References
- Bij de Vaate AJ, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HA et al.: Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 43: 372–382.
- Vervoort AJ, Uittenbogaard LB, Hehenkamp WJ, Brölmann HA, Mol BW, Huirne JA: Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development. Hum Reprod 2015; 30: 2695–2702.
- Bij de Vaate AJ, Brölmann HA, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JA: Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: Relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011; 37: 93–99.
- Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF, Mackenna A et al.: The cesarean delivery scar pouch: clinical implications and diagnositic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22: 695–700.
- Fernandez E, Fernandez C, Fabres C, Alam VV: Hysteroscopic correction of cesarean section scars in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1996; 3: S13.
- Bauer ST, Bonanno C: Abnormal placentation. Semin Perinatol 2009; 33: 88–96.
- Hamar BD, Saber SB, Cackovic M, Magloire LK, Pettker CM, Abdel-Razeq SS et al.: Ultrasound evaluation of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled trial of one- and two-layer closure. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 808–813.
- Hayakawa H, Itakura A, Mitsui T, Okada M, Suzuki M, Tamakoshi K et al.: Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006; 85: 429–434.
- Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, Aygün M, Savan K: Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006; 124: 32–36.
- Sevket O, Ates S, Molla T, Ozkal F, Uysal O, Dansuk R: Hydrosonographic assessment of the effects of 2 different suturing techniques on healing of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2014; 125: 219–222.
- National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health commissioned by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence: National evidence-based clinical guidelines: Caesarean section, April 2004. RCOG Press, London 2004; 18.
- Ofili-Yebovi D, Ben-Nagi J, Sawyer E, Yazbek J, Lee C, Gonzalez J et al.: Deficient lower-segment Cesarean section scars: prevalence and risk factors. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 31: 72–77.
- Jastrow N, Chaillet N, Roberge S, Morency AM, Lacasse Y, Bujold E: Sonographic lower uterine segment thickness and risk of uterine scar defect: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010; 32: 321–327.