Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing Students’ Multimodal Texts in the Subject of English: Synthesising Peers’ and Teachers’ Recognition of Semiotic Work Cover

Assessing Students’ Multimodal Texts in the Subject of English: Synthesising Peers’ and Teachers’ Recognition of Semiotic Work

By:   
Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Aagaard, T., & Lund, A. (2013). Mind the gap: Divergent objects of assessment in technology-rich learning environments. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(4), 225243. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2013-04-04
  2. Aagaard, T., & Silseth, K. (2017). Teachers’ assessment of digital stories: Challenges and dilemmas. Nordic Studies in Education, 37(3–4), 231242. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1891-5949-2017-03-04-08
  3. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1625. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
  4. Archer, A. (2000). Communicative competence expanded: A ‘multiliteracies’ approach to English Additional Language teaching. English Academy Review, 17(1), 8396. DOI: 10.1080/10131750085310101
  5. Archer, A., & Breuer, E. (2015). Methodological and Pedagogical Approaches to Multimodality in Writing. In A. Archer & E. Breuer (Eds.), Multimodality in Writing: The state of the art in theory, methodology and pedagogy (pp. 116). Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004297197_002
  6. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2008). Writing in Multimodal Texts: A Social-Semiotic Account of Designs for Learning. Written Communication, 28, 166195. DOI: 10.1177/0741088307313177
  7. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016). Multimodality, Learning and Communication: A Social-Semiotic Frame. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315687537
  8. Bøhn, H. (2019). Assessing communicative skills. In T. Burner, C. Carlsen & K. Kverndokken (Eds.), 101 Ways to Work with Communicative Skills. Fagbokforlaget.
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  10. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141178. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  11. Campoy-Cubillo, M. C., & Querol-Julián, M. (2015). Assessing multimodal listening. In B. C. Camiciottoli & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching (pp. 193212). Routledge.
  12. Canale, G. (2019). Technology, Multimodality and Learning: Analyzing Meaning across Scales. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-21795-2
  13. Cazden, C., Cope, B., Fairclough, N., Gee, J., Kalantzis, M., Kress, G., … Nakata, M. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 6092. DOI: 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  14. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework for Languages: Learning, Teaching and Assessment. Companion Volume. Council of Europe.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.
  17. Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2019). The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 481509. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3
  18. Erstad, O. (2013). Trajectories of Remixing: Digital Literacies, Media Production and Schooling. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), A New Literacies Reader: Educational Perspectives (pp. 3856). Peter Lang.
  19. Fjørtoft, H. (2020). Multimodal digital classroom assessments. Computers & Education, 152, 103892. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103892
  20. Gilje, Ø. (2021). På nye veier: læremidler og digitale verktøy fra kunnskapsløftet til fagfornyelsen. [Taking new routes: learning materials and digital tools from the knowledge promotion to the subject renewal]. Norsk Pedagogisk Tidsskrift, 2, 227241. DOI: 10.18261/issn.1504-2987-2021-02-10
  21. Gipps, C. (2002). Sociocultural Perspectives on Assessment. In G. Wells and G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for Life in the 21st Century (pp. 7383). Blackwell Publishing. DOI: 10.1002/9780470753545.ch6
  22. Godhe, A. -L. (2014). Creating and Assessing Multimodal Texts – Negotiations at the Boundary. PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg.
  23. Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710
  24. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
  25. Heath, S. B. (1982). Protean shapes in literacy events: Ever-shifting oral and literate traditions. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 91117). Ablex.
  26. Heberle, V. (2010). Multimodal literacy for teenage EFL students. Cadernos de Letras (UFRJ), 27, 101116.
  27. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269293). Penguin.
  28. Jakobsen, I. K. (2019). Inspired by image: A multimodal analysis of 10th grade English school-leaving written examinations set in Norway (2014–2018). Acta Didactica Norge, 13(1). DOI: 10.5617/adno.6248
  29. Jewitt, C. (2003). Re-thinking Assessment: multimodality, literacy and computer-mediated learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 83102. DOI: 10.1080/09695940301698
  30. Jewitt, C. (2008). Multimodality and Literacy in School Classrooms. Review of Research in Education, 32, 241267. February 2008. DOI: 10.3102/0091732X07310586
  31. Jewitt, C. (2011). Changing Pedagogic Landscape of Subject English in UK Classrooms. In K. L. O’Halloran & B. A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains (pp. 184201). Routledge.
  32. Jewitt, C. (2014). An introduction to multimodality. In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis (pp. 1530). Routledge.
  33. Johnson, D., & Kress, G. (2003). Globalisation, Literacy and Society: Redesigning pedagogy and assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(1), 514. DOI: 10.1080/09695940301697
  34. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203299234
  35. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
  36. Kress, G., & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal Literacy (pp. 118). Peter Lang. DOI: 10.1002/9780470760178.ch
  37. Kress, G., & Selander, S. (2012). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 265268. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003
  38. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Hodder Education.
  39. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003099857
  40. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [InterView: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing]. 3rd ed. Gyldendal Akademisk.
  41. Lee, I. (2007). Assessment for Learning: Integrating Assessment, Teaching, and Learning in the ESL/EFL Writing Classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 199213. DOI: 10.3138/cmlr.64.1.199
  42. Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 3450. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003
  43. Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299325. DOI: 10.1177/147035720200100303
  44. Lim, F. V. (2018). Developing a systemic functional approach to teach multimodal literacy. Functional Linguistics, 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40554-018-0066-8
  45. Lim, F. V., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). ‘If you have the freedom, you don’t need to even think hard’ – considerations in designing for student agency through digital multimodal composing in the language classroom. Language and Education, 36. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2022.2107875
  46. Lund, A. (2006). The multiple contexts of online language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 10(2), 181204. DOI: 10.1191/1362168806lr191oa
  47. Magnusson, P., & Godhe, A.-L. (2019). Multimodality in Language Education – Implications for Teaching. Designs for Learning, 11(1), 127137. DOI: 10.16993/dfl.127
  48. Martinec, R., & Salway, A. (2005). A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication, 4(3), 337371. DOI: 10.1177/1470357205055928
  49. Mitsikopoulou, B. (2022). Digital media in foreign language education. Pedio.
  50. Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (www.udir.no) (n.d.) Criteria for attainment of competence aims, English general and vocational studies. https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/lareplanverket/kjennetegn/kjennetegn-pa-maloppnaelse--engelsk-vg1-sfyf/. Accessed 2 Aug. 2022.
  51. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. (2019). National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion 2020 (LK20). English subject curriculum (ENG 01–04).
  52. O’Halloran, K., & Lim, F. V. (2014). Systemic functional multimodal discourse analysis. In S. Norris & C. D. Maier (Eds.), Interactions, Images and Texts: A Reader in Multimodality (pp. 137153). Mouton De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9781614511175.137
  53. Ørevik, S. (2015). From book to screen: changing genre patterns and communicative purposes. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(2), 102120. DOI: 10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-02-04
  54. Ørevik, S. (2022). Developing an Assessment Framework for Multimodal Text Production in the EAL Classroom: The Case of Persuasive Posters. In S. Diamantopoulou & S. Ørevik (Eds.), Multimodality in English Language Learning (pp. 257271). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003155300-18
  55. Romero, D., & Walker, D. (2010). Ethical dilemmas in representation: engaging participative youth. Ethnography and Education, 5(2), 209227. DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2010.493409
  56. Royce, T. (1998). Synergy on the Page: Exploring Intersemiotic Complementarity in Page-Based Multimodal Text. JASFL Occasional Papers, 1(1), 2550.
  57. Royce, T. (2007). Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In T. Royce & W. Bowcher (Eds.), New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.
  58. Selander, S. (1994). Pedagogiske texter och retorik. [Pedagogical texts and rhetoric]. In S. Selander & B. Englund (Eds.), Konsten att informera och övertyga. [The art of informing and persuading]. (pp. 4154). Stockholm: HLS Förlag.
  59. Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2017). Design för lärande: ett multimodalt perspektiv. [Designs for learning: a multimodal perspective]. Lund Studentlitteratur.
  60. Silseth, K., & Gilje, Ø. (2019). Multimodal composition and assessment: a sociocultural perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 2642. DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292
  61. Sindoni, M. G., Adami, E., Karatza, S., Marentzi, I., Moschini, I., Petroni, S., & Rocca, M. (2019). The Common Framework of Reference for Intercultural Digital Literacies. EU Made 4ll.
  62. Skulstad, A. S. (2009). The need for rethinking communicative competence. In R. J. Krumsvik (Ed.), Learning in the Network Society and the Digitized School (pp. 255267). Nova Science Publishers.
  63. Skulstad, A. S. (2022). Theoretical perspectives on choice in multimodal text production and consequences for EAL task design. In S. Diamantopoulou & S. Ørevik (Eds.), Multimodality in English Language Learning (pp. 146158). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003155300-11
  64. Tan, L., Zammit, K., D’warte, J., & Gearside, A. (2020). Assessing multimodal literacies in practice: a critical review of its implementations in educational settings. Language and Education, 34(2), 97114. DOI: 10.1080/09500782.2019.1708926
  65. Towndrow, P. A., Nelson, M. E., & Yusuf, W. (2013). Squaring Literacy Assessment with Multimodal Design: An Analytic Case for Semiotic Awareness. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(4), 327355. DOI: 10.1177/1086296X13504155
  66. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multiliteracies across the curriculum: Changing contexts of texts and image in classroom practice. Open University Press.
  67. Van Leeuwen, T. (2017). Multimodal literacy. Metaphor, 4, 1723.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.216 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 44 - 57
Submitted on: Oct 20, 2022
Accepted on: May 30, 2023
Published on: Jun 30, 2023
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2023 Sigrid Ørevik, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.