References
- 1Matthew H Todd, “Open access and open source in chemistry,” Chemistry Central Journal 1, no. 3 (2007), DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-1-3 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 2Stevan Harnad and Tim Brody, “Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals,” D-Lib Magazine 10, no. 6 (2004): 1–6,
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/harnad/06harnad.html (accessed 18 March 2021). - 3Mario Pagliaro, “Preprints in Chemistry: An Exploratory Analysis of Differences with Journal Articles,” Publications 9, no. 1 (2021): 5. DOI: 10.3390/publications9010005 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 4Heather Piwowar et al., “The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles,” PeerJ 6 (2018):
e4375 , DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4375 (accessed 18 March 2021). - 5Francesca R Novara, “A Big Year for Open Access Chemistry Publishing,” ChemistryOpen 9, no. 1 (2020): 4–7, DOI: 10.1002/open.201900361 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 6Kamila Markram,
“Open Science: the time is now, the place is Europe,” EuroScience Open Forum 2018, Toulouse, 9–14 July 2018,www.slideshare.net/kamilamarkram/open-science-the-time-is-now-the-place-is-europe (accessed 18 March 2021). - 7Bo-Christer Björk and David Solomon, “The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals,” Journal of Informetrics 7, no. 4 (2013): 914–923, DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.09.001 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 8Mario Pagliaro, “Publishing Scientific Articles in the Digital Era,” Open Science Journal 5, no. 3 (2020): 3, DOI: 10.23954/osj.v5i3.2617 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 9Michael Woelfle, Piero Olliaro and Matthew H Todd, “Open science is a research accelerator,” Nature Chemistry 3, no. 9 (2011): 745–748, DOI: 10.1038/nchem.1149 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 10Emma L Schymanski and Antony J Williams, “Open Science for Identifying ‘Known Unknown’ Chemicals,” Environmental Science & Technology 51, no. 10 (2017) 5357–5359, DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01908 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 11Jean-Claude Bradley, Kevin Owens, and Antony Williams, “Chemistry Crowdsourcing and Open Notebook Science,” Nature Precedings (2008), DOI: 10.1038/npre.2008.1505.1 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 12Piera Demma Carà, Rosaria Ciriminna, and Mario Pagliaro, “Has the Time Come for Preprints in Chemistry?,” ACS Omega 2, no. 11 (2017): 7923–7928, DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01190 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 13François-Xavier Coudert, “The rise of preprints in chemistry,” Nature Chemistry 12, no. 6 (2020): 499–502, DOI: 10.1038/s41557-020-0477-5 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 14The Directory of Open Access Journals (2020),
https://doaj.org (accessed 18 March 2021). - 15“Open Science”, Substantia 3, no. 2 Suppl. 6 (2019),
https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/subs/issue/view/37 (accessed 18 March 2021). - 16“Water in biology: what’s so special about it?”, Substantia 3, no. 2 Suppl. 3 (2019),
https://riviste.fupress.net/index.php/subs/issue/view/30 (accessed 18 March 2021). - 17“Springer buys BioMed Central,” Research information, October 9, 2008,
www.researchinformation.info/news/springer-buys-biomed-central (accessed 18 March 2021). - 18Emma K Wilson and Jamie Humphrey, “Successfully transitioning the world’s largest chemistry subscription journal to a gold open access publication,” Insights 30, no. 1 (2017): 38–46, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.343 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 19Scopus,
www.scopus.com (accessed 18 March 2021). - 20Peter Suber, “Open Access Overview,” December 5, 2015,
https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/overview.htm - 21Oliver Budzinski, Thomas Grebel, Jens Wolling, and Xijie Zhang, “Drivers of article processing charges in open access,” Scientometrics 124, no. 3 (2020): 2185–2206, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 22Aileen Fyfe et al., “Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research,” Zenodo (2017), DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.546100 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 23Analysis carried out by Frontiers using SCImago data covering journals indexed by Scopus (2020),
https://reports.frontiersin.org/progress/2019/ (accessed 18 March 2021). - 24Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon, “The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era,” PLOS One 10, no. 6 (2015):
e012750 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 (accessed 18 March 2021). - 25Per O Seglen, “The skewness of science,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 43, no. 9 (1992): 628–638, DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199210)43:9<;628::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-0 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 26Stephen Curry, “Sick of Impact Factors,” Occam’s Typewriter, August 13, 2012,
http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2012/08/13/sick-of-impact-factors/ (accessed 18 March 2021). - 27Rosaria Ciriminna and Mario Pagliaro, “On the use of the h-index in evaluating chemical research,” Chemistry Central Journal 7, (2013): 132, DOI: 10.1186/1752-153X-7-132 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 28Harold Varmus, Patrick Brown, and Michael Eisen, “Open Letter,” October 2000,
https://plos.org/open-letter/ (accessed 18 March 2021). - 29Stevan Harnad,
“A Keystroke Koan for our Open Access Times,” August 7, 2005,http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/261125 University of Southampton Institutional Repository (accessed 18 March 2021). - 30Mikael Laakso, “Green open access policies of scholarly journal publishers: a study of what, when, and where self-archiving is allowed,” Scientometrics 99, no. 2 (2014): 475–494, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1205-3 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 31
“History of MDPI,” MDPI (2020),www.mdpi.com/about/history (accessed 18 March 2021). - 32Anthony J Olejniczak and Molly J Wilson, “Who’s writing open access (OA) articles? Characteristics of OA authors at Ph.D.-granting institutions in the United States,” Quantitative Science Studies 1, no. 4 (2020): 1429–1450, DOI: 10.1162/qss_a_00091 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 33Bill Town, “A Preprint Server for Chemistry,” Chemistry International 24, no. 4 (2002): 14–15, DOI: 10.1515/ci.2002.24.4.14 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 34Sunghwan Kim et al., “PubChem Substance and Compound databases,” Nucleic Acids Research 44, issue D1 (2016): D1202–D1213, DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv951 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 35Mario Pagliaro, “An Industry in Transition: The Chemical Industry and the Megatrends Driving Its Forthcoming Transformation,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 33 (2019): 11154–11159, DOI: 10.1002/anie.201905032 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 36Mario Pagliaro, “Purposeful Evaluation of Scholarship in the Open Science Era,” Challenges 12, no. 1 (2021): 6. DOI: 10.3390/challe12010006 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 37Alexandra-Cristina Ticea,
“Open Research as a Tool for Knowledge That Benefits Everyone” in The Global Benefits of Open Research, Martyn Rittman (Ed.), (Basel: MDPI, 2018), DOI: 10.3390/books978-3-03897-010-1 (accessed 18 March 2021). - 38Darwin Y Fu and Jacob J Hughey, “Meta-Research: Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article,” eLife 8 (2019):
e52646 , DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52646 (accessed 18 March 2021). - 39Lesley A Schimanski and Juan Pablo Alperin, “The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future,” F1000Research 7 (2018): 1605, DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.16493.1 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 40Mario Pagliaro, “Chemistry Education Fostering Creativity in the Digital Era,” Israel Journal of Chemistry 59, no. 6–7 (2019): 565–571, DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201800179 (accessed 18 March 2021).
- 41Erin C McKiernan, “Imagining the ‘open’ university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education,” PLOS Biology 15, no. 10 (2017):
e1002614 , DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002614 (accessed 18 March 2021).