References
- 1Diana Hicks et al., “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics,” Nature 520, (2015): 429–431, DOI: 10.1038/520429a (accessed 16 February 2022).
- 2“Recognition and rewards,” Utrecht University,
https://www.uu.nl/en/research/open-science/tracks/recognition-and-rewards (accessed 16 February 2022). - 3David Moher et al., “Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure,” PLOS Biology 16, no. 3 (2018):
e2004089 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2004089 (accessed 16 February 2022). - 4Lesley A. Schimanski and Juan Pablo Alperin, “The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future,” [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] F1000Research 7 (2018): 1605, DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.16493.1 (accessed 16 February 2022).
- 5Erin McKiernan, Juan Pablo Alperin, and Alice Fleerackers, “The ‘impact’ of the Journal Impact Factor in the review, tenure, and promotion process,” Impact of Social Sciences (blog), LSE, 26 April 2019,
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2019/04/26/the-impact-of-the-journal-impact-factor-in-the-review-tenure-and-promotion-process/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 6Clyde W. Holsapple, “Isn’t it about time to meet DORA?,” Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 28, no. 4 (2018): 287–290, DOI: 10.1080/10919392.2018.1522774 (accessed 21 February 2022).
- 7Chris Woolston, “Impact factor abandoned by Dutch university in hiring and promotion decisions,” Nature 595, (2021): 462, DOI: 10.1038/d41586-021-01759-5 (accessed 16 February 2022).
- 8“Making way for all aspects of quality,” The Dutch Research Council (NWO), last updated March 12, 2020,
https://www.nwo.nl/en/news/making-way-all-aspects-quality (accessed 16 February 2022). - 9STM, The STM Report 1968–2018, Fifth Edition, October 2018,
https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_10_04_STM_Report_2018.pdf (accessed 16 February 2022). - 10Chris R. Triggle et al., “Requiem for impact factors and high publication charges,” Accountability in Research 29, no. 3 (2021): 133–164, DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2021.1909481 (accessed 21 February 2022).
- 11“Résumé for Researchers,” The Royal Society,
https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/research-culture/tools-for-support/resume-for-researchers/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 12Global Research Council, Responsible Research Assessment, Global Research Council (GRC) Conference Report 2021,
https://www.globalresearchcouncil.org/fileadmin/documents/GRC_Publications/GRC_RRA_Conference_Summary_Report.pdf (accessed 16 February 2022). - 13“Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics,” Leiden Manifesto,
http://www.leidenmanifesto.org/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 14David Moher et al., “The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity,” PLOS Biology 18, no. 7 (2020):
e3000737 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737 (accessed 16 February 2022). - 15“American Society for Cell Biology,” The American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB),
https://sfdora.org/resource/american-society-for-cell-biology/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 16“What is DORA?,” The American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB),
https://sfdora.org/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 17Kenneth Ruud, “Implementing DORA at UiT The Arctic University of Norway,” The 13th Munin Conference on Scholarly Publishing 2018, No. 1 (2018), DOI: 10.7557/5.4614 (accessed 16 February 2022).
- 18“Reimagining academic assessment: stories of innovation and change,” The American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB),
https://sfdora.org/dora-case-studies/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 19Andrew Aken, “CHUNK: An Agile Approach to the Software Development Life Cycle,” Journal of Internet Commerce 7, no. 3 (2008): 313–338, DOI: 10.1080/15332860802250385 (accessed 21 February 2022).
- 20“San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment,” The American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB),
https://sfdora.org/read/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 21“What are Altmetrics?,” Altmetric,
https://www.altmetric.com/about-altmetrics/what-are-altmetrics/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 22“About I4OC,” I4OC,
https://i4oc.org/#about (accessed 16 February 2022). - 23The American Society for Cell Biology (ASCB), “San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment”.
- 24Taylor & Francis Group, “The use of metrics in research assessment: share your views,” Taylor & Francis Editor Resources, 6 January 2020,
https://editorresources.taylorandfrancis.com/peersupport/the-use-of-metrics-in-research-assessment/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 25“About us,” Society Publishers’ Coalition,
https://www.socpc.org/about-us (accessed 16 February 2022). - 26“Journal Metrics,” Taylor & Francis Online,
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=journalMetrics&journalCode=tres20 (accessed 16 February 2022). - 27“Understanding Journal Metrics,” Taylor & Francis Author Services,
https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/publishing-your-research/choosing-a-journal/journal-metrics/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 28Taylor & Francis Group, “Taylor & Francis signs up to principles outlined in DORA supporting balanced and fair research assessment,” Taylor & Francis Group Newsroom, 3 March 2021,
https://newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/taylor-francis-signs-up-to-principles-outlined-in-dora-supporting-balanced-and-fair-research-assessment/ (accessed 16 February 2022). - 29Hylke Dijkstra (@DijkstraHylke), “Taylor and Francis journals now have “journal metrics” on their website. And I love it”
https://twitter.com/DijkstraHylke/status/1362778481873072132 (accessed 16 February 2022). - 30Prof David Bailey (@dgbailey), “Delighted that the journal metrics tab has been changed on the @tandfonline portal for all @regstud journals including @RegionalStudies, in line with DORA principles. It’s better to use a variety of metrics.”
https://twitter.com/dgbailey/status/1368899007481847809 (accessed 16 February 2022).