Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conditions for the Active Involvement of Teachers in a Design-Based Research Project Cover

Conditions for the Active Involvement of Teachers in a Design-Based Research Project

By:  and    
Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research a decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1625. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
  2. Andrée, M., Danckwardt-Lillieström, K., & Wiblom, J. (2020). Ethical Challenges of Symmetry in Participatory Science Education Research – Proposing a Heuristic for Ethical Reflection. In K. Otrel-Cass, M. Andrée, & M. Ryu (Eds.), Examining Ethics in Contemporary Science Education Research: Being Responsive and Responsible (pp. 123141). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50921-7_8
  3. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 18021811. DOI: 10.1177/1049732316654870
  4. Blair, E. (2015). A reflexive exploration of two qualitative data coding techniques. Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences, 6(1), 1429. DOI: 10.2458/v6i1.18772
  5. Bogaerds-Hazenberg, S., Evers-Vermeul, J., & van den Bergh, H. (2019). Teachers and researchers as co-designers? A design-based research on reading comprehension instruction in primary education. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 3(1). DOI: 10.15460/eder.3.1.1399
  6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 125. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
  7. Brodie, K. (2019). Teacher agency in professional learning communities In Professional Development in Education (pp. 114). Routledge.
  8. Day, C. (2017). Teachers’ worlds and work. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315170091
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227268. DOI: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
  10. Engeström, Y. (2011). From design experiments to formative interventions. Theory & Psychology, 21(5), 598628. DOI: 10.1177/0959354311419252
  11. Goldblatt, H., Karnieli-Miller, O., & Neumann, M. (2011). Sharing qualitative research findings with participants: Study experiences of methodological and ethical dilemmas. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3), 389395. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.016
  12. Goos, M. J. Z. (2014). Researcher–teacher relationships and models for teaching development in mathematics education. 46(2), 189200. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0556-9
  13. Hamza, K., Piqueras, J., Wickman, P.-O., & Angelin, M. (2018). Who Owns the Content and Who Runs the Risk? Dynamics of Teacher Change in Teacher–Researcher Collaboration. Research in Science Education, 48(5), 963987. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-016-9594-y
  14. Hargreaves, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teachers and Teaching, 25(5), 603621. DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2019.1639499
  15. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Texas: Southwest Education Development Laboratory.
  16. Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., & Meisalo, V. (2016). Pragmatic Design-Based Research – Designing as a Shared Activity of Teachers and Researches. In D. Psillos & P. Kariotoglou (Eds.), Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences: Introducing the Science of Materials in European Schools (pp. 3546). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7808-5_3
  17. Kelchtermans, G. (2006). Teacher collaboration and collegiality as workplace conditions. A review. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 52(2), 220237.
  18. Klette, K. (2000). Working-time blues: how Norwegian teachers experience restructuring in education. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hauge, & J. Møller (Eds.), The Life and Work of Teachers. International Perspectives in Changing Times (Vol. 1). London/New York: Falmer Press.
  19. Konrad, U., & Bakker, A. (2018). From implementer to co-designer: A teacher’s changing role in a design research project. In A. Bakker (Ed.), Design Research in Education A Practical Guide for Early Career Researchers (pp. 246254). Oxon, UK: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203701010-24
  20. Little, J. W. (1990). The persistence of Privacy: Autonomy and Initiative in Teachers’ Professional Relations. Teachers College Record, 9(14), 509536.
  21. NDET (2020). Curricula in English. Retrived 31.10.2020 from https://www.udir.no/in-english/curricula-in-english/. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training.
  22. Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 125136). Boston: Kluwer Academic. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
  23. Plomp, T. (2007). Educational design research: An introduction. In N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 935). Enschede: SLO.
  24. Reeves, T. C., & McKenney, S. (2012). 7 Things You Should Know About Educational Design Research. Educause. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/library/resources/7-things-you-should-know-about-educational-design-research.
  25. Rose, M. A., Shumway, S., Carter, V., & Brown, J. (2015). Identifying Characteristics of Technology and Engineering Teachers Striving for Excellence Using a Modified Delphi. Journal of Technology Education, 26(2), 221. DOI: 10.21061/jte.v26i2.a.1
  26. Schleicher, A. (2018). World Class: How to Build a 21st-Century School System. Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/9789264300002-en
  27. Sensevy, G., Forest, D., Quilio, S., & Morales, G. (2013). Cooperative engineering as a specific design-based research. ZDM, 45(7), 10311043. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-013-0532-4
  28. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 414. DOI: 10.2307/1175860
  29. Sterner, H. (2019). Teachers as actors in an educational design research: What is behind the generalized formula? LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 7(3). DOI: 10.31129/LUMAT.7.3.403
  30. Thomas, D. R. (2017). Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(1), 2341. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2016.1219435
  31. Vinnervik, P. (2020). Implementing programming in school mathematics and technology: teachers’ intrinsic and extrinsic challenges. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-020-09602-0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.169 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 44 - 54
Submitted on: Nov 17, 2020
Accepted on: Sep 15, 2021
Published on: Sep 27, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Berit Bungum, Anders Sanne, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.