A Model for Analysing Digital Mathematics Teaching Material from a Social Semiotic Perspective
By: Ida Bergvall and Anneli Dyrvold
References
- Alshwaikh, J. (2011). Geometrical diagrams as representation and communication: a functional analytic framework. Institute of Education, University of London.
- Bergvall, I. (2016). Bokstavligt, bildligt och symboliskt i skolans matematik – en studie om ämnesspråk i TIMSS. (PhD dissertation). Uppsala.
- Björkvall, A. (2009). Den visuella texten: Multimodal analys i praktiken. Stockholm: Hallgren & Fallgren.
- Dyrvold, A. (2020). Relations between semiotic resources in mathematics tasks: A source of students’ difficulties. Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 265–283. DOI: 10.1080/14794802.2019.1689160
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar (4 ed.). London: Arnold. DOI: 10.4324/9780203431269
- Holmberg, P., & Karlsson, A. (2006). Grammatik med betydelse: En introduktion till funktionell grammatik. Uppsala: Hallgren & Fallgren.
- Kress, G. R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203619728
- Lemke, J. L. (1998).
Multiplying Meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text . In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge. - Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. Bristol, PA: Farmer Press.
- OECD. (2015). Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection. PISA, OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/9789264239555-en
- O’Halloran, K. L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Bloomsbury UK.
- O’Halloran, K. L., Beezer, R. A., & Farmer, D. W. (2018). A new generation of mathematics textbook research and development. ZDM, 50(5), 863–879. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-018-0959-8
- Pepin, B., Choppin, J., Ruthven, K., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Digital curriculum resources in mathematics education: foundations for change. ZDM, 49(5), 645–661. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-017-0879-z
- Pohl, M., & Schacht, F. (2017). Digital mathematics textbooks: Analyzing structure of student uses. In G. Aldon & J. Trgalová (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching/ICTMT 2017
3rd to 6th July, 2017 (pp. 453–456). Lyon, France. - Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1–36. DOI: 10.1007/BF00302715
- Usiskin, Z. (2018). Electronic vs. paper textbook presentations of the various aspects of mathematics. ZDM, 50(5), 849–861. DOI: 10.1007/s11858-018-0936-2
- Utterberg, M., Tallvid, M., Lundin, J., & Lindström, B. (2019). Challenges in Mathematics Teachers’ Introduction to a Digital Textbook: Analyzing Contradictions. Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science Teaching, 38(4), 337–359.
- Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203647028
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.167 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 7
Submitted on: Sep 15, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 25, 2021
Published on: Apr 6, 2021
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2021 Ida Bergvall, Anneli Dyrvold, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.