Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Thermal Cameras as a Semiotic Resource for Inquiry in a South African Township School Context Cover

Thermal Cameras as a Semiotic Resource for Inquiry in a South African Township School Context

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2009). A disciplinary discourse perspective on university science learning: Achieving fluency in a critical constellation of modes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 2749. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20265
  2. Airey, J., & Linder, C. (2017). Social semiotics in university physics education. In: Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., & Fischer, H. E. (eds.), Multiple Representations in Physics Education, 95122. Cham: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_5
  3. Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1996). Learning the scientific “story”: A case study in the teaching and learning of elementary thermodynamics. Science Education, 80(3), 249281. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199606)80:3<;249::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
  4. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. R. (2014). Touch: A resource for making meaning. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(2), 7785.
  5. Clark, J., & Linder, C. (2006). Changing teaching, changing times, 8. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
  6. Davidsen, J., & Christiansen, E. T. (2014). Mind the hand: A study on children’s embodied and multimodal collaborative learning around touchscreens. Designs for Learning, 7(1), 3452. DOI: 10.2478/dfl-2014-0010
  7. Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and Assessment Policy Statement (CAPS). Grades 7–9. Natural Sciences. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Basic Education.
  8. Engel Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary students’ conceptions of the conduction of heat: Bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176182. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/309
  9. Erickson, G. L. (1985). Heat and temperature. Part A: An overview of pupils’ ideas. In: Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (eds.), Children’s ideas in science, 5566. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  10. Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., Hedberg, D., & Schönborn, K. J. (2015). Students’ framing of laboratory exercises using infrared cameras. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 11(2). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020127
  11. Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Schönborn, K. J. (2016). Taking on the heat – a narrative account of how infrared cameras invite instant inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(5), 685713. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-015-9476-8
  12. Jaipal, K. (2010). Meaning making through multiple modalities in a biology classroom: A multimodal semiotics discourse analysis. Science Education, 94(1), 4872.
  13. Jewitt, C. (2017). Towards a multimodal social semiotic agenda for touch. In: Zhao, S., Djonov, E., Björkvall, A., & Boeriis, M. (eds.), Advancing multimodal and critical discourse studies, 7993. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315521015-6
  14. Jewitt, C., Kress, G., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Exploring learning through visual, actional and linguistic communication: The multimodal environment of a science classroom. Educational Review, 53(1), 518. DOI: 10.1080/00131910123753
  15. Jones, L. A., & Berris, M. (2002). The psychophysics of temperature perception and thermal-interface design. Paper presented at the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems. 24–25 March 2002, Orlando, FL. DOI: 10.1109/HAPTIC.2002.998951
  16. Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London, UK: Continuum.
  17. Kress, G. R. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London, UK: Routledge.
  18. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  19. Lewis, E. L., & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657677. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660310607
  20. Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B.-S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203806524
  21. Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474496. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20347
  22. Nassaji, H., & Wells, G. (2000). What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’?: An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21(3), 376406. DOI: 10.1093/applin/21.3.376
  23. Ramnarain, U. D. (2014). Teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, 38, 6575. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003
  24. Ramnarain, U. D., & Schuster, D. (2014). The pedagogical orientations of South African physical sciences teachers towards inquiry or direct instructional approaches. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 627650. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-013-9395-5
  25. Rocard, M., Csermely, P., Jorde, D., Lenzen, D., Walberg-Henriksson, H., & Hemmo, V. (2007). Science education now: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe. Retrieved 1 December 2017 from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/report-rocard-on-science-education_en.pdf.
  26. Rosebery, A. S., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. (2010). “The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 322357. DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2010.491752
  27. Schönborn, K. J., Haglund, J., & Xie, C. (2014). Pupils’ early explorations of thermoimaging to interpret heat and temperature. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 118132.
  28. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
  29. Wiser, M., & Amin, T. G. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 331355. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00036-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.96 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 134
Submitted on: Jan 30, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 22, 2018
Published on: Dec 17, 2018
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Gilbert Dolo, Jesper Haglund, Konrad J Schönborn, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.