Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Transformative Approach to Admissions Assessment: The South African Case Cover

A Transformative Approach to Admissions Assessment: The South African Case

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Barton, D. (1994). An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
  2. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local Literacies: Reading and Writing in One Community. London and New York: Routledge.
  3. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, & R. Ivanic (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context (pp. 715). London: Routledge.
  4. Baynham, M. (1995). Literacy Practices. Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts. London and New York: Longman.
  5. Baynham, M., & Baker, D. (2002). ‘Practice’ in literacy and numeracy research: Multiple perspectives. Ways of Knowing, 2(1), 19.
  6. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 774. 10.1080/0969595980050102
  7. Black, P. J. (2001). Testing: Friend or Foe? Theory and Practice of Assessment and Testing. London and New York: Routledge Falmer.
  8. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). “Introduction: Assessment for the longer term.” In Rethinking assessment in higher education, 313. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203964309
  9. Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013). Rethinking models of feedback for learning: The challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(6), 698712. 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
  10. Boughey, C. (2009) Understanding teaching and learning at foundation level: A ‘critical’ imperative? In C. Hutchins, & J. Garraway (Eds.), Beyond the University Gates: Provision of Extended Curriculum Programmes in South Africa (pp. 47). Available at: http://www.cput.ac.za/storage/services/fundani/beyond_the_university_gates.pdf#page=9 (Accessed 24 February 2015).
  11. Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 13151325. 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
  12. Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  13. Earl, A. M. (2003). Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  14. Foxcroft, C. (2006). The nature of benchmark tests. In H. Griesel (Ed.), Access and Entry Level Benchmarks: The National Benchmark Tests Project (pp. 716). Available at: http://www.hesa.org.za/sites/hesa.org.za/files/2006_HESA_AccessandEntryLevel_Benchmarks.pdf (Accessed 24 February 2015).
  15. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, 2nd edition. London: Falmer Press.
  16. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. London: Falmer Press.
  17. Griesel, H. (2006). The context of the national benchmark project. In H. Griesel (Ed.), Access and entry level benchmarks: The national benchmark tests project (pp. 16). Pretoria: Higher Education South Africa.
  18. Hameed, F., & Iqbal, H. M. (2021). Curriculum responsiveness to change: A case of Pakistan’s higher education in the COVID-19 pandemic. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 37(2), 585590. 10.12669/pjms.37.5.4177
  19. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511841057
  20. Kelly, S., Johnston, B., & Baynham, M. (2007). The concept of numeracy as social practice. In S. Kelly, B. Johnston, & K. Yasukawa (Eds.), The Adult Numeracy Handbook: Reframing Adult Numeracy in Australia. Adult Literacy and Numeracy Australian Research Consortium, Sydney University of Technology.
  21. Klemenčič, M. (2023). A theory of student agency in higher education. In C. Baik, & E. R. Kahu (Eds.), Research Handbook on the Student Experience in Higher Education (pp. 2540). Edward Elgar Publishing. 10.4337/9781802204193.00010
  22. Kress, G. (2007). Thinking about meaning and learning in a world of instability and multiplicity. Pedagogies. An International Journal, 1, 1934. 10.1080/15544800701343604
  23. Leibowitz, B., & Bozalek, V. (2014). “Access to higher education in South Africa.” Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 16(1), 91109. 10.5456/WPLL.16.1.91
  24. Letseka, M., & Pitsoe, V. (2014). The challenges and prospects of access to higher education at UNISA. Studies in Higher Education, 39(10), 19421954. 10.1080/03075079.2013.823933
  25. Lillis, T., Harrington, K., Lea, M. R., & Mitchell, S. (2015). Introduction. In T. Lillis, K. Harrington, M. Lea, & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Working with Academic Literacies: Case Studies Toward Transformative Practice (pp. 155162). USA: WAC Clearinghouse/Parlor Press. Available at: http://wac.colos tate.edu/books/lillis/ (Accessed 22 November 2018).
  26. Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 532. 10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
  27. Maringe, F., & Chiramba, O. (2022). “Equity, Access and Success in Higher Education in Times of Disruption: Contemporary and Future Imaginaries”. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(4), 15. 10.20853/36-4-5285
  28. McArthur, J. (2016). “Assessment for Social Justice: The Role of Assessment in Achieving Social Justice.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 967981. 10.1080/02602938.2015.1053429
  29. McArthur, J. (2022). Reflections on Assessment for Social Justice and Assessment for Inclusion. In R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, D. Boud, & T. J. de St Jorre (Eds.), Assessment for Inclusion in Higher Education: Promoting Equity and Social Justice in Assessment (pp. 1929). 10.4324/9781003293101-4
  30. McKenna, S. (2009). Cracking the code of academic literacy: An ideological task. In C. Hutchins, & J. Garraway (Eds.), Beyond the University Gates: Provision of Extended Curriculum Programmes in South Africa (pp. 815). Available at: http://www.cput.ac.za/storage/services/fundani/beyond_the_university_gates.pdf#page=9 (Accessed 24 February 2015).
  31. Moschkovich, J. N. (2015). Academic literacy in mathematics for English learners. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 40, 4362. 10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.01.005
  32. Nicol, D., Thomson, A., & Breslin, C. (2013). Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(1), 102122. 10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
  33. O’Halloran, K. (1999). Towards a systemic functional analysis of multisemiotic mathematics texts. Semiotica, 124(1–2), 130. 10.1515/semi.1999.124.1-2.1
  34. O’Shea, S., & Delahunty, J. (2022). How Do We Assess for “Success”? Challenging Assumptions of Success in the Pursuit of Inclusive Assessment. In R. Ajjawi, J. Tai, D. Boud, & T. J. de St Jorre (Eds.), Assessment for Inclusion in Higher Education: Promoting Equity and Social Justice in Assessment (pp. 167177). 10.4324/9781003293101-19
  35. OECD. (2019). Learning Compass 2030: A conceptual framework. OECD Publishing.
  36. Prince, R. (2016). Predicting Success in Higher Education: The Value of Criterion and Norm-referenced Assessments. Practitioner Research in Higher education, 10(1), 2238.
  37. Prince, R., & Archer, A. (2008). A new literacies approach to academic numeracy practices in higher education in South Africa. Literacy and Numeracy Studies, 16(1), 6375. 10.5130/lns.v16i1.1948
  38. Prince, R., & Simpson, Z. (2016). Quantitative literacy practices in civil engineering study: Designs for teaching and learning. In A.-M. Nortvig, B. H. Sørensen, M. Misfeldt, R. Ørngreen, B. B. Allsopp, B. Henningsen, & H. Hautopp (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Designs for Learning. Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
  39. Prince, R. N., & Archer, A. (2006). Quantitative literacy as situated social practice in higher education. International Journal of Learning, 12(7), 227234. 10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v12i07/47938
  40. Sadler, D. R. (1988). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5, 7784. 10.1080/0969595980050104
  41. Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system. ECNU Review of Education, 1(1), 123. 10.30926/ecnuroe2018010104
  42. Scott, I., Yeld, N., & Hendry, J. (2007). A case for improving teaching and learning in South African higher education. Higher Education Monitor No. 6. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.
  43. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  44. Street, B. (1995a). ‘Academic Literacies’. In D. Baker, J. Clay, & C. Fox (Eds.), Challenging Ways of Knowing in Maths, Science and English. Brighton/Philadelphia: Falmer Press.
  45. Street, B. (1995b). Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education. London and New York: Longman.
  46. Street, B. (2000). Literacy events and literacy practices: Theory and practice in the New Literacy Studies. In M. Martin-Jones & K. Jones (Eds.), Multilingual Literacies: Reading and Writing Different Worlds (pp. 1729). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/swll.10.08str
  47. Street, B. (2005). Applying new literacy studies to numeracy as social practice. In A. Rogers (Ed.), Urban Literacy: Communication, Identity and Learning in Development Contexts. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
  48. Street, B., & Baker, D. (2006). So, what about multimodal numeracies? In K. Pahl, & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Travel Notes from the New Literacy Studies. Multilingual Matters. 10.2307/jj.27195506.14
  49. Telio, S., Ajjawi, R., & Regehr, G. (2015). The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Academic Medicine, 90(5), 609614. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560
  50. Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge. 10.4324/9781351115940
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.232 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 64 - 74
Submitted on: Aug 15, 2024
Accepted on: Sep 24, 2025
Published on: Oct 14, 2025
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Robert Noel Prince, Zach Simpson, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.