References
- Heather Piwowar et al., “The State of OA: a Large-scale Analysis of the Prevalence and Impact of Open Access Articles,” PeerJ 6 (2018):
e4375 , DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4375 (accessed 26 May 2023). - Robert Heaton, Dylan Burns, and Becky Thoms, “Altruism or Self-Interest? Exploring the Motivations of Open Access Authors,” College & Research Libraries 80, no. 4 (3 May 2019): 485–507, DOI: 10.5860/crl.80.4.485 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- John Willinsky, “The Unacknowledged Convergence of Open Source, Open Access, and Open Science,” First Monday 10, no. 8 (2005),
https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/1265/1185?inline=1 (accessed 26 May 2023); Erin C. McKiernan et al., “How Open Science Helps Researchers Succeed,” eLife 5 (2016):e16800 , DOI: 10.7554/eLife.16800.001 (accessed 26 May 2023). - Rachel E. Scott and Anne Shelley, “‘Having a Textbook Locks Me into a Particular Narrative’: Affordable and Open Educational Resources in Music Higher Education,” Notes, the Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association 79, no. 3 (2023): 303–32, DOI: 10.1353/not.2023.0000 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Sara Bosshart, Rod Cookson, and Philipp Hess,
“Open Access through Subscribe to Open: A Society Publisher’s Implementation,” Insights 35 (2022), DOI: 10.1629/uksg.567 (accessed 26 May 2023); Ángel Borrego, Lluís Anglada, and Ernest Abadal, “Transformative Agreements: Do They Pave the Way to Open Access?,” Learned Publishing 34, no. 2 (2021): 217–232 DOI: 10.1002/leap.1347 (accessed 26 May 2023); Karen Brunsting, Caitlin Harrington, and Rachel E. Scott, Open Access Literature in Libraries: Principles and Practices (Chicago: ALA Editions, 2022), depositedhttps://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/fpml/163/ (accessed 26 May 2023). - Bonnie J. Swoger, Sue Ann Brainard, and Kimberly Davies Hoffman, “Foundations for a Scholarly Communications Program: Interviewing Faculty at a Small Public Liberal Arts College,” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3, no. 1 (2015):
e1219 , DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.1219 (accessed 26 May 2023); Rachel E. Scott and Anne Shelley, “Music Scholars and Open Access Publishing,” Notes, the Quarterly Journal of the Music Library Association 79, no. 2 (2022): 149–78, DOI: 10.1353/not.2022.0093 - Sara Rouhi, Romy Beard, and Curtis Brundy, “Left in the Cold: the Failure of APC Waiver Programs to Provide Author Equity,” Science Editor 45, no.1 (2022): 5–13,
https://www.eifl.net/system/files/resources/202205/csev45n1-pp5-13.pdf (accessed 26 May 2023). DOI: 10.36591/SE-D-4501-5 - Anthony J. Olejniczak and Molly J. Wilson, “Who’s Writing Open Access (OA) Articles? Characteristics of OA Authors at Ph. D.-granting Institutions in the United States,” Quantitative Science Studies 1, no. 4 (2020): 1429–1450, DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00091 (accessed 26 May 2023); Yimei Zhu, “Who Support Open Access Publishing? Gender, Discipline, Seniority and Other Factors Associated with academics’ OA practice,” Scientometrics 111, no. 2 (2017): 557–79 DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2316-z (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Jie Xu et al., “Chinese Researchers’ Perceptions and Use of Open Access Journals: Results of an Online Questionnaire Survey,” Learned Publishing 33, no. 3 (2020): 246–58, DOI: 10.1002/leap.1291 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Melissa Blankstein, S+R US Faculty Survey 2021: Research Report, (Ithaka, 2022), DOI: 10.18665/sr.316896 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Jylisa Doney and Jeremy Kenyon, “Researchers’ Perceptions and Experiences with an Open Access Subvention Fund,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 17, no. 1 (2022): 56–77 DOI: 10.18438/eblip30015 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Elisabeth Shook and Amy Vecchione, “Faculty Perceptions of Open Access Publishing: Investigating Faculty Publishing Habits to Evaluate Library Collection Alignment,” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 10, no. 1 (December 2022):
eP13216 , DOI: 10.31274/jlsc.13216 (accessed 26 May 2023). - Susan Vandagriff, “Publications and Evaluations: Conducting a Baseline Assessment of Open Access Adoption and Support at an R2 University,” Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 8, no. 1 (2020),
eP2392 , DOI: 10.7710/2162-3309.2392 (accessed 26 May 2023). - Tim Schlak and Alexis Macklin, “Open Access Overtaking Academic Library Leadership: Staying Ahead of the Organisational Dynamics an Increasingly Open Future May Bring,” New Review of Academic Librarianship 28, no. 2 (2022): 117–24, DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2022.2079539 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Anthony J. Olejniczak and Molly J. Wilson, “Who’s Writing Open Access (OA) Articles? Characteristics of OA Authors at Ph. D.-granting Institutions in the United States,” Quantitative Science Studies 1, no. 4 (2020): 1429–50, DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00091 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- John W. Creswell and Dana L. Miller, “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry,” Theory into Practice 39, no. 3 (2000): 124–30, at 129. DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
- Stefanie E. Warlick, and K. T. L. Vaughan, “Factors Influencing Publication Choice: Why Faculty Choose Open Access,” Biomedical Digital Libraries 4, no. 1 (2007): 1–12, DOI: 10.1186/1742-5581-4-1 (accessed 26 May 2023); Anna Severin et al., “Discipline-specific Open Access Publishing Practices and Barriers to Change: an Evidence-based Review,” F1000Research 7 (2018): 1925, DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17328.2 (accessed 2 June 2023); Scott and Shelley, “Music Scholars and Open Access Publishing”; Manjula Wijewickrema and Vivien Petras, “Journal Selection Criteria in an Open Access Environment: A Comparison Between the Medicine and Social Sciences,” Learned Publishing 30, no. 4 (2017): 289–300, DOI: 10.1002/leap.1113 (accessed 26 May 2023).
- Ernest Hugh O’Boyle
Jr. , George Christopher Banks, and Erik Gonzalez-Mulé. “The Chrysalis Effect: How Ugly Initial Results Metamorphosize into Beautiful Articles,” Journal of Management 43, no. 2 (2017): 376–399, DOI: 10.1177/0149206314527133 (accessed 26 May 2023). - Rick Anderson, “Is Rational Discussion of Open Access Possible?,” Insights 27, no. 2 (2014): 171–80, DOI: 10.1629/2048-7754.162 (accessed 26 May 2023).