References
- 1cOAlition S, ‘Plan S: Making Full and Immediate Open Access a Reality’, 2018,
https://www.coalition-s.org/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 2cOAlition S.
- 3Danny Kingsley, ‘Most Plan S Principles Are Not Contentious’, Unlocking Research (blog), 12 September 2018,
https://unlockingresearch-blog.lib.cam.ac.uk/?p=2145 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 4Dan Pollock and Ann Michael, ‘News & Views: Potential Impact of Plan S’, Delta Think (blog), 24 September 2018,
https://deltathink.com/news-views-potential-impact-of-plan-s/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 5Martin Enserink, ‘In Dramatic Statement, European Leaders Call for “Immediate” Open Access to All Scientific Papers by 2020’, Science | AAAS (blog), 27 May 2016,
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/dramatic-statement-european-leaders-call-immediate-open-access-all-scientific-papers (accessed 20 December 2018). - 6Rob Johnson et al., ‘Towards a Competitive and Sustainable OA Market in Europe – A Study of the Open Access Market and Policy Environment’ (Zenodo, 28 February 2017); DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.401029 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 7Carlos Moedas, ‘Statement by Carlos Moedas: “Plan S” and “COAlition S” – Accelerating the Transition to Full and Immediate Open Access to Scientific Publications’, European Commission, 4 September 2018,
https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2014-2019/moedas/announcements/plan-s-and-coalition-s-accelerating-transition-full-and-immediate-open-access-scientific_en (accessed 20 December 2018). - 8‘Monitoring the Transition to Open Access: December 2017’,
https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Pages/monitoring-transition-open-access-2017.aspx (accessed 20 December 2018); David Matthews, ‘Huge Rise in Subscription Costs despite Open Access Switch’, Times Higher Education (THE) (blog), 5 December 2017,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/huge-rise-subscription-costs-despite-open-access-switch (accessed 20 December 2018); D. Matthews, ‘Deal Impasse Severs Elsevier Access for Some German Universities’, Times Higher Education (THE), 6 January 2017,https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/deal-impasse-severs-elsevier-access-some-german-universities (accessed 20 December 2018). - 9Holly Else, ‘Nature – Radical Open-Access Plan Could Spell End to Journal Subscriptions’, 4 September 2018,
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06178-7 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 10David Prosser, ‘RLUK – Plan S – A Major Shift for Open Access in Europe’, 5 September 2018,
https://www.rluk.ac.uk/plan-s-a-major-shift-for-open-access-in-europe/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 11‘UK Research Funders Target Hybrid Open Access Charges | THE News’,
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/uk-research-funders-target-hybrid-open-access-charges (accessed 1 November 2018). - 12Bianca Kramer, ‘Funders PlanS – Dimensions/Unpaywall – Sept 2018’, Google Docs,
https://tinyurl.com/cOAlitionS-OA-2017 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 13Jonathan P. Tennant et al., ‘The Academic, Economic and Societal Impacts of Open Access: An Evidence-Based Review’, F1000Research 5 (September 2016): 632; DOI: 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.8460.3 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 14Marc Schiltz, ‘Preamble by Marc Schiltz: Science Without Publication Paywalls: A Preamble to: COAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access’, 4 September 2018,
https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/cOAlitionS_Preamble.pdf (accessed 20 December 2018). - 15Peter Suber,
‘Creating an Intellectual Commons through Open Access’ , in Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2007),https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/4552055 (accessed 20 December 2018); Leslie Chan, Barbara Kirsop, and Subbiah Arunachalam, ‘Towards Open and Equitable Access to Research and Knowledge for Development’, PLOS Medicine 8, no. 3 (29 March 2011): e1001016; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001016 (accessed 20 December 2018). Mass.: MIT Press, 2007 - 16Charlotte Hess and Elinor Ostrom,
‘Introduction: An Overview of the Knowledge Commons’ , in Understanding Knowledge as a Commons (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2007), 3. - 17Richard Wellen, ‘Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs: On the Political Economy of Academic Unbundling’, SAGE Open 3, no. 4 (October 2013): 215824401350727; DOI: 10.1177/2158244013507271 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 18Jeroen Bosman et al., ‘The Scholarly Commons – Principles and Practices to Guide Research Communication’; DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6c2xt (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 19Wellen, ‘Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs’.
- 20Max Planck Society, ‘Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities’, 2013,
https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration (accessed 20 December 2018). - 21Science Europe, ‘COAlition S: Making Open Access a Reality by 2020: A Declaration of Commitment by Public Research Funders’.
- 22Rick Anderson, ‘Diversity in the Open Access Movement, Part 1: Differing Definitions – The Scholarly Kitchen’, The Scholarly Kitchen (blog), 23 January 2017,
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/01/23/diversity-open-access-movement-part-1-differing-definitions/ (accessed 20 December 2018); By, ‘Diversity in the Open Access Movement, Part 2: Differing Goals’, The Scholarly Kitchen, 24 January 2017,https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/01/24/diversity-open-access-movement-part-2-differing-goals/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 23Michelle Gluck et al., ‘Standards, Norms, and Best Practices Workgroup Report’, Open Scholarship Initiative Proceedings 2, no. 0 (2 November 2017); DOI: 10.13021/G8osi.1.2017.1932 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 24Marc Schiltz, ‘There Is No Such Thing as the “One True Definition of OA”. That Is Why We Use a Consensus Definition.’, Tweet, @marcschiltz1 (blog), 11 October 2018,
https://twitter.com/marcschiltz1/status/1050473424357867525 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 25Leonid Schneider, ‘Response to Plan S from Academic Researchers: Unethical, Too Risky!’, For Better Science (blog), 11 September 2018,
https://forbetterscience.com/2018/09/11/response-to-plan-s-from-academic-researchers-unethical-too-risky/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 26Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), ‘Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research’, 2013,
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf (accessed 20 December 2018). - 27Suber, ‘Creating an Intellectual Commons through Open Access’.
- 28Michael A. Heller, ‘The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets’, Harvard Law Review 111, no. 3 (1998): 621–88; DOI: 10.2307/1342203 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 29John Wenzler, ‘Scholarly Communication and the Dilemma of Collective Action: Why Academic Journals Cost Too Much | Wenzler | College & Research Libraries’, February 2017, 189; DOI: 10.5860/crl.78.2.16581 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 30Jeffrey Beall, ‘What the Open-Access Movement Doesn’ Want You to Know’, AAUP (blog), May 2015,
https://www.aaup.org/article/what-open-access-movement-doesn%E2%80%99t-want-you-know#.XBNwYGj7SUk (accessed 20 December 2018); Robin Osborne, ‘Why Open Access Makes No Sense’, The Guardian, 8 July 2013, sec. Education,https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/jul/08/open-access-makes-no-sense (accessed 20 December 2018). - 31Schiltz, ‘Preamble by Marc Schiltz: Science Without Publication Paywalls: A Preamble to: COAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access’.
- 32Mancur Olsen, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Second Printing with New Preface and Appendix, Revised Edition (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971).
- 33Olsen, 52.
- 34Wenzler, ‘Scholarly Communication and the Dilemma of Collective Action’, 194.
- 35Tim Crane, ‘The Peer Review Industry: Implausible and Outrageous’, The TLS, 23 October 2018,
https://www.the-tls.co.uk/articles/public/peer-review-industry-implausible-outrageous/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 36Antoaneta Roussi, ‘Robert-Jan Smits, the Open-Plan Architect’, Research, 9 April 2018,
https://www.researchprofessional.com/0/rr/news/europe/infrastructure/2018/9/Robert-Jan-Smits-the-open-plan-architect.html (accessed 21 December 2018). - 37Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Reissue edition (Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2015); DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316423936
- 38‘Government Mistaken in Focusing on Gold as Route to Full Open Access – News from Parliament’, UK Parliament, 10 September 2013,
https://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/business-innovation-and-skills/news/on-publ-open-access/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 39Else, ‘Nature – Radical Open-Access Plan Could Spell End to Journal Subscriptions’.
- 40‘DFG, German Research Foundation – DFG Statement on the Establishment of “COAlition S” to Support Open Access’,
http://www.dfg.de/en/research_funding/announcements_proposals/2018/info_wissenschaft_18_56/index.html (accessed 20 December 2018). - 41Thomas Eger and Marc Scheufen, The Economics of Open Access: On the Future of Academic Publishing (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018),
https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/the-economics-of-open-access (accessed 20 December 2018); DOI: 10.4337/9781785365768 - 42Schneider, ‘Response to Plan S from Academic Researchers: Unethical, Too Risky!’; The British Academy, ‘Science Europe’s Plan S: Making It Work for All Researchers’, 16 November 2018,
https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/publications/science-europes-plan-s-making-it-work-for-all-researchers (accessed 20 December 2018). - 43Vincent Larivière and Cassidy R. Sugimoto, ‘Do Authors Comply When Funders Enforce Open Access to Research?’, Nature 562, no. 7728 (October 2018): 483; DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-07101-w (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 44cOAlition S, ‘Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S’, Plan S, accessed 27 November 2018,
https://www.coalition-s.org/feedback/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 45Jon Tennant, ‘Scholarly Publishing Is Broken. Here’s How to Fix It’, Aeon Ideas (blog), accessed 1 November 2018,
https://aeon.co/ideas/scholarly-publishing-is-broken-heres-how-to-fix-it (accessed 20 December 2018); George Monbiot, ‘Scientific Publishing Is a Rip-off. We Fund the Research – It Should Be Free | George Monbiot’, The Guardian, 13 September 2018, sec. Opinion,https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/13/scientific-publishing-rip-off-taxpayers-fund-research (accessed 20 December 2018). - 46Johnson et al.,
‘Towards a Competitive and Sustainable OA Market in Europe – A Study of the Open Access Market and Policy Environment’ ; Jonathan Tennant and Björn Brembs, ‘RELX Referral to EU Competition Authority’ (Zenodo, 26 October 2018); DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1472045 - 47Ostrom, Governing the Commons, 182.
- 48Vincent Larivière, Stefanie Haustein, and Philippe Mongeon, ‘The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era’, PLoS ONE 10, no. 6 (2015):
e0127502–e0127502 ; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 49David Wojick, ‘David Wojick’s Writings and Stuff: Euro Funders Float Radical Rules’, David Wojick’s Writings and Stuff (blog), 24 September 2018,
https://davidwojick.blogspot.com/2018/09/euro-funders-float-radical-rules.html (accessed 20 December 2018). - 50Pollock and Michael, ‘News & Views: Potential Impact of Plan S’.
- 51Steven Inchcoombe,
‘The Best Laid Plan S…’ , The Bookseller (blog), 10 October 2018,https://www.thebookseller.com/blogs/best-laid-plan-s-872011 (accessed 20 December 2018); Claire Redhead, ‘OASPA Offers Support on the Implementation of Plan S’, OASPA (blog), 2 October 2018,https://oaspa.org/oaspa-offers-support-on-the-implementation-of-plan-s/ (accessed 20 December 2018); STM Association, ‘STM Statement on Plan S: Accelerating the Transition to Full and Immediate Open Access to Scientific Publications.’, September 2018,https://www.stm-assoc.org/2018_09_04_STM_Statement_on_PlanS.pdf (accessed 21 December 2018); Association of American Publishers, ‘AAP, Researchers, Deeply Concerned About Plan S’, AAP, 8 November 2018,http://newsroom.publishers.org/aap-researchers-deeply-concerned-about-plan-s/ (accessed 21 December 2018). - 52Kent Anderson, ‘Focusing on Value – 102 Things Journal Publishers Do (2018 Update) – The Scholarly Kitchen’, The Scholarly Kitchen (blog), 6 February 2018,
https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2018/02/06/focusing-value-102-things-journal-publishers-2018-update/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 53Fair Open Access Alliance, ‘The Fair Open Access Alliance (FOAA) on Plan S’, FOAA (blog),
https://www.fairopenaccess.org/2018/09/20/the-fair-open-access-alliance-foaa-on-plan-s/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 54cOAlition S, ‘Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S’.
- 55Open Access Agreements and Licenses Task Force,
‘Open Access Clauses in Publishers’ Licenses – Current State and Lessons Learned’ (Confederation of Open Access Repositories, 2014),https://www.coar-repositories.org/activities/repository-content/licenses/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 56‘Monitoring the Transition to Open Access: December 2017’.
- 57Elinor Ostrom et al.,
‘The Future of the Commons – Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation’ , SSRN Scholarly Paper (Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 10 December 2012), 31,https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2267381 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 58Wellcome Trust, ‘Open Access Policy’, accessed 27 November 2018,
https://wellcome.ac.uk/funding/guidance/open-access-policy (accessed 20 December). - 59Charlotte Hess, ‘The Unfolding of the Knowledge Commons’, St Antony’s International Review 8, no. 1 (2012): 13–24.
- 60Stuart M. Shieber, ‘Equity for Open-Access Journal Publishing’, PLOS Biology 7, no. 8 (4 August 2009):
e1000165 ; DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000165 (accessed 20 December 2018). - 61‘Open Access to Scientific Publications Must Become a Reality by 2020 – Robert-Jan Smits’, Horizon: the EU Research & Innovation magazine,
https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/open-access-scientific-publications-must-become-reality-2020-robert-jan-smits.html (accessed 20 December 2018). - 62Schneider, ‘Response to Plan S from Academic Researchers: Unethical, Too Risky!’
- 63Peter Suber, ‘Thoughts on Plan S’, Peter Suber (blog), 4 September 2018,
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+PeterSuber/posts/iGEFpdYY9dr (accessed 20 December 2018). - 64COAR, ‘COAR Response to Plan S’, 12 September 2018,
https://www.coar-repositories.org/files/COAR-response-to-Plan-S-Sept-2018.pdf (accessed 20 December 2018). - 65Brian Cody, ‘Plan S[how Me the Money]: Why Academic-Led Initiatives Represent a More Equitable, Less Costly Publishing Future’, Impact of Social Sciences (blog), 24 October 2018,
http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2018/10/24/plan-show-me-the-money-why-academic-led-initiatives-represent-a-more-equitable-less-costly-publishing-future/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 66cOAlition S, ‘Guidance on the Implementation of Plan S’.
- 67Gareth O’Neill, Matthew DiFranco, and Marcel Swart, ‘EuroDoc – Joint Statement on Open Access for Researchers via Plan S’, 24 September 2018,
http://eurodoc.net/joint-statement-plan-s.pdf (accessed 20 December 2018). - 68Schneider, ‘Response to Plan S from Academic Researchers: Unethical, Too Risky!’; ‘Reaction of Researchers to Plan S; Too Far, Too Risky?’, Plan S Open Letter,
https://sites.google.com/view/plansopenletter (accessed 7 January 2019). - 69Rick Anderson, ‘Mandatory Open-Access Publishing Can Impair Academic Freedom (Essay) | Inside Higher Ed’,
https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2015/12/15/mandatory-open-access-publishing-can-impair-academic-freedom-essay (accessed 20 December 2018). - 70Stephen Curry, ‘Academic Freedom and Responsibility: Why Plan S Is Not Unethical’, 1 October 2018,
http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2018/10/01/academic-freedom-and-responsibility-why-plan-s-is-not-unethical/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 71Paula Stephan, How Economics Shapes Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2012),
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Economics-Shapes-Science-Paula-Stephan/dp/0674049713 . - 72Harriet Zuckerman and Robert Merton,
‘Patterns of Evaluation in Science’ , 1971,http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/classics1986/A1986D405000001.pdf (accessed 20 December 2018); Michael Mabe, ‘Does Journal Publishing Have a Future?’, in R. Campbell, E. Pentz, and I. Borthwick (Eds.), Academic and Professional Publishing. (Oxford: Chandos, 2012). - 73Schiltz, ‘Preamble by Marc Schiltz: Science Without Publication Paywalls: A Preamble to: COAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access’.
- 74James Wilsdon et al.,
‘Next-Generation Metrics Responsible Metrics and Evaluation for Open Science.’ (Luxembourg: European Commission, 2017),https://ec.europa.eu/research/openscience/pdf/report.pdf (accessed 20 December 2018). - 75Schiltz, ‘Preamble by Marc Schiltz: Science Without Publication Paywalls: A Preamble to: COAlition S for the Realisation of Full and Immediate Open Access’.
- 76Suber, ‘Thoughts on Plan S’.
- 77Wellen, ‘Open Access, Megajournals, and MOOCs’, 12.
- 78‘DFG, German Research Foundation – DFG Statement on the Establishment of “COAlition S” to Support Open Access’.
- 79‘Plan S “Could Prove Fatal” for Learned Societies | Times Higher Education (THE)’,
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/plan-s-could-prove-fatal-learned-societies (accessed 3 November 2018). - 80STM Association, ‘STM Statement on Plan S: Accelerating the Transition to Full and Immediate Open Access to Scientific Publications.’
- 81Schneider, ‘Response to Plan S from Academic Researchers: Unethical, Too Risky!’; Henrik Urdal, ‘Free Access at a High Price’, PRIO Blogs (blog), 20 September 2018,
https://blogs.prio.org/2018/09/free-access-at-a-high-price/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 82Jon Tennant, ‘Full Comments about “Plan S” and the Future of Open Access in Europe’, Green Tea and Velociraptors (blog), 6 September 2018,
http://fossilsandshit.com/full-comments-about-plan-s-and-the-future-of-oa/ (accessed 20 December 2018). - 83‘Young Academies Release Statement in Response to “Plan S” on Open Access of Scientific Output’, Global Young Academy,
https://globalyoungacademy.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/YA-Statement-on-Plan-S-FINAL.pdf (accessed 21 December 2018). - 84Inchcoombe, ‘The Best Laid Plan S…’
- 85
‘Open Science Monitor’ , Text, European Commission – European Commission,https://ec.europa.eu/info/research-and-innovation/strategy/goals-research-and-innovation-policy/open-science/open-science-monitor_en (accessed 20 December 2018). - 86‘UUK Open Access Coordination Group’,
https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/research-policy/open-science/Pages/uuk-open-access-coordination-group.aspx (accessed 20 December 2018). - 87‘Rich “Should Pay to Help Poorer Nations Make Open Access Switch”’, Times Higher Education (THE), 2 November 2018,
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/rich-should-pay-help-poorer-nations-make-open-access-switch (21 December 2018). - 88Ostrom et al., ‘The Future of the Commons – Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation’, 60.
- 89Stephen Pinfield, ‘Making Open Access Work: The “State-of-the-Art” in Providing Open Access to Scholarly Literature’, Online Information Review 39, no. 5 (14 September 2015): 604–36; DOI: 10.1108/OIR-05-2015-0167 (accessed 20 December 2018).
- 90Ostrom et al., ‘The Future of the Commons – Beyond Market Failure and Government Regulation’, 61.
- 91Thomas Dietz, Elinor Ostrom, and Paul C. Stern, ‘The Struggle to Govern the Commons’, Science 302, no. 5652 (12 December 2003): 1907–12; DOI: 10.1126/science.1091015 (accessed 20 December 2018).