate Watch. 2023. Historic GHG emissions, Argentina, Brazil and Peru [Data set]. https://www.climatewatchdata.org/ghg-emissions?breakBy=sector&end_year=2020&regions=ARG%2CBRA%2CPER&start_year=1990.
  15. Cotroneo, SM, Jacobo, EJ and Brassiolo, MM. 2021. Degradation processes and adaptive strategies in communal forests of Argentine dry Chaco. Integrating stakeholder knowledge and perceptions. Ecosystems and People, 17(1): 507522. DOI: 10.1080/26395916.2021.1972042
  16. Dammert, JL. 2019. The growth of oil palm in the Peruvian Amazon: deforestation and land trafficking. In: Chirif, A (ed.), Peru: deforestation in times of climate change (5371). International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs.
  17. De Waroux, YP, Garrett, RD, Heilmayr, R and Lambin, EF. 2016. Land-use policies and corporate investments in agriculture in the Gran Chaco and Chiquitano. PNAS, 113(15): 40214026. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602646113
  18. Faingerch, M, Vallejos, M, Teixeira, M and Mastrangelo, ME. 2021. Land privatization and deforestation in a commodity production frontier. Conservation Letters, 14. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12794
  19. FAOSTAT. 2023. Climate change: agrifood systems emissions, Argentina, Brazil and Peru [Data set]. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data.
  20. Fehlenberg, V, Baumann, M, Gasparri, NI and Piquer-Rodriguez, M. 2017. The role of soybean production as an underlying driver of deforestation in the South American Chaco. Global Environmental Change, 45: 2434. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.05.001
  21. Fernandez Milmanda, B and Garay, C. 2019. Subnational variation in forest protection in the Argentine Chaco. World Development, 118: 7990. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.002
  22. Finer, M and Novoa, S. 2015. MAAP Synthesis #1: Patterns and Drivers of Deforestation in the Peruvian Amazon. Monitoring of the Andean Amazon Project. https://maaproject.org/2015/maap-synthesis1/.
  23. Fountain, A and Huetz-Adams, F. 2022. Cocoa barometer 2022. https://cocoabarometer.org/en/.
  24. Frederico, S. 2013. Agricultura cientí!ica globalizada e fronteira agrícola moderna no Brasil. Confins, Revista franco-brasilera de Geogra!ia, 17. DOI: 10.4000/confins.8153
  25. Garrett, R, Cammelli, F, Ferreira, J, Levy, SA, Valentim, J and Vieira, I. 2021. Forests and Sustainable Development in the Brazilian Amazon: History, Trends, and Future Prospects. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46: 2.12.28. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-010228
  26. Gasparri, NI, Grau, R and Angolese, JG. 2013. Linkages between soybean and neotropical deforestation: Coupling and transient decoupling dynamics in a multi-decadal analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23: 16051614. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.007
  27. Grau, R, Aide, TM and Gasparri, NI. 2005. Globalization and Soybean Expansion into Semiarid Ecosystems of Argentina. Ambio, 34(3). DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.3.265
  28. Graziano Ceddia, M and Zepharovitch, E. 2017. Jevons paradox and the loss of natural habitat in the Argentinean Chaco: the impact of the indigenous communities’ land titling and the Forest Law in the province of Salta. Land Use Policy, 69: 608617. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.044
  29. Gutierrez, R. 2017. La confrontación de coaliciones sociedad-Estado: la política de protección de bosques nativos en Argentina (2004–2015). Revista SAAP, 11(2): 283312.
  30. Hall, P. 2016. Politics as a process structured in space and time. In: Orfeu, F, Rulia, GF and Adam, S (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.2
  31. Hirsch, E. 2017. Investment’s rituals: “Grassroots” extractivism and the making of an indigenous gold mine in the Peruvian Andes. Geoforum, 82: 259267. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.08.012
  32. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC. 2022. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2022: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University, 2022.
  33. International Energy Agency, IEA. 2021. Key World Energy Statistics 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2021.
  34. Lende, SG. 2018. Destruccion de bosques nativos y deforestacion illegal: el caso argentino (1998–2016). Papeles de Geogra!ia, 64: 154180. DOI: 10.6018/geogra!ia/2018/349551
  35. Li, F. 2015. Unearthing conflict: corporate mining, activism and expertise in Peru. Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1515/9780822375869
  36. Loueiro, VR and Pinto, JNA. 2005. A questão fundiária na Amazônia. Estudos Avançados, 19(54): 7798. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.03.015
  37. MAPBIOMAS. 2021. Data on deforestation, by biome. Available at URL https://plataforma.brasil.mapbiomas.org/cobertura?activeBaseMap=9&layersOpacity=100&activeModule=coverage&activeModuleContent=coverage%3Acoverage_main&activeYear=2022&mapPosition=-15.127303%2C-51.419045%2C5&timelineLimitsRange=1985%2C2022&baseParams[territoryType]=1&baseParams[territories]=1%3BBrasil%3B1%3BPa%C3%ADs%3B0%3B0%3B0%3B0&baseParams[activeClassTreeOptionValue]=default&baseParams[activeClassTreeNodeIds]=1%2C7%2C8%2C9%2C10%2C11%2C2%2C12%2C13%2C14%2C15%2C16%2C17%2C3%2C18%2C19%2C28%2C30%2C31%2C32%2C33%2C34%2C29%2C35%2C36%2C37%2C38%2C20%2C21%2C4%2C22%2C23%2C24%2C25%2C5%2C26%2C27%2C6&baseParams[activeSubmodule]=coverage_main&baseParams[yearRange]=1985-2022 [last accessed 11 March 2024].
  38. McClintock, C. 2021. Peru’s cleavages, conflict and precarious democracy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1706
  39. Merino, R and Gustafsson, MT. 2021. Localizing the indigenous environmental steward norm: The making of conservation and territorial rights in Peru. Environmental Science and Policy, 124: 627634. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.005
  40. Monteroso, I, Cronkleton, P, Pinedo, D and Larson, AM. 2017. Reclaiming collective rights: land and forest tenure reforms in Peru (1960–2016). (CIFOR Working Paper 224). Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). DOI: 10.17528/cifor/006426
  41. Nolte, CL, Gobbi, B, de Waroux, YP, Piquer-Rodriguez, M, Butsic, V and Lambin, EF. 2017. Decentralized Land Use Zoning Reduces Large-scale Deforestation in a Major Agricultural Frontier. Ecological Economics, 136: 3040. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.02.009
  42. North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  43. Organization for the Economic Co-operation and Development, OCDE. 2018. OECD Food and Agricultural Reviews, Agricultural Policies in Argentina. Available at URL https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/9789264311695-8-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/9789264311695-8-en [last accessed 11 March 2024].
  44. Pereira, JC and Viola, E. 2022. Climate Change and Biodiversity Governance in the Amazon At the Edge of Ecological Collapse? Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780429296581
  45. Peru, Ministerio del Ambiente. 2019. Mapa Nacional de Ecosistemas del Perú. Available at URL https://sinia.minam.gob.pe/mapas/mapa-nacional-ecosistemas-peru [last accessed 11 March 2024].
  46. Pierson, P. 2016. Power in Historical Institutionalism. In: Orfeu, F, Rulia, GF and Adam, S (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199662814.013.7
  47. Rivero, S, Almeida, O, Avila, S and Oliveira, W. 2009. Pecuária e desmatamento: uma análise das principais causas diretas do desmatamento na Amazônia. Nova Economia, 19(1): 4166. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-63512009000100003
  48. Romero, JE. 2012. Forest conservation in Argentina: early analysis of the forest law implementation in the Chaco ecoregion. [Master thesis, The University of British Columbia]. The University of British Columbia Library, UBC Theses and Dissertations. https://open.library.ubc.ca/media/download/pdf/24/1.0073365/1.
  49. Ryan, D. 2014. Politica y ambiente en la Argentina: un caso de baja politizacion? Analysis de la aprobacion de las leyes de bosques nativos y proteccion de glaciares. Revista Estado y Politicas Públicas, 3: 2232. 271–286. DOI: 10.14288/1.0073365
  50. Ryan, D. 2017. Politics and climate change: exploring the relationship between political parties and climate issues in Latin America. Ambiente & Sociedade, 2: 271286. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4422asocex0007v2032017
  51. Salas Barboza, AG, Pocovi, JMC, Huaranca, LL, Aguero, JL, Iribarnegaray, MA, Escosteguy, M, Volante, JN and Seghezzo, L. 2020. Ten years of contested enforcement of the Forest Law in Salta, Argentina. The role of land change science and political ecology. Journal of Land Use Science, 15(2–3): 221234. DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2019.1646333
  52. Salazar, A, Baldi, G, Hirota, M, Syktus, J and McAlpine, C. 2015. Land use and land cover change impacts on the regional climate of non-Amazonian South America: A review. Global and Planetary Change, 128: 103119. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.02.009
  53. Sanchez-Cuervo, AMS, Lima, LS, Dallmeier, F, Garate, P, Bravo, A and Vanthomme, H. 2020. Twenty Years of Land Cover Change in the Southeastern Peruvian Amazon: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation. Regional Environmental Change, 20(8). DOI: 10.1007/s10113-020-01603-y
  54. Schiling-Vacaflor, A, Flemmer, R and Huiber, A. 2018. Contesting the hydrocarbon frontiers: State depoliticizing practices and local responses in Peru. World Development, 108: 7485. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.03.019
  55. Sistema de Estimativas de Emissões e Remoções de Gases de Efeito Estufa, SEEG. 2023. Brazilian total GHG emissions [Data set]. https://plataforma.seeg.eco.br/total_emission#.
  56. Shanee, N and Shanee, S. 2016. Land Trafficking, Migration, and Conservation in the “No-Man’s Land” of Northern Peru. Tropical Conservation Science, 9(4): 116. DOI: 10.1177/1940082916682957
  57. Steffen, W. 2011. A truly complex and diabolical policy problem. In: John, D, Richard, N and David, S (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2137. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566600.003.0002
  58. Thelen, K and Steinmo, S. 1992. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In: Sven, S, Kathleen, T and Frank, L (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511528125
  59. Trigueiro, WR, Nabout, JC and Tassarollo, G. 2020. Uncovering the spatial variability of recent deforestation drivers in the Brazilian Cerrado. Journal of Environmental Management, 275(12). DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111243
  60. Turzi, M. 2019. The International Political Economy of Soy Agriculture in South America. Oxford: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1658
  61. Viola, E and Franchini, M. 2018. Brazil and climate change beyond the Amazon. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315101651
  62. Volante, J and Seguezzo, L. 2018. Can’t See the Forest for the Trees: Can Declining Deforestation Trends in the Argentinian Chaco Region be Ascribed to Efficient Law Enforcement? Ecological Economics, 146: 408413. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.007
  63. Zak, MR, Cabido, M, Caceres, DM and Diaz, S. 2008. What Drives Accelerated Land Cover Change in Central Argentina? Synergistic Consequences of Climatic, Socioeconomic, and Technological Factors. Environmental Management, 42: 181189. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9101-y
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 19
Submitted on: Aug 8, 2023
Accepted on: Mar 5, 2024
Published on: Mar 18, 2024
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2024 Larissa Basso, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.