Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Demographic characteristics, description of the variant found, whether it was associated with nerve entrapment-related symptoms
| Case side | Age | Sex | UN variation | Symptoms | Bmax / Bprox ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Right | 55 | M | A small branch detaches from the DCBUN to proceed parallel to the UN, and just proximal to the pisiform passes through a bifid FCU, rejoining the UN at the proximal Guyon’s canal | Yes | 2.7 / 0.5 mm 5.4 |
| 2 Right | 70 | F | The aberrant branch detaches from the UN at the level of the usual DCBUN origin to follow a course similar to that of case 1. DCBUN is absent | No | 0.9 / 0.6 mm 1.5 |
| 3 (bilateral) Left | 48 | M | Similar to case 1 | Yes | 2.6 / 0.7 mm 3.7 |
| 4 (bilateral) Right | 48 | M | Similar to case 1 | Yes | 3 / 0.7 mm 4.3 |
| 5 Left | 37 | M | A small branch detaches from the UN just before the pisiform to pass through a bifid FCU, and then rejoins the UN at the proximal Guyon’s canal | No | 0.9 / 0.7 mm 1.3 |
| 6 Right | 51 | F | DCBUN forming a loop around an accessory, deeply located small FCU tendon | No | 0.6 / 0.3 mm 2 |