Every nook and cranny: making the library central to research and engagement

Katherine Stephan

doi:10.1629/uksg.528

Abstract

This article discusses the institutional spaces, both large and small, where academic libraries may become embedded in research-related activities throughout the university. It then goes on to consider some of the possible changes and outcomes as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic. It outlines current research on opportunities for change in libraries, researcher demands, collaboration and the need for more research about working together. It concludes by suggesting that libraries and individuals should embrace principles of ‘planned happenstance’ so as to expand what may be possible with our new working spaces and realities.

References

1Ruth Harrison, “The Academic Library and the Research Office: Providing Scholarly Communications Support at Imperial College London-A Case Study,” Collaboration and the Academic Library, (Oxford, England: Chandos, 2018), 143–150, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-102084-5.00013-4 (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
2Wendy White, “Libraries and Research: Five Key Themes for Sustainable Innovation in Strategy and Services”, New Review of Academic Librarianship, 23, no. 2–3 (2017): 85–88, DOI: 10.1080/13614533.2017.1355637 (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
3White, “Libraries and Research: Five Key Themes for Sustainable Innovation in Strategy and Services,” 88.
Back to article
4Colin Nickels and Hilary Davis “Understanding Researcher Needs and Raising the Profile of Library Research Support,” Insights 33, no. 1 (2020): 4, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.493 (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
5Cath Dishman and Katherine Stephan, “Destroying the Silo: How Breaking down Barriers Can Lead to Proactive and Co-operative Researcher Support,” Insights 32, no. 1 (2019): 32, DOI: 10.1629/uksg.479 (accessed 1 December 2020).
Back to article
6Nickels and Davis, “Understanding Researcher Needs and Raising the Profile of Library Research Support,” 3.
Back to article
7Eddy Verbaan and Andrew M. Cox, “Occupational sub-cultures, jurisdictional struggle and Third Space: theorising professional service responses to Research Data Management,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, no. 3–4 (2014): 211–219, DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2014.02.008 (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
8Verbaan and Cox, “Occupational sub-cultures, jurisdictional struggle and Third Space: theorising professional service responses to Research Data Management”, 218.
Back to article
9Cara Bradley, “Research Support Priorities of and Relationships among Librarians and Research Administrators: A Content Analysis of the Professional Literature,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 13, no. 4 (2018): 15–30, DOI: 10.18438/eblip29478 (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
10Bradley, “Research Support Priorities of and Relationships among Librarians and Research Administrators: A Content Analysis of the Professional Literature,” 2.
Back to article
11Andrew M. Cox and Eddy Verbaan, “How academic librarians, IT staff, and research administrators perceive and relate to research,” Library & Information Science Research 38, no. 4 (2016): 319–326, DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2016.11.004 (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
12“Home,” Home, NoWAL, https://www.nowal.ac.uk/ (accessed 7 December 2020).
Back to article
13Kathleen E. Mitchell, Al S. Levin and John D. Krumboltz, “Planned Happenstance: Constructing Unexpected Career Opportunities,” Journal of Counselling and Development 77, (Spring 1999): 115–124, DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02431.x
Back to article
14Mitchell, Levin and Krumboltz, “Planned Happenstance: Constructing Unexpected Career Opportunities,” 118.
Back to article
15Katherine Stephan, “Research cafes: how libraries can build communities through research and engagement,” Insights 31, no. 36 (2018), DOI: 10.1629/uksg.436 (accessed 8 December 2020).
Back to article

Every nook and cranny: making the library central to research and engagement

Abstract

Paradigm

My account