Upper Secondary School Students’ Design of Arguments in Essays
References
- Åkerfeldt, A., & Svärdemo Åberg, E. (2021). Designs for learning – a research approach. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(4), 547–555. DOI: 10.12973/ijem.7.4.547
- Archer, A. (2010). Multimodal text in higher education and the implications for writing pedagogy. English in Education, 44(3), 201–213. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-8845.2010.01073.x
- Archer, A. (2016).
Multimodal Academic Argument: Ways of Organising Knowledge across Writing and Image . In R. Fidalgo and T. Olive (Series Eds.) and A. Archer and E. O. Breuer (Vol Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 33, Multimodality in higher Education, 93–113. Leiden: Brill. DOI: 10.1163/9789004312067_007 - Ask, S. (2007). Vägar till ett akademiskt skriftspråk. [Paths to an academic written language]. Växjö universitet, Institutionen för Humaniora.
- Barton, D. (2007). Literacy, lives and learning. Routledge.
- Björklund Boistrup, L., & Selander, S. (2021). (eds) Designs for research, teaching and learning. A framework for future education. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003096498
- Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2009). “Multiliteracies”: New Literacies, New Learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 4(3), 164–195. DOI: 10.1080/15544800903076044
- Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Se texten! Multimodala texter i ämnesdidaktiskt arbete. [See the text! Multimodal texts in subject didactic work]. Gleerups.
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
- Groarke, L. (2015). Going Multimodal: What is a mode of arguing and Why Does it Matter. Argumentation, 29, 133–155. DOI: 10.1007/s10503-014-9336-0
- Higgins, S. (2014). Critical thinking for 21st-century education: A cyber-tooth curriculum? PROSPECTS, 44(4), 559–574. DOI: 10.1007/s11125-014-9323-0
- Howell, E., Butler, T., & Reinking, D. (2017). Integrating Multimodal Arguments Into High School Writing Instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 49(2), 181–209. DOI: 10.1177/1086296X17700456
- Huang, C.-W., & Archer, A. (2017). ‘Academic literacies’ as moving beyond writing: Investigating multimodal approaches to academic argument. London Reviews of Education, 15(1), 63-72. DOI: 10.18546/LRE.15.1.06
- Hyland, K. (2002).
Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing . Applied Linguistics, 23/2, Oxford University Press. 215–239. DOI: 10.1093/applin/23.2.215 - Ivanič, R. (2004). Discourses of writing and learning to write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220–245. DOI: 10.1080/09500780408666877
- Kim, S. M., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). Synergies: effects of source representation and goal instructions on evidence quality, reasoning, and conceptual integration during argumentation-driven inquiry. Instructional Science, 44, 441–476. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-016-9381-1
- Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
- Kress, G. (1989).
‘Texture and meaning’ . In R. Andrews (ed.) Narrative and Argument. Open University Press, 9–21. - Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203299234
- Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic perspective to contemporary communication. Routledge.
- Kress, G. (2017).
Semiotic work: design, transformation, transduction . In E. Insulander, S. Kjällander, F. Lindstrand, and A. Åkerfeldt (eds.), Didaktik i omvandlingens tid. Text, representation, design. Liber. - Kress, G., & Selander, S. (2011). Multimodal design, learning and cultures of recognition. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 265–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.12.003
- Lea, M., & Stierer, B. (2000). Students writing in higher education: new context. London; Philadelphia, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open U.P.
- Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacy approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–173. DOI: 10.1080/03075079812331380364
- Lea, M., & Street, B. (2006). The “Academic Literacies” Model: Theory and Applications. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 227–236. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
- Ledin, P. (2001). Genrebegreppet – en forskningsöversikt. [The genre concept – a research overview]. Studentlitteratur.
- Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). New direction in academic literacies. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 5–32.
- Lindstrand, F., & Selander, S. (2022).
Design in learning and rhizomatics webs . L. Björklund Boistrup and S. Selander (eds.), Designs for research, teaching and learning. A framework for future education. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003096498-2 - Macken-Horarik, M., Devereux, L., Trimingham-Jack, C., & Wilson, K. (2006). Negotiating the territory of tertiary literacies: A case study of teacher education. Linguistics and Education, 17(3), 240–257. DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2006.11.001
- Matta, C. (2019). Qualitative Research Methods and Evidential Reasoning. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 49(5), 385–412. DOI: 10.1177/0048393119862858
- Mitchell, S., & Riddle, M. (2000). Improving the quality of argument in higher education. Final Report. School of Lifelong Learning and Education: Middlesex University.
- Newell, D. E., Beach, R., Smith, J., & VaDerHeide, J. (2011). Teaching and learning argumentative reading and writing: A Review of research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 273–304.
- Northedge, A. (2003). Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 17–32. DOI: 10.1080/1356251032000052302
- Nygren, T., & Guath, M. (2019). Swedish teenagers’ difficulties and abilities to determine digital news credibility. Nordicom review, 40(1), 23–42. DOI: 10.2478/nor-2019-0002
- Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520. DOI: 10.3102/0034654313487606
- Selander, S. (2017). Didaktiken efter Vygotskij – Design för lärande. [Didactic after Vygotskij – Design for learning]. Liber.
- Selander, S., & Kress, G. (2010). Design för lärande. Ett multimodalt perspektiv. [Design for learning. A multimodal perspective]. Nordstedts.
- Svärdemo Åberg, E., Calissendorff, M., & Ståhle, Y. (2018). Förberedd för högskolestudier? En studie av hur “vetenskapligt grundat arbetssätt” tar skriftspråklig form i svenska gymnasiearbeten inom samhällsvetenskapsprogrammet. I Utbildning & lärande. 12(2), 7–23.
- Swedish Education Act, SFS. (2010:800). [Svensk skollag],
https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/skollag-2010800_sfs-2010-800 - Swedish National Agency for Education. (2012). [Gymnasiearbete för högskoleförberedande examen. Gymnasiearbetet – en introduktionstext].
https://www.skolverket.se - Solli, A. (2019). Handling socio-scientific controversy: Students’ reasoning through digital inquiry. University of Gothenburg.
- Thomas, G. (2011). The case: Generalisation, theory and phronesis in case study. Oxford Review of Education, 37(1), 21–35. DOI: 10.1080/03054985.2010.521622
- Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
- Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. Routledge.
- Venville, G. J., & Dawson, V. M. (2010). The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students’ argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 952–977. DOI: 10.1002/tea.20358
- Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’ Helping students understand what essays is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–145. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
- Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003).
The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education . In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Springer. 7–38. DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-4996-X_2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.174 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 85 - 98
Submitted on: May 2, 2021
Accepted on: May 30, 2022
Published on: Jun 28, 2022
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2022 Eva Svärdemo Åberg, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.