References
- 1Philip M. Davies et. al, “Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trial,” BMJ, 337 (2008): a568, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.a568 (accessed 19 October 2021).
- 2Xianwen Wang et. al, “The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention,” Scientometrics, 103 (2005): 555–564, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0 (accessed 19 October 2021).
- 3Kim Holmberg et. al, “Do articles in open access journals have more frequent altmetric activity than articles in subscription-based journals? An investigation of the research output of Finnish universities,” Scientometrics, 122 (2020): 645–659, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-019-03301-x (accessed 19 October 2021).
- 4Jonathan P. Tennant et. al, “The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review,” F1000 Research, 5 (2016): 632, DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.8460.3 (accessed 19 October 2021).
- 5Alkim Ozaygen,
“Analysing the usage data of open access scholarly books: What can data tell us?,” PhD thesis, Curtin University, (2019),http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/79585 (accessed 19 October 2021). - 6Ronald Snijder, “Do developing countries profit from free books? Discovery and online usage in developed and developing countries compared,” Journal of Electronic Publishing, 16, no. 1 (2013), DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0016.103 (accessed 19 October 2021).
- 7“The OA Effect,” Springer Nature, 2017,
https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/journals-books/books/the-oa-effect (accessed 19 October 2021). - 8Alkim Ozaygen, Lucy Montgomery, and Cameron Neylon,
Data for: “More Readers in More Places: The benefits of open access for scholarly books,” Zenodo, (2020), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4018842 (accessed 19 October 2021). - 9Alkim Ozyagen, Cameron Neylon, and Karl Huang, Code for: “More Readers in More Places: The benefits of open access for scholarly books,” Zenodo, (2020), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4019215 (accessed 19 October 2021).