Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Teaching about Personal Finance in HCS – Suggestions from a Design-Based Research Approach Cover

Teaching about Personal Finance in HCS – Suggestions from a Design-Based Research Approach

Open Access
|Apr 2020

References

  1. Almenberg, J., & Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2011). Financial literacy and retirement planning in Sweden. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(4), 585598. DOI: 10.1017/S1474747211000497
  2. Almenberg, J., Vestman, R., & Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2015). Finansinspektionens promemoria. Hälften av konsumenterna saknar grundläggande finanskunskaper. (FI Dnr 15–1579).
  3. Almenberg, J., & Widmark, O. (2011). Numeracy, financial literacy and participation in asset markets. Available at SSRN 1756674. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1756674
  4. Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 1625. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X11428813
  5. Banks, J., & Oldfield, Z. (2007). Understanding pensions: Cognitive function, numerical ability and retirement saving. Fiscal studies, 143170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00052.x
  6. Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The journal of the learning sciences, 13(1), 114. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
  7. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 28(3), 801831. DOI: 10.1086/345321
  8. Björklund, M. (2019). Teaching financial literacy: Competence, context and strategies among Swedish teachers. Journal of Social Science Education, 18(2), 2848.
  9. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), 141178. DOI: 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  10. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs. Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University press.
  11. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In New directions in educational technology (pp. 1522). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
  12. Danes, S. M., & Haberman, H. (2007). Teen financial knowledge, self-efficacy, and behavior: A gendered view. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 18(2).
  13. Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  14. Gauntlett, D. (2007). Creative Explorations. New Approaches to Identities and Audiences. London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203961407
  15. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.
  16. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.
  17. Hastings, J. S., & Tejeda-Ashton, L. (2008). Financial literacy, information, and demand elasticity: Survey and experimental evidence from Mexico. DOI: 10.3386/w14538
  18. Hernwall, P. (2013). Barn som medforskare – ökat medvetande genom deltagande. In K. Helander (Ed.), “Nu vill jag prata!”. Barns röster i barnkulturen, 46, 151169). Centrum för barnkulturforskning vid Stockholms universitet: Stockholms universitetsförlag.
  19. Hernwall, P., Hullgren, M., & Söderberg, I.-L. (2017). Barn och digital ekonomi. Hur lär barn om pengar och ekonomi i ett digitalt sammanhang? (TRITA- KTH-Cefin-SR-16-SE). Retrieved from Stockholm, KTH.
  20. Hernwall, P., Hullgren, M., & Söderberg, I.-L. (2018). Barns utvecklade förståelse av ekonomi – och utvecklingen av ett lärarstöd (TRITA-ABE-RPT-186). Retrieved from Stockholm, KTH.
  21. Hernwall, P., & Söderberg, I.-L. (2019). Barns förståelse av grundläggande privatekonomiska principer – implikationer för undervisning i HKK. [The understanding of children of basic financial principles – implications for HCS.]. Forskning om undervisning och lärande (ForskUL), 7(2), 111136.
  22. Hjalmarsson, A., Sjöholm, E., & Arvidsson, K. (2018). Hem- och konsumentkunskap åk 7–9 Limhamn: Interskol.
  23. Hjälmeskog, K., & Höijer, K. (Eds.) (2019). Didaktik för hem- och konsumentkunskap. Malmö: Gleerups.
  24. James, A., & Prout, A. (1997). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. London: Falmer press.
  25. Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203970034
  26. Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 15(2), 7. DOI: 10.1145/1375761.1375762
  27. Lindblom, C. (2016). Skolämnet Hem- och konsumentkunskap på 2000-talet: Förutsättningar för elevers möjlighet till måluppfyllelse. Dissertation. Umeå. Umeå universitet. ISBN 978-91-7601-498-1.
  28. Lindblom, C., Erixon Arreman, I., & Hörnell, A. (2013). Practical conditions for Home and Consumer Studies in Swedish compulsory education: A survey study. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(5), 556563. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12027
  29. Lusardi, A. (2015). Financial literacy: Do people know the ABCs of finance? Public Understanding of Science, 24(3), 260271. DOI: 10.1177/0963662514564516
  30. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2011). Financial literacy around the world: An overview. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 10(04), 497508. DOI: 10.1017/S1474747211000448
  31. Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Curto, V. (2010). Financial literacy among the young. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 44(2), 358380. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2010.01173.x
  32. McLaren, P. (1998). Life in Schools. An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education. ERIC.
  33. McLuhan, M. (1964/1994). Understanding media: the extension of man. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.
  34. OECD. (2005). Improving financial literacy: Analysis of issues and policies. Paris: OECD. DOI: 10.1787/9789264012578-en
  35. OECD. (2012). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD.
  36. OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume III): Students’ Well-Being (9264273859). Retrieved from Paris. DOI: 10.1787/9789264270282-en
  37. Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization studies, 28(9), 14351448. DOI: 10.1177/0170840607081138
  38. Reeves, T. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In J. Van den Akker, K. Gravemeijer, S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 6478). London: Routledge.
  39. Rettig, M. (1994). Prototyping for tiny fingers. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 2127. DOI: 10.1145/175276.175288
  40. Selander, S. (2017). Didaktiken efter Vygotskij. Design för lärande. Stockholm: Liber.
  41. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 6573. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
  42. Siibak, A., Forsman, M., & Hernwall, P. (2013). Employing Creative Research Methods with Tweens in Estonia and Sweden: Reflections on a Case Study of Identity Construction onSocial Networking Sites. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4), 250261. DOI: 10.1080/15228835.2012.745355
  43. Skolinspektionen. (2019). Hem- och konsumentkunskap i årskurs 7–9. [Home and consumer studies in grade 7–9.] Stockholm: Skolinspektionen.
  44. Skolverket. (2011). Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and the leisure-time centre. Lgr11. Stockholm: Skolverket.
  45. Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2008). The price is not right (not even on average): Exponential growth bias, present-biased perceptions and household finance. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1081633
  46. Stango, V., & Zinman, J. (2011). Fuzzy math, disclosure regulation, and market outcomes: Evidence from truth-in-lending reform. Review of Financial Studies, 24(2), 506534. DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhq089
  47. Stolterman, E., & Wiberg, M. (2010). Concept-driven interaction design research. Human–Computer Interaction, 25(2), 95118. DOI: 10.1080/07370020903586696
  48. Svenska Vetenskapsrådet. (2017). Good Research Practice. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
  49. Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: Technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of computer assisted learning, 26(1), 5364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00341.x
  50. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 58. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X032001005
  51. Tohidi, M., Buxton, W., Baecker, R., & Sellen, A. (2006). Getting the right design and the design right. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in computing systems. DOI: 10.1145/1124772.1124960
  52. Vanderhoven, E., Schellens, T., Vanderlinde, R., & Valcke, M. (2016). Developing educational materials about risks on social network sites: A design based research approach. Educational technology research and development, 64(3), 459480. DOI: 10.1007/s11423-015-9415-4
  53. Van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011). Financial literacy and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(2), 449472. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006
  54. Ventola, E., Charles, C., & Kaltenbacher, M. (2004). Perspectives on multimodality, 6. John Benjamins Publishing. DOI: 10.1075/ddcs.6
  55. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  56. Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 53(4), 523. DOI: 10.1007/BF02504682
  57. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85100). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. DOI: 10.1037/10096-004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.142 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 29 - 44
Submitted on: Apr 30, 2019
Accepted on: Apr 7, 2020
Published on: Apr 24, 2020
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Patrik Hernwall, Inga-Lill Söderberg, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.