Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Producing Digital Learning Resources (DLR) for Teacher Training Cover

Producing Digital Learning Resources (DLR) for Teacher Training

Open Access
|Aug 2020

References

  1. Arvola, M., Samuelsson, M., Nordvall, M., & Ragnemalm, E. L. (2018). Simulated Provocations: A Hypermedia Radio Theatre for Reflection on Classroom Management. Simulation & Gaming, 49(2), 98114. DOI: 10.1177/1046878118765594
  2. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 13(1), 114. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  3. Dahlstrom, E., & Bichsel, J. (2014). ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology, 2014. Louisville: EDUCAUSE.
  4. Dotger, B. H., & Smith, M. J. (2009). “Where’s the Line?” – Negotiating Simulated Experiences to Define Teacher Identity. The New Educator, 5(2), 161180. DOI: 10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399570
  5. Forbes, H., Oprescu, F. I., Downer, T., Phillips, N. M., McTier, L., Lord, B., … Visser, I. (2016). Use of videos to support teaching and learning of clinical skills in nursing education: A review. Nurse Education Today, 42, 5356. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.010
  6. Harasim, L. (2012). Learning theory and online technologies. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203846933
  7. Hermansen, H. (2017). Knowledge relations and epistemic infrastructures as mediators of teachers’ collective autonomy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.003
  8. Jaggars, S. S. (2014). Choosing Between Online and Face-to-Face Courses: Community College Student Voices. American Journal of Distance Education, 28(1), 2738. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2014.867697
  9. Johnson, L., Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Hall, C. (2016). NMC Horizon Report: 2016 Higher Education Edition. Austin: The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from http://cdn.nmc.org/media/2016-nmc-horizon-report-he-EN.pdf
  10. Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 6577. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504994
  11. Jönsson, A. (2008). Educative assessment for/of teacher competency. A study of assessment and learning in the “Interactive examination” for student teachers. Malmø: Malmö University. Retrieved from http://dspace.mah.se/dspace/bitstream/handle/2043/6182/educative_assessment_kappa.pdf?sequence=1
  12. Kirschner, P. A. (2015). Do we need teachers as designers of technology enhanced learning? Instructional Science, 43(2), 309322. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9
  13. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Los Angeles: SAGE.
  14. Lang, J. (2010). Significance of a multimedia resource in the professional learning of preservice teachers. In S. Howard (Ed.), AARE 2010: Proceedings of the 2010 Australian Association for Research in Education Conference (p. 18). Melbourne: AARE.
  15. Laurillard, D. (2002). Rethinking university teaching: A conversational framework for the effective use of learning technologies (2 ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer. DOI: 10.4324/9780203304846
  16. Laurillard, D. (2009). The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 520. DOI: 10.1007/s11412-008-9056-2
  17. Lund, A., & Eriksen, T. M. (2016). Teacher Education as Transformation: Some Lessons Learned from a Center for Excellence in Education. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 5372. DOI: 10.5617/adno.2483
  18. Major, L., & Watson, S. (2018). Using video to support in-service teacher professional development: the state of the field, limitations and possibilities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 4968. DOI: 10.1080/1475939X.2017.1361469
  19. McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015, March). Teacher design knowledge for technology enhanced learning: an ecological framework for investigating assets and needs. Instructional Science, 43(2), 181202. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-014-9337-2
  20. Metcalf, K. K., Hammer, M. A., & Kahlich, P. A. (1996, Mai). Alternatives to field-based experiences: The comparative effects of on-campus laboratories. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(3), 271283. DOI: 10.1016/0742-051X(95)00037-K
  21. Miao, F., Mishra, S., & McGreal, R. (Eds.) (2016). Open Educational Resources: Policy, Costs and Transformation. Paris: UNESCO/Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002443/244365e.pdf
  22. Ministry of Education. (2018). Tilstandsrapport for høyere utdanning 2018. Oslo: Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/eb4e02ae65134e42bba060e879536675/oppdatert-publiseringversjon-tilstandsrapport-2018.pdf
  23. Nilsen, A. G., & Almås, A. G. (2016, December 31). Added Values and Challenges Social Media Represent in the Hybridisation of Teacher Training. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 7587.
  24. Nilsen, A. G., Almås, A. G., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2013, June 18). Teaching Online or On-Campus? – What Students Say About Desktop Videoconferencing. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 8(01–02), 90106.
  25. Scanlon, E. (2010). Technology enhanced learning in science: interactions, affordances and design based research. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. DOI: 10.5334/2010-8
  26. Scott, C. L. (2015). THE FUTURES of LEARNING 3: What kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? Paris: UNESCO Education Research and Foresight. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002431/243126e.pdf
  27. Selwyn, N. (2014). Digital Technology and the Contemporary University. Degrees of digitization. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315768656
  28. Shear, L., Gallagher, L., & Patel, D. (2011). ITL Research 2011 Findings: Evolving Educational Ecosystems. In ITL research, Innovative Teaching and Learning Research. 2011 Findings and Implications, 929. Menlo Park: ITL research/SRI International.
  29. Stålbrandt, E. E. (2013). Simulerade skoldilemman – redskap för utveckling av reflektionsförmåga? Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press. Retrieved from http://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/88876/edman_eva.pdf?sequence=2
  30. Tømte, C. E. (2015). Educating Teachers for the New Millennium? Teacher training, ICT and digital competence. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 138154. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2015/Jubileumsnummer/educating_teachers_for_thenew_millennium_-_teacher_traini
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of Higher Psychological Processes. London: Harvard University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4
  32. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005, December). Design-Based Research and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 523. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504682
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.153 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 80
Submitted on: Jan 22, 2020
Accepted on: Aug 4, 2020
Published on: Aug 20, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Anders Grov Nilsen, Aslaug Grov Almås, Helene Gram, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.