Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Urban Shrinkage and Suburbanization in Mexico: A View Based on the Last Census Data Cover

Urban Shrinkage and Suburbanization in Mexico: A View Based on the Last Census Data

Open Access
|Nov 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Thirty-year (1990–2020) demographic variation by municipality in Mexico. Figure author’s own, data source: INEGI.

Figure 2

Variation of shrinking municipalities in Mexico. Figure author’s own, data source: INEGI Censos de Población y vivienda 1990–2020.

Table 1

Shrinking Cities in Mexico 1990–2020. Layout author’s own, data source: INEGI Censos de Población y vivienda 1990–2020.

CityFederal statePopulation (2020)Rate of shrinkage (1990–2020)Possible shrinkage determinantExtreme poverty2Category3
MoroleónGuanajuato47,2611.9%Crisis of the textile industry3.32%1
MinatitlanVeracruz144,76626%Decrease in L. Cardenas refinery operations/ Environmental contamination10.1%1
SalvatierraGuanajuato94,1263.6%Structural trend of migration to US7.07%2
Tamazula de GordianoJalisco38,9557.8%Mechanization of sugar cane cutting (“Tamazula Ingenio” company)2.96%2
Jiquilpan de JuárezMichoacán36,1581.5%Structural trend of migration to US (Aguilar Ortega, 2011)7.16%2
TuxpanNayarit30,06412.3%Tobacco workers migration to US (Madera & Hernández, 2016)4.67%2
Matias Romero AvendanoOaxaca38,1831.5%Decrease in rail system operations17.7%2
TamazunchaleSan Luis Potosi95,0375.2%Contamination by mining22.4%2
Cerro AzulVeracruz25,01111.1%Decrease in oil production8.22%2
Cosamaloapan de CarpioVeracruz54,73728.7%Sugar industry crisis8.45%2
Agua DulceVeracruz44,1046.6%Decrease in oil production7.6%2
MaderaChihuahua25,14429.9%Presence of organized crime activities9.2%3
AcámbaroGuanajuato108,6973.3%Structural trend of migration to US4.8%3
YuririaGuanajuato68,74111%Structural trend of migration to US8.59%3
TeloloapanGuerrero53,8173%Presence of organized crime activities21.4%3
HuetamoMichoacan41,9734.6%Structural trend of migration to US/ Public insecurity17.7%3
PuruandiroMichoacán69,2602.3%Structural trend of migration (Garcia & Delfin, 2012)16.8%3
TepalcatepecMichoacán24,0744.1%Structural trend of migration /Public insecurity9.03%3
Puente de IxtlaMorelos40,0188.9&Natural disaster, earthquake 201818.4%3
Santiago IxcuintlaNayarit93,9815.2%Productive reconversion of tobacco (Madera & Hernández, 2017)5.67%3
TecualaNayarit37,13518.9%Presence of organized crime activities (Meza et al. 2012)4.27%3
Loma BonitaOaxaca40,9342.4%Structural trend of migration to US11.5%3
CardenasSan Luis Potosi38,3173.8%Decrease in rail system operations8.4%3
CerritosSan Luis Potosi22,0752.7%Lack of economic opportunities7.46%3
EscuinapaSinaloa59,98830.3%Public insecurity4.87%3
Benito JuarezSonora21,6920.6%Public insecurity5.1%3
El ManteTamaulipas106,1448.6%Sugar industry crisis3.9%3
San FernandoTamaulipas51,4055.6%Public insecurity12.8%3
Lerdo de TejadaVeracruz19,1236.8%Sugar industry crisis5.03%3
Nochistlán de MejíaZacatecas27,94513.6%Structural trend of migration to US4.96%3
Figure 3

Suburbanization in Mexico, Metropolitan population growth 1990–2020. Figure author’s own, data source: INEGI Censos de Población y vivienda 1990–2020.

Figure 4

Suburbanization in Mexico, Metropolitan population growth trend for decades. Figure author’s own, data source: INEGI Censos de Población y vivienda 1990–2020.

Language: English
Page range: 63 - 74
Submitted on: Mar 26, 2021
Accepted on: Oct 21, 2021
Published on: Nov 11, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Simone Di Pietro, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.