The Three Spaces Model for Online CPD
References
- Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Mills, C., & Lester, N. C. (2002). Reflecting on Practice: Student Teachers’ Perspectives. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.
- Bernard, M. B., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., Tamim, R. M., & Abrami, Ph. C. (2014). A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 87–122. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3
- Bremholm, J. (2014). Veje og vildveje til læsning som ressource: Teksthændelser i naturfagsundervisning med og uden læseguide. Et interventionsstudie om literacy i naturfag i udskolingen. Ph.d.-afhandling.
- Bremholm, J. (2016). Elevopgaver og elevproduktioner i det 21. århundrede: Præsentation af projektet – forskningsspørgsmål, metode og hovedresultater. Rapport, AUUC demonstrationsskoler, Odense, Læremiddel.dk – retrieved January 19, 2018.
- Bremholm, J., Falkesgaard, M. S., & Hansen, R. (2017).
Scenariedidaktik og skolens opgavevirkelighed , i Hvad er scenariedidaktik, Aarhus Universitetsforlag. - Goodyear, P. (2005). Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(1), 82–101. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1344
- Heinerichs, S., Pazzaglia, G., & Gilboy, M. B. (2016). Using Flipped Classroom Components in Blended Courses to Maximize Student Learning, 11(1), 54–57. Retrieved January 10, 2018. DOI: 10.4085/110154
- Hughes, M., Ventura, S., & Dando, M. (2004). Online interprofessional learning: introducing constructivism through enquiry-based learning and peer review. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18(3). DOI: 10.1080/13561820410001731304
- Israel, M. J. (2015). Effectiveness of Integrating MOOCs in Traditional Classrooms for Undergraduate Students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 102–118. DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2222
- Laurillard, D. (2012).
Teaching as a design science . Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. New York: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203125083 - Lisewski, B., & Joyce, P. (2003). Examining the five-stage e-moderating model: designed and emergent practice in the learning technology profession. Research in Learning Technology, 11(1). DOI: 10.3402/rlt.v11i1.11267
- Mor, Y. (2013).
SNaP! Re-using, sharing and communicating designs and design knowledge using Scenarios, Narratives and Patterns . In R. Luckin, P. Goodyear, B. Grabowski, S. Puntambekar, N. Winters, & J. Underwood (Eds.), Handbook of Design in Educational Technology (pp. 189–200). Routledge. - Mor, Y., & Winters, N. (2007). Design approaches in technology enhanced learning. Interactive. Learning Environments, 15(1), 61–75. DOI: 10.1080/10494820601044236
- Nortvig, A. M., Petersen, A. K., & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning (accepted/in press).
- Potter, J. (2015). Applying a hybrid model: Can it enhance student learning outcomes? Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 17(11).
- Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? Educational Researcher, 29(January 1), 4–15. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X029001004
- Ryan, M., & Ryan, M. (2013). Theorising a model for teaching and assessing reflective learning in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(2), 244–257. DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2012.661704
- Ryan, S., Kaufman, J., Greenhouse, J., Joel, She, R., & Shi, J. (2016). The Effectiveness of Blended Online Learning Courses at the Community College Level. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(4), 285–298. DOI: 10.1080/10668926.2015.1044584
- Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating. The key to teaching and learning online. Routledge Falmer.
- Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online (2nd edition). London: Taylor & Francis.
- Salmon, G. (2016). The Five Stage Model. Retrieved January 10, 2018 –
https://www.gillysalmon.com/five-stage-model.html - Staunæs, D., & Bjerg, H. (2013). Tænketeknologier. Når forandringer består – projekter forgår. Skolen i Morgen, 8, 4–6.
- Taylor, S., & Ryan, M. (2015).
Teaching Peer Review Reflective Process in Accounting . In M. Ryan (Ed.), Teaching Reflective Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Approach Using Pedagogic Patterns. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09271-3_8 - Vygotsky, L. (1978).
Interaction Between Learning and Development . I: Gauvain og Cole (Red) Readings on the Development of Children (pp. 34–40). New York: Scientific American Books. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0478-34 - Warburton, S., & Mor, Y. (2015).
Double Loop Design: Configuring narratives, patterns and scenarios in the design of technology enhanced learning . In M. Maina, et al. (Eds.), The Art & Science of Learning Design (pp. 93–105). Sense Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-6300-103-8_7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16993/dfl.107 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7480
Language: English
Page range: 118 - 126
Submitted on: Apr 27, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 8, 2019
Published on: Aug 23, 2019
Published by: Stockholm University Press
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
© 2019 Malene Erkmann, Anne Kristine Petersen, Pernille Lomholt Christensen, published by Stockholm University Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.